User:Prodego/archive/43
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:Prodego. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page. |
Signpost updated for February 26th, 2007.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 9 | 26 February 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Shoeless editor
I don't see anyone easily confusing the two names. Hunted by A.K.G. 22:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not that familiar with policy, but isn't there something called WP:AGF? Hunted by A.K.G. 22:42, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Will you give him a chance? If he vandalizes, you can easily block him, right? Hunted by A.K.G. 22:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- How likely is it that someone would mistake one for the other? Hunted by A.K.G. 22:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe CSCWEM gave him a clever idea. Never assume malice when stupidity will suffice. Hunted by A.K.G. 23:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Hunted by A.K.G. Unblock Request
He's pasted the appropriate template now but I would not grant the request. The WHOIS of the IP indicates it is not a shared IP and that the user blocked could be this person.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, I see you already have noticed that.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- So that's what Shoeless editor meant :P.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanx
For the revert:)--– Dakota 00:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Panther pack
Panther pack Blanked both your user and talk page have rv'd it but thought you should know if he trys to do such in future --St.daniel 00:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
So you have a sock puppet who thinks he can block an admin. That must be interesting. --St.daniel 00:14, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Did you think about procecting your page or is it just not that much of a bother. --St.daniel 00:20, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
That is true. But does this vandal randomally show up or has he been coming constantally for a while now? --St.daniel 00:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Is there a official [sic] sock puppet page set up for this vandal or is it a recognize and deal with kind of thing? --St.daniel 00:34, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
k --St.daniel 12:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
stop the removal
Deleting my comments serves no purpose but to create edit wars when I have to add them back. Leave them alone. Plenty of others have been allowed to give opinions, I'm no different. Coolgamer 01:26, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
I understand that, but you were the one who removed my original comment the first time before I reverted to a previous version. I cannot keep all changes in a 97k article. Coolgamer 01:27, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Re. VandalProof
I think it could be the brackets... I'm looking into it *sigh* Ale_Jrbtalk 14:57, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Survey Invitation
Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 04:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me
Editor Review
Thank you for the advice, I have followed it and commented on the Editor Review, but I cannot rescind my criticism of Jimbo's double standards and varying levels of respect for the rules he himself made depending on his whims. Just Heditor review 04:39, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 5th, 2007.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 3, Issue 10 | 5 March 2007 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:35, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
VP
Just a note, the backlog at User:AmiDaniel/VP/Approval has surpassed 45 users. --Hojimachongtalk 02:01, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
My RFA
Hey prodego, could you offer your support to my RfA? It's looking rather 1:1 right now I'm afraid but one good vote comment could make all the difference! --frothT 21:29, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Well the reason I asked for your support is because I want your support! ;) Email me if you want to question me, that's fine. If I don't fit your criteria then it's definately OK with me if you oppose --frothT 21:44, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
VandalProof
I noticed that the last time anyone was approved for VandalProof was 27 February 2007. Why have there not been any approvals since then? Thanks! --Theunicyclegirl 15:07, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
VandalProof
Oh. Well would you mind verifying me for it? Or would that be unfair?
--Theunicyclegirl 22:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- *coughs for attention*
--Theunicyclegirl 20:27, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Concerning your Admin Coaching assignments
Your name is still listed at Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Volunteers. The department is heavily backlogged with student's requests for coaches, and we need your help!
Note that the instructions may have changed since the last time you checked, and the department now follows a self-help process...
If you don't currently have a student, or if you believe you can handle another one, please select a student from the request list at Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Requests and contact them. See the instructions on Wikipedia:Admin coaching. Good luck.
If you are no longer available to coach, , please remove yourself from the volunteers list.
Thank you.
The Transhumanist 03:26, 13 March 2007 (UTC)