Jump to content

User:ProfGray/312/Lesson plan week 3

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Lesson plan: Week 3. Religions of the Hebrew Bible. Return to the course page

Monday

[edit]

Review worksheet

Brief reading exercise

JSB apparatus -- intro remarks

  • How to find the author of the annotations? (margin notes)
  • Do the annotations reflect critical thinking?
    • Source critical notes. Example 2:4b-6 as J "earth and heaven"
    • ANE and comparative religion. 1:1, Nephilim as myth, 6:15
    • Literary criticism and intertextual info, example on p.15
    • Key concepts, e.g., covenant at 7:18
    • Religious analysis, e.g., Jewish interpretations (see Genesis 12)

Coogan ch.4 -- critical theory

  • Why? p.56: "the repetitions, the inconsistencies, and the contradictions"
  • Doublet examples.
  • Box 4.1 on p.53 God's POV and beastly pairs
    • JSB p.20 at 6:19-20 Levenson sees the pairs as a contradiction
  • WP example: Preparing the ark does not mention sources, yet Great Deluge section does.
  • Nuances or challenges
  • Additional sources besides 4
  • Hexateuch hypothesis
  • What led up to each of these sources? What is a source is not ancient but antiquarian?! (56)
  • Key terms and concepts
  • Form criticism is mentioned (57)
  • Creativity in combining the sources: redaction criticism
  • Linked sources: D and Dtr, P and Ezekiel

Coogan ch.5. A few key points

  • J issues
  • Humans loss of easy connection to the soil
  • Boundary-blurring: eat fruit to be like gods, sex with sons of God, and tower of Babel
  • Wicked people, Cain, Flood, Gen. 8:21 (evil inclination)

Agenda: 3:10 pm
WP assignments: Now and next steps

Show and discuss proposed sentences -- i.e., gaps to be filled with Coogan (or JSB)

Questions about these steps?

  • Finish your Talk page and Sandbox edits -- show your Team your references, your proposed sentences, and in which article(s) the sentences could be added.
  • Step 5: Start talking! [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:ProfGray/ExerciseIntroEdit#Step_5:_Introduce_your_ideas_and_role_on_Article_Talk_page.28s.29:_Week_3_by_Wednesday.2C_Feb._11 see the assignment]
  • Step 6: Best if teams do a quick peer review. Is the paraphrase too close? Is the reference fine? Does it belong in the article?
  • Team coordination this week -- peer review
  • Team coordination for next week -- divide up the Wife-sister academic articles

Wednesday

[edit]

Objectives for today:

  1. Quickly review the BRE from Monday.  Done
  2. Make progress on the Intro Edits exercise (for weeks 2-3). Let's make sure everyone can post in their Sandbox. For students who are almost finished and ready to edit an article -- let's aim to peer review these.  Done
  3. Set up the Wife-Sister assignment. Go over the instructions. Circulate the articles. Time for team planning.  Done
  4. Discuss your comparisons of the Wife-Sister narratives.  Done
  5. If there's time, we will review Coogan.

Handouts

Hand back the BREs
  1. 2 Intro Edits exercise -- we will do this on laptops
  1. 3 For Wife-sister assignment, handout the WP article and assignment (if printer working) and scholarly articles
  1. 4. Wife-sister narratives
  • Questions about the Biblical texts
  • if time ==> read chapter 20:1-18, easier to act out, or 12:10-17 together. JSB on 20 is source critical, literary and intertextual
  • Discuss student comparisons

Readings and tasks for today were:

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:ProfGray/312/Lesson_plan_week_3&oldid=646705624"