User:Sardanaphalus/Template:Infobox SCOTUS case/tests
Appearance
Two-column (Infobox-like) layout
[edit]New York v. Connecticut | |
---|---|
Original jurisdiction Decided August 9, 1799 | |
Full case name | The State of New-York v. The State of Connecticut, et al. |
Citations | 4 U.S. 1 (more) 4 Dall. 1; 1 L. Ed. 715; 1799 U.S. LEXIS 243. |
Claim | New York moved to enjoin ejectment proceedings pending in a U.S. Circuit Court involving land over which New York and Connecticut claimed jurisdiction. |
Procedural history | Injunction denied, 4 U.S. 1 (1799) (Ellsworth, C.J.) |
Outcome | |
The State of New York was not a party to the ejectment action and had no interest at stake, because the Circuit Court lacked the power to determine its claim of rights over the disputed lands. Injunction denied. | |
Court membership | |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Ellsworth, joined by Paterson, Chase, Washington |
Cushing and Iredell took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
--------------- Categorization --------------- -->{{#if:{{{SubmitDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{SubmitYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ArgueDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ArgueYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ArgueDateA|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{DecideDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{DecideYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}
One-column (Sidebar-like) layout
[edit]New York v. Connecticut | |
---|---|
Original jurisdiction Decided August 9, 1799 | |
Full case name The State of New-York v. The State of Connecticut, et al. | |
Citations 4 U.S. 1 (more) 4 Dall. 1; 1 L. Ed. 715; 1799 U.S. LEXIS 243. | |
Claim New York moved to enjoin ejectment proceedings pending in a U.S. Circuit Court involving land over which New York and Connecticut claimed jurisdiction. | |
Procedural history Injunction denied, 4 U.S. 1 (1799) (Ellsworth, C.J.) | |
Outcome | |
The State of New York was not a party to the ejectment action and had no interest at stake, because the Circuit Court lacked the power to determine its claim of rights over the disputed lands. Injunction denied. | |
Court membership | |
[awaiting external template] | |
Case opinions | |
Majority Ellsworth, joined by Paterson, Chase, Washington | |
Cushing and Iredell took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
--------------- Categorization --------------- -->{{#if:{{{SubmitDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{SubmitYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ArgueDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ArgueYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ArgueDateA|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{DecideDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{DecideYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}
Two-column (Infobox-like) layout
[edit]Grutter v. Bollinger | |
---|---|
Argued April 1, 2003 Decided June 23, 2003 | |
Full case name | Barbara Grutter, Petitioner v. Lee Bollinger, et al. |
Citations | 539 U.S. 306 (more) 123 S.Ct. 2325, 156 L.Ed.2d 304, 71 USLW 4498, 91 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1761, 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,415, 177 Ed. Law Rep. 801, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5378, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6800, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 367 |
Prior history | Held for Plaintiff and enjoined use of current admissions policy, 137 F. Supp. 2d 821 (E.D. Mich. 2001); reversed, 288 F.3d 732 (6th Cir. 2002) (en banc); certiorari granted 537 U.S. 1043 (2002) |
Subsequent history | Rehearing denied, 539 U.S. 982 (2003) |
Holding | |
University of Michigan Law School admissions program that gave special consideration for being a certain racial minority did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. | |
Court membership | |
Case opinions | |
Majority | O'Connor, joined by Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |
Concurrence | Ginsburg, joined by Breyer |
Concur/dissent | Scalia, joined by Thomas |
Concur/dissent | Thomas, joined by Scalia |
Dissent | Rehnquist, joined by Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas |
Dissent | Kennedy |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. XIV | |
--------------- Categorization --------------- -->{{#if:{{{SubmitDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{SubmitYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ArgueDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ArgueYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ArgueDateA|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{DecideDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{DecideYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}
One-column (Sidebar-like) layout
[edit]Grutter v. Bollinger | |
---|---|
Argued April 1, 2003 Decided June 23, 2003 | |
Full case name Barbara Grutter, Petitioner v. Lee Bollinger, et al. | |
Citations 539 U.S. 306 (more) 123 S.Ct. 2325, 156 L.Ed.2d 304, 71 USLW 4498, 91 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1761, 84 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 41,415, 177 Ed. Law Rep. 801, 03 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5378, 2003 Daily Journal D.A.R. 6800, 16 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 367 | |
Prior history Held for Plaintiff and enjoined use of current admissions policy, 137 F. Supp. 2d 821 (E.D. Mich. 2001); reversed, 288 F.3d 732 (6th Cir. 2002) (en banc); certiorari granted 537 U.S. 1043 (2002) | |
Subsequent history Rehearing denied, 539 U.S. 982 (2003) | |
Holding | |
University of Michigan Law School admissions program that gave special consideration for being a certain racial minority did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. | |
Court membership | |
[awaiting external template] | |
Case opinions | |
Majority O'Connor, joined by Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer | |
Concurrence Ginsburg, joined by Breyer | |
Concurrence/Dissent Scalia, joined by Thomas | |
Concurrence/Dissent Thomas, joined by Scalia | |
Dissent Rehnquist, joined by Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas | |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. amend. XIV | |
--------------- Categorization --------------- -->{{#if:{{{SubmitDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{SubmitYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{SubmitYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ArgueDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ArgueYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ArgueDateA|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ArgueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDate2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDate2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueYear2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueYear2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{ReargueDateA2|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{ReargueDateA2}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{DecideDate|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideDate}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}<!-- -->{{#if:{{{DecideYear|}}} |{{#ifexist:{{{DecideYear}}}||{{{category|[[Category:Flagged U.S. Supreme Court articles]]}}}<!---->}}<!---->}}