User:SBerenyi4/sandbox

Article Review

Special Olympics (Week 2)

User:Codystgermain/sandbox User:Morris116084/sandbox

1: Everything was relevant to my topic

2: No the article does not seem neutral in some cases. Some of it is written like an advertisement. Also, there are aspects of it that seem promotional.

3: The symbols section seems to be the viewpoint or information that is underrepesented the most.

4: After checking sources (6) and (21), the information lined up with the citation and was easy to navigate.

5: The article has a criticism section. However, this section only has one article written by K Stoney, More information should be added to this section with other viewpoints of criticism from other reliable sources.

6: Most information is extremely up to date. There is a reference from 2007 and 2004 though

7: Each fact was referenced with an appropriate and reliable reference.

8: Most of the sources seem reliable; however, there seems to be quite a bit of press material within the page.

9: Not sure how to get to the talk page of the article.

(Week 3)

{{

notes

{{reflist}}