Jump to content

User:Poorlyglot/sandbox/002

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page has been removed from search engines' indexes.

Natalie Grams
Natalie Grams wearing indigo shirt and tan jacket
Grams in 2017
Born (1978-04-12) April 12, 1978 (age 46)
Bavaria, Germany
NationalityGerman
Occupations
Years active2004-present
Known for
  • Criticism of homeopathy
  • Advocacy of Better Medicine
Websitenatalie-grams.de (in German)

Natalie Grams (born 12 April 1978 in Munich, Germany) is a German physician and author. Formerly a practicing homeopath, she became known throughout Germany as a whistleblower for her 2015 debut book Homeopathy Reconsidered — What Really Helps Patients. In 2016 she joined the German Council of Science and Humanities and in January 2017 became Communications Manager for the skeptical Society for the Scientific Investigation of Parasciences (GWUP).[1] She also serves on the advisory board of the humanist Giordano Bruno Foundation since May 2017,[2] and as vice president of the Humanist Press Foundation in Germany since October 2017.[3] In May 2017 her second book, Gesundheit — A Book Not Without Side Effects, was published.

Biography

[edit]

Grams grew up in Bavaria, where she graduated high school in 1997. She studied medicine at Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Technical University of Munich, and Heidelberg University, where in 2005 she gained licensure as a physician in Germany.[4][5] In 2007 she received her doctorate as a medical faculty member at the University of Zurich. Until 2009 she was an intern at a private religiously-affiliated hospital in Heidelberg, where she specialized in geriatric and palliative medicine.

In 2004, in parallel with her medical education, Grams began pursuing education in traditional Chinese medicine and homeopathy. She completed her homeopathic education with an additional professional designation in that area,[6] and was active exclusively in private homeopathic practice from 2009 through 2015.

In May 2015 her first book Homeopathy Reconsidered — What Really Helps Patients was published by Springer Verlag in German (German title Homöopathie neu gedacht – Was Patienten wirklich hilft). She abandoned her homeopathic activity the same year.[7] Grams is currently active as a science communicator.[8]

Criticism of homeopathy and alternative medicine

[edit]

Grams is an authority, and a leading participant in public debate, on the subject of homeopathy.[9][10] As a practicing homeopathic doctor she was interviewed by journalists Christian Weymayr and Nicole Heißmann for their book The Homeopathy Lie (German title: Die Homöopathie-Lüge).[11] Upon reading that book's criticism of homeopathy, Grams wanted to write a rebuttal from the homeopathic perspective.

Instead, her research on this rebuttal and her intensive consideration of scientific findings[12][13] on the subject of homeopathy led Grams to revise her own views. Rather than the planned defense, her first book Homeopathy Reconsidered — What Really Helps Patients, published in May 2015, turned out to be a critical examination of the discipline. The book is especially critical of claims that homeopathy constitutes a specific drug therapy.[14] Grams tried to be empathetic in her writing style, intending for the reader to "feel [her] agony, discovering these facts about homeopathy."[15]

At the end of this learning process, Grams decided to abandon her own private homeopathic practice, and with it her previous economic livelihood, because she no longer wanted to offer therapies that she could not fully stand behind.[10] In explaining this decision, she draws a contrast between the lack of scientific support[12][16][17] for homeopathy and the positive aspects of a homeopathic setting, including the approachable and attentive style of patient care sometimes termed talking medicine.

Although Grams fundamentally opposes homeopathy as a discipline, she wishes to see mainstream health systems embrace the idea of better medicine — an effort to enable intensive attention to the patient in daily medical practice.[18]

The impact of Grams' position in print media,[19][20][14][21][22][23][24] radio, and television[25][26][27][28] was an essential factor in the intensified German public discourse surrounding homeopathy since 2015.[29][30][31][32] She delivered a talk at SkepKon 2017 titled Enlightenment about pseudomedicine: What have skeptics achieved?[33]

Along with author and homeopathy critic Norbert Aust, Grams co-founded the Information Network on Homeopathy (Informationsnetzwerk Homöopathie — INH) in 2016.[34][35][10][36]

She lent her expertise as an author in support of the Münster Memorandum on Practitioners of Alternative Medicine, which aims to mitigate the potential for patient harm from therapists who lack academic medical education (Heilpraktiker — literally healing practitioners) by proposing a German regulatory framework to balance the concerns of patient autonomy and freedom of therapy against fairness to health insurance providers and insurees.[37][38]

