User:Rhetoricanista/sandbox
The Relf Sisters, Minnie Lee and Mary Alice Relf (who were 12 and 14 years old in 1973, respectively), are two African-American sisters who were involuntarily sterilized by tubal ligation by a federally funded family planning clinic in Montgomery, Alabama in 1973. A class-action lawsuit filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center brought the wide-spread reality of U.S. government-funded sterilization abuse to the national spotlight.
Relf family background and context
[edit]Mary Alice and Minnie Lee are the youngest of six children born to Lonnie and Minnie Relf.[1] The Relf family experienced poverty while living in Montgomery, Alabama. Lonnie Relf, having been injured in a car accident, was unable to work and neither he nor his wife, Minnie, were able to read or write.[2] The family received support from the Montgomery, Alabama Community Action Committee which, in 1971, relocated the family to live in public housing.[3]
Relf Sterilization
[edit]The Relf sisters were vaulted into the national spotlight because of the compulsory sterilization that they endured in 1973.
Mary and Minnie's older sister Katie Relf (who was 17 years old in 1973) was not forcibly sterilized at the time her sisters underwent the procedure, but she was operated on before them. However in 1971, when the Montgomery Community Action (MCA) moved the Relf family into public housing, the Family Planning Service of MCA “began the unsolicited administration of experimental birth control injections” on Katie.[3] In March 1973, Katie, a minor, was taken to the Family Planning Clinic, where she had an intrauterine device, or IUD, insertion procedure. Neither of Katie’s parents were asked to give permission for Katie to receive this form of birth control, and Katie “submitted to the directions of the clinic staff that she accept implantation of the device."[3]
Before Mary Alice and Minnie Lee were operated on, they were given Depo-Provera, a birth control shot.[4]
In June 1973, two social workers from Montgomery Community visited the Relf residence with concerns that young boys were “hanging around” Minnie Lee and Mary Alice.[5] Lonnie was not home.[1] The MCA workers told Minnie that her daughters were going to receive some "shots."[3] The three were transported to a hospital, where Mrs. Relf, who could neither read nor write, signed a consent form with a "X."[3][6]
According to the original complaint filed by the Southern Poverty Law Center, after Mrs. Relf was taken home the girls stayed in the hospital but were not given information on the procedure. Although Minnie Lee contacted her mother and asked to leave the hospital, Mrs. Relf did not have access to transportation to bring her daughters home. Three days after the operation, the girls were released from the hospital.[3]
Lonnie returned home and went to visit his daughters at the clinic. When he arrived, the nurses advised him that visiting hours were over and he was not able to see Mary or Minnie.[7]
[End of my changes so far]
The Relf Sisters page revision ideas
[edit][still to be revised]
Mr. Relf noticed scar tissue formed on both of his youngest daughters' bodies. He asked his social worker to find out what had actually happened at the clinic. Once Lonnie and Minnie Relf came to the realization that their daughters were sterilized without their consent, they filed for a lawsuit with the help of the Southern Poverty Law Center.[6] Katie Relf would also represent with her sisters in the court case Relf v. Weinberger. The case resulted in prohibiting the use of federal funds for involuntary sterilizations.[8] The defendants in the case, Casper Weinberger and Arnett were found to have "used federal funds and the powers devolved upon them to bring about the use of birth control measures, including sterilization, on the plaintiffs (in the case of O.E.O.) and the class they represent (in the case of O.E.O. and H.E.W.) The defendants Casper Weinberger and Arnett as well as their predecessors in office were found to have acted to deny plaintiffs and their class status the right to procreate, which is a constitutionally protected right, by "failing to establish any guidelines for birth control programs conducted with federal funds, under federal auspices or by failing to distribute such guidelines once formulated." [9]
[Relf family background section]
Revision: Mary Alice and Minnie Lee are the youngest of six children born to Lonnie and Minnie Relf. [Need to check citation.] The Relf family experienced poverty while living in Montgomery, Alabama. Lonnie Relf, having been injured in a car accident, was unable to work and neither he nor his wife, Minnie, were able to read or write. The family received support from the Montgomery, Alabama Community Action Program (CAP) [citation needed]. [Need connection to the use of the family planning clinic??] There is no evidence that the girls sought family planning services, that their parents sought such services, or that that either of the sisters were at risk for an unintended pregnancy.[10]
[Legacy section]
[Talk page references following Carrie Buck page organization. I am considering a Legacy section--should come after section on the sterilization.]
In recounting the significance of the Relf sisters' experience, Angela Davis writes that "[i[t was not until the media decided that the casual sterilization of two Black girls in Montgomery, Alabama, was a scandal worth reporting that the Pandora's box of sterilization abuse was finally flung open."[11]
[Relf sterlization section]
Current reference to "peculiar side effects" from Depo-Provera could be changed to "because it was found to cause cancer when tested on animals."[12]
- ^ a b Alexander, Daryl (September 1973). "A Montgomery Tragedy: The Relf Family Refused to be the Nameless Victims of Involuntary Sterilization". Essence: 42–43, 82, 96.
- ^ Jr, B. Drummond Ayres (1973-07-08). "The Nation". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2018-03-21.
- ^ a b c d e f Levin, Dees, and Palmer (July 31, 1973). "Complaint" (PDF).
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) CS1 maint: url-status (link) - ^ Rojas, Maythee (2009-12-29). Women of Color and Feminism: Seal Studies. Basic Books. p. 101. ISBN 978-1-58005-325-9.
- ^ Dorr, Gregory Michael (2008). "Protection or Control? Women's Health, Sterilization ABuse, and Relf v. Weinberger". In Lombardo, Logan, and Mehlman (ed.). Century of Eugenics in America: From the Indiana Experiment to the Human Genome Era. Indiana University Press. p. 161.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: editors list (link) - ^ a b Alexander, Daryl (September 1973). "A Montgomery Tragedy: The Relf Family Refused to be the Nameless Victims of Involuntary Sterilization". Essence: 42–43, 82, 96.
- ^ Jr, B. Drummond Ayres (1973-07-08). "The Nation". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2018-03-21.
- ^ "Relf v. Weinberger". Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved 2018-03-21.
- ^ https://www.splcenter.org/sites/default/files/d6_legacy_files/Relf_Original_Complaint.pdf
- ^ Kluchin, Rebecca M. (2009). Fit to Be Tied: Sterilization and Reproductive Rights in America, 1950-1980. Rutgers University Press. pp. 98–99. ISBN 978-0-8135-4527-1.
- ^ Feminist Postcolonial Theory: A Reader. Edinburgh University Press. 2003. p. 361. doi:10.3366/j.ctvxcr9q0.21. ISBN 978-0-7486-1349-6.
- ^ Feminist Postcolonial Theory: A Reader. Edinburgh University Press. 2003. p. 362. doi:10.3366/j.ctvxcr9q0.21. ISBN 978-0-7486-1349-6.