User:SchmuckyTheCat/Blocks

Special:Log&type=block&page=User:SchmuckyTheCat

17:12, 14 April 2007 Seraphimblade (Talk | contribs) unblocked SchmuckyTheCat (contribs) (Provisionally reversing per doubts raised by NYBrad)
17:08, 14 April 2007 Seraphimblade (Talk | contribs) blocked "SchmuckyTheCat (contribs)" (anon. only, account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 24 hours (3RR on Category:Hong Kong media)

12:24, 18 February 2007 Geni (Talk | contribs) unblocked SchmuckyTheCat (contribs) (3RR does not allow for 48 hour blocks)
21:24, 17 February 2007 AmiDaniel (Talk | contribs) blocked "SchmuckyTheCat (contribs)" (account creation blocked) with an expiry time of 48 hours (3RR on Farm Sanctuary)
03:37, 19 July 2006 William M. Connolley (Talk | contribs) blocked "SchmuckyTheCat (contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (3rr on Encyclopædia Dramatica)
14:32, 29 August 2005 Flcelloguy (Talk | contribs) blocked "SchmuckyTheCat (contribs)" with an expiry time of 24 hours (WP:3RR violation)

I've been blocked three times and one block was shortened.

The first block, by Flcelloguy in 2005, would never have gone over in 2007 with WP:BLP as policy. The article had several lies and identifying information in it and linked to external sites listing phone numbers and email addresses not just of the person but of their boss at work.

The second block (July 2006), well, sucks to be me. In the midst of a blanking war with a bullying admin I may have hit 3RR (I don't remember, and can't see the deleted edits). [1] For whatever reason, in the middle of the blanking back and forth by A LOT of editors, I was the only one from any side of that that got a 3RR block. In the end, the whole mess ended up at ArbCom for other users.

The third, another where I feel justified. When a lobbying activist group comes to Wikipedia and their paid director of communications, their admitted sock puppets, and volunteers acting as meat puppets are sanitizing the article on their corporation I think editors should feel welcome to revert that. It is the epitome of why conflict of interest exists.

The fourth, all four minutes of it, ended up as bygones of aggressively chasing the edits of a sockpuppet of a banned user. Comme ci, comme ça, c'est la vie.