G'day, I am new to Wikipedia in that I only just became a registered user in 2014 so as to be accountable for the corrections that I make when I find "stuff" that is so blatantly 'un-Wiki' that it would be wrong (and where applicable so 'un-Vaishnava') not to do something about it.
Now that all utopian fantasies of literary freedom have been dispelled, I must reveal that I really don't take editing wikipedia seriously anymore! There is so much bias, both from ignorance and sectarian interests, that the anonymous input from self-proclaimed 'experts' with no academic qualifications whatsoever make it quite a farce - especially when it only takes one mouse click for anyone to revert any of your work. It would be humourous if it wasn't for the fact that a great deal of the (unsuspecting?) public believe what they read on these pages........try researching this for fun...
<<Popular Gurus of the Hippie Era: Spot the Charlatan>>
Ha ha you won't get far with that, proving that the internet is sadly lacking, unlike the innernet :-)
From a page move: This is a redirect from a page that has been moved (renamed). This page was kept as a redirect to avoid breaking links, both internal and external, that may have been made to the old page name.
