User:Roseamoura26
BIO
[edit]ABOUT ME
[edit]I'm from Washington. My passions are reading, baking, exercising, and learning new things. In my free time, I am a big fan of MasterChef, a show that fuels my passion for cooking and creativity. I often recreate dishes from the show. However, my primary interest lies in the medical field. Having previously worked in a medical office as a doctor's assistant, I was inspired to learn more and grow in this field. My ultimate goal is to become a successful nurse, a journey I am dedicated to. Nursing is one of the oldest jobs in America.[1]
My Wikipedia Interests
[edit]If I were to work on content on Wikipedia, I would focus on editing articles and raising awareness about the effects and potential harms to the developmental process that come with excessive screen time with toddlers and younger children. I aim to promote educational awareness and expand on articles related to fun and creative activities to keep children occupied and off devices. I am committed to engaging with the community and ensuring accurate information is readily available.
Article evaluation
[edit]I chose the Mary Kirkpatrick article on Wikipedia because of her fascinating contributions to the medical field. My interest in the subject stems from my desire to work as an OB/GYN Nurse, which has given me a deep appreciation for her work and legacy. I visited Mary Kirkpatrick's article on Wikipedia. I found three aspects worth commenting on, whether anything essential is left out, the reliability of the citations, and the balance of represented viewpoints.
Missing Information
[edit]The article about Mary Kirkpatrick overlooks crucial aspects of her life and career. While it does provide basic biographical details and notable achievements, it fails to discuss her early influences and personal challenges, which were significant in her journey. Including these details would undeniably present a more comprehensive and profound depiction of her significance. Shedding light on her education, mentorship, and potential pioneering work will enhance readers' understanding of her impact.
Citation Quality
[edit]The article needs proper citations for some of the information presented. It would benefit from more reliable sources such as interviews, personal letters, and contemporary news articles to ensure accuracy and credibility. Consistent use of citations throughout the article is essential for maintaining the integrity of the information.
Representation of Viewpoints
[edit]The article has an unbalanced representation of viewpoints. It mainly focuses on Mary's professional achievements and public image while giving less attention to her personal life and the broader context of her work. A more balanced representation of viewpoints, including diverse perspectives from colleagues, critics, and family members, could provide a more comprehensive portrayal of Mary Kirkpatrick, which is an area that needs significant improvement.
Conclusion
[edit]Overall, the Wikipedia article about Mary Kirkpatrick is decent, but it needs improvement. It lacks vital details about her early influences and personal challenges. Better citations, including interviews and personal letters, are essential for credibility. The article should also incorporate diverse perspectives for a more balanced representation of viewpoints.
References
[edit]- ^ Denny, Nathan (2023-05-30). "9 Surprising Facts About Nursing You Didn't Know". CareerStaff Unlimited. Retrieved 2024-07-08.