User:Rjanag/One-child policy by province
| This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Rjanag/One-child_policy_by_province. |
- (If anyone knows where UNESCAP have this list consolidated that would be great.)
| Province | Exemptions allowed | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Anhui | ||
| Beijing municipality | ||
| Chongqing municipality[1] | ||
| Fujian[2] | ||
| Gansu[3] | ||
| Guangdong[4] | ||
| Guangxi Autonomous Region | ||
| Guizhou[5] | ||
| Hainan | ||
| Hebei[6] | ||
| Heilongjiang | ||
| Henan[7] | ||
| Hubei[8] | ||
| Hunan | ||
| Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region | ||
| Jiangsu[9] | ||
| Jiangxi[10] | ||
| Jilin[11] | ||
| Liaoning | ||
| Ningxia Autonomous Region | ||
| Qinghai | ||
| Shaanxi[12] | ||
| Shandong | ||
| Shanghai municipality[13] | ||
| Shanxi | ||
| Sichuan[14] | ||
| Tianjin municipality[15] | ||
| Tibet Autonomous Region | ||
| Xinjiang Autonomous Region | ||
| Yunnan | ||
| Zhejiang |
References
[edit]- ^ http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/poplaws/law_china/ch_record064.htm
- ^ http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/poplaws/law_china/ch_record065.htm
- ^ http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/poplaws/law_china/ch_record066.htm
- ^ http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/poplaws/law_china/ch_record067.htm
- ^ http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/poplaws/law_china/ch_record068.htm
- ^ http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/poplaws/law_china/ch_record069.htm
- ^ http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/poplaws/law_china/ch_record060.htm
- ^ http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/poplaws/law_china/ch_record058.htm
- ^ http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/poplaws/law_china/ch_record063.htm
- ^ http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/poplaws/law_china/ch_record071.htm
- ^ http://www.asianlii.org/cn/legis/jl/laws/rojpopafp603/ Articles 31-32
- ^ http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/poplaws/law_china/ch_record074.htm
- ^ http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/poplaws/law_china/ch_record073.htm
- ^ http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/poplaws/law_china/ch_record075.htm Articles 11-13
- ^ http://www.unescap.org/esid/psis/population/database/poplaws/law_china/ch_record076.htm
Discussion (discussion of the fact box)
[edit]- Are the policies given in the UNESCAP archives here the most recent policies? Is there a way we can verify that? —Politizer talk/contribs 19:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- Good question, UNESCAP page is popular so Google ranks it high, but it is not always have the most recent laws. Here's the Google search in question. Bobby fletcher (talk) 20:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- If this grows, it would probably be better to make it a list-type article of its own, linked from here using {{main}}. This will especially be the case if we list exemptions more specifically for each province. —Politizer talk/contribs 19:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
- The format I just made for the table is only a suggestion/experiment. Another possible format would be to have provinces/regions/municipalities on the horizontal axis, possible exemptions on the vertical axis (ie, "Parents both only children," "Child disabled," etc.) and each box would be a Yes or No. That might be easier for readers to use, but more labor-intensive. —Politizer talk/contribs 19:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)