User:SUM1/sandbox2
Appearance
This message may fail to make a clear distinction between fact and fiction. |
This message may need to be rewritten entirely to comply with English quality standards. |
This message uses abbreviations that may be confusing or ambiguous. |
This message possibly contains unsourced predictions, speculative material or accounts of events that might not occur. |
This message contains content that is written like an advertisement. |
This message contains wording that promotes the subject in a subjective manner without imparting real information. |
This message may be too technical for most readers to understand. |
This message appears to contain trivial, minor or unrelated references to popular culture. |
This message provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. |
This message may contain an excessive amount of intricate detail that may only interest a specific audience. |
This message focuses too much on specific examples without explaining their importance to its main subject. |
This message is about an event or subject that may not be current but does not specify the time period. |
This message may be written from an excessively anthropocentric perspective. |
This message may stray from the topic of the conversation. |
This message needs attention from an expert in (enter topic here). |
This message's factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information. |
This message's factual accuracy may be compromised due to out-of-date information. |
This message needs to be updated. |
This message needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. |
This message may be confusing or unclear to readers. |
This message may be confusing or unclear to readers. |
This message appears to contradict itself. |
This message appears to contradict another message. |
This message may be incomprehensible or very hard to understand. |
This message may contain misleading parts. |
This message contains statements that may date quickly and become unclear. |
This message may lack focus or may be about more than one topic. |
This message's factual accuracy is disputed. |
The examples and perspective in this message may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. |