User:Santasa99/About
6 November 2024 |
|
alternative account name
[edit]Three inactive alternative Userpage/names instances WP:ALTACCN :
Wikipedia:Babel | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
Search user languages |
small script notes template
[edit]- Note: This discussion has been included in the ...npr.→ list of Lists-related deletion discussions ... itd. --౪ Santa ౪99° 22:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
warning temp.
[edit]- == Edit warring and breaking 3-revert rule (3RR) ==
Your recent editing history at some article shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. That means that you are repeatedly changing important content (ref-notes) back to how you think it should be (you are removing them altogether), without any explanation (WP:FIES; in edit summary or talk page) or attempt to resolve the issue (WP:DR) by attempting to reach a consensus (WP:CONS) on article Talk Page, when you can see that other editor(s) disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.--౪ Santa ౪99° 16:47, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
sig
[edit]s a n t a | t a l k | v a u l t
s a n t a | t a ✩ l k | v a u l t
sig2
[edit]- Kiss me up & down!
- Kiss me up & down!
- observe → process → act
Nera
[edit]This user supports the preservation of the Neretva river.
- Pages that link to "Template:User Neretva"
- User:Bizutage supports Protect Neretva proposition
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Bosnia and Herzegovina/User Box
my tools
[edit]sig3
[edit]¿ ¿ ¿ ¿ ♥ ♥ ♥ ♥ | t a l k | ? ? ? ? ♣ ♣ ♣ ♣
⋊((̃((˞°> | t a l k | <°)̃̃)))>{
'b l a h-b l a h | ⓢⓐⓝⓣⓐ | it's full of sh...tars
'b l a h-b l a h | ⓢⓐⓝⓣⓐ | it's full of sh...tars
santasa99(talk)
/* sig3 */
icn
[edit]sym
[edit]♜♞♝♚♛♝♞♜ ♟♟♟♟♟♟♟♟
♙♙♙♙♙♙♙♙ ♖♘♗♔♕♗♘♖ ℂℍℕℙℚℝℤℵ⋊ ██ Estonia Please specify a rating.
consensus is queer oppression | argue | contribs
⛐ 🚦⛔ 🚫 ⚠ ☎ ☏ ☢️ ☣️ 𓆟 𓅟 𓆣 𓃢 🂡 ♠ ♣ ♥ ♦ ♤ ♧ ♡ ♢
🎲 ⛄
con
[edit]Talk
About me
Rant
Templates
Help
Subpages
Tools
Open soc
E-go
E-go
kiss me up & down
Sandbox 0 (Sb0)
Sb1
Sb2
Sb3
Sb4
Sb5 Istambul history template
Sb6 WP:BALKAN template message
Sb7 Turkish Croatia merger proposal
Sb8 Meatpuppetry/Canvasing: Soliciting help from hr.wikipedia (for support and voting)
Sb9 Infobox historic subdivision
Sb10 Hum (historic region)
Sb11 Template:current members small
Sb12 Template:current members section
Sb14 icons 4 GA review progress
Sb15 Bosnian genocide series templates
Sb16 Note templates
Sb17 Infobox river - template - za Neretvu
Sb18 bh. literature
Sb19 rep 1
Sb20 article ban el_c
How to create "sfn" and/or "harv" reference for Proceedings (Zbornik)
img
[edit]
img2[edit]
|