Jump to content

User:Sławomir Biały/User:Brad7777

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 18:50, 31 August 2011 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 22:10, 17 November 2024 (UTC).



Users should not edit other people's summaries or views, except to endorse them. All signed comments other than your own view or an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page.

Statement of the dispute

[edit]

This is a summary written by users who are concerned by this user's conduct. Users signing other sections ("Response" or "Outside views") should not edit the "Statement of the dispute" section.

Desired outcome

[edit]

This is a summary written by users who have initiated the request for comment. It should spell out exactly what the changes they'd like to see in the user, or what questions of behavior should be the focus.

A reasonable outcome would be that Brad7777 will agree to discontinue using all semi-automated tools to do editing. The most desirable outcome is that he focus on for editing content rather than categorization and templates. For instance, there is no shortage of articles that are already flagged as lacking sources. He could help the project more by adding sources, adding footnotes, etc.

Description

[edit]

{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views. Editors writing this section should not normally add additional views below.}

Many editors at WP:WPM have found the actions of User:Brad7777 disruptive. Specifically Brad7777, a new user with no experience in editing for content, has been using the semi-automated tool HotCat to make massive and controversial changes to the categorization system within mathematics articles. Now Brad7777 is also using Twinkle to do massive drive-by templating of articles (some of which are disruptive) as well as taking things to AfD without performing even the minimal checks (WP:BEFORE). Several discussions at WT:WPM have admonished Brad7777 to discontinue mass changes to categories, and at the very least indicated that his editing pattern is disruptive, but appeared to have little effect. Instead he moved from editing math categories to psychology and sociology categories, but now he seems to have moved back to math categories. Communications with Brad7777, both on his user page and at the project discussion page, are frustrated by Brad's denial that there is a problem (or other evasions), or acknowledgment that there is a problem but failure to do anything about them.

Evidence of disputed behavior

[edit]

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

  1. Adding non-existent categories to articles using HotCat: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35],

Applicable policies and guidelines

[edit]

{List the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

  1. WP:DE, specifically WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT and WP:POINT

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

[edit]

(Provide diffs of the comments. As with anywhere else on this RfC/U, links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

Attempts by certifier User:Sławomir Biały

[edit]
  1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics/Archive/2012/Feb#More_massive_category_changes

Attempts by certifier C2

[edit]

Other attempts

[edit]
  1. By User:JohnBlackburne: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mathematics/Archive/2011/Nov#Mass_overcategorization_of_maths_articles
  2. By User:Tiphareth: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brad7777&oldid=479826738#Lots_of_.22category.22_changes_for_mathematics
  3. By User:The Anome: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Brad7777&oldid=479826738#Discussion_of_category_changes

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

[edit]

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

Other users who endorse this summary

[edit]

Response

[edit]

This section is reserved for the use of the user whose conduct is disputed. Users writing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section, and the person writing this section should not write a view below. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but no one except the editor(s) named in the dispute may change the summary here.


{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it.}


Users who endorse this summary:

Views

[edit]

This section is for statements or opinions written by users not directly involved with this dispute, but who would like to add a view of the dispute. Users should not edit other people's summaries or views, except to endorse them. All signed comments other than your own view or an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" or "Response") should not normally edit this section, except to endorse another person's view.

Outside view by ExampleUsername

[edit]

{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view by ExampleUsername

[edit]

{Add your summary here. You must use the endorsement section below to sign it. Anyone is welcome to endorse this or any other view, but do not change other people's views.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Reminder to use the talk page for discussion

[edit]

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.