Reaction

[edit]

Grams took up the publication of her 2015 book with the intention of stimulating self-reflection among those in the homeopathic orbit. She has expressed regret that this introspection had not yet happened. Homeopaths who reviewed her first book have questioned the motivation behind her conversion and expressed astonishment that Grams did not "wash out" of her homeopathic education relatively early, given her doubts.[39][40]

As of November 2017 she was working on a book collecting and examining the many angry e-mails and comments she has received in response to her writing and activism. She hopes to reach people who hold the popular perception of homeopaths as "lovely, … empathetic, and good people" and prompt them to re-examine that opinion.[41]

Quotes

[edit]
  • "The doubt came when I learned that, in evaluating the efficacy of a therapy, the decisive thing is not one's experience but rather the results of clinical studies."[42]
  • "The fact is: We have no cause to believe that homeopathic medicines have an effect which goes beyond the placebo effect. If a group of doctors staunchly asserts that homeopathy works, one must — for the sake of patients — object."[43]
  • "I first understood, through a book by Kahneman that deals with 'fast and slow thinking', that I attached to homeopathy with my fast, intuitive thinking, perhaps 'thinking with my gut', although I was otherwise capable of rational, analytical — 'slow' — thinking. I avoided cognitive dissonance by rationally questioning homeopathy at a very late stage."[44]
  • "The trigger was a book that I wanted to write in defense of homeopathy — as a reaction to the book The Homeopathy Lie. In the research I sought arguments to justify scientifically the successes I experienced every day with homeopathy. But as much as I looked, I had to realize: there is not much left."[45]
  • "Homeopathy works because we homeopaths and our patients have the idea that it works."[46]
  • "It was hard for me, I was so deep inside myself."[47]
  • "...Hahnemann was very clever, he questioned everything, and the medicine he rebelled against in those days was dominated by superstitions and by therapies that were perilous to the lives of the patients. Homeopathy was, at the time, the lesser evil... "[48]
  • "Hahnemann deceived himself."[49]
  • "Homeopathy is itself a patient. It lacks data and facts, it hallucinates, it does not want to admit its illness. But insight into illness can be a first step to recovery."[50]
  • "In homeopathy efficacy is no greater than a placebo. Which is not surprising, since their medicines contain nothing."[51]
  • "Homeopathy always seemed to me like some sort of 'parallel knowledge', that is just as admissable and legitimate as scientific knowledge. It was hard to see how much I had deceived myself."[52]
  • "Among homeopaths there is often a wholly distorted picture of science and scientific work. Science is considered to be a kind of worldview which, as a homeopath, it is best to resist. Thus it remains unclear what kind of arduous, detailed work and thinking is required in science in order to arrive at a result. Science is not a worldview, but a method. ...The practical part of homeopathy, that of attentiveness to the patient, is unbelievably valuable. We must carry this over into everyday medical and clinical life — but without the magic part involving succussion and potentization."[24]

Writings

[edit]
  • Homöopathie neu gedacht – Was Patienten wirklich hilft (Homeopathy Reconsidered — What Really Helps Patients). Springer-Verlag, Berlin/ Heidelberg 2015, ISBN 978-3-662-45336-0.
  • Gesundheit – Ein Buch nicht ohne Nebenwirkungen (Gesundheit — A Book Not Without Side Effects). Springer-Verlag, Berlin/ Heidelberg 2017, ISBN 978-3-662-54798-4.

See Also

[edit]
Edzard Ernst
German-born former homeopath turned outspoken critic of homeopathy and alternative medicine generally
Britt Marie Hermes
American ex-naturopath turned whistleblower; As of January 2018, remediating her academic medical education in Germany

References

[edit]
  1. ^ "Wissenschaftsrat" [Council of Science and Humanities]. GWUP.org (in German). Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  2. ^ "Beiratsmitglieder der Giordano-Bruno-Stiftung" [Advisory Board Members of the Giordano Bruno Foundation]. Giordano Bruno Stiftung (in German). Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  3. ^ "Der Trägerverein des hpd mit neuem Präsidium" [Supporting Staff of HPD with New Executive Committee]. hpd.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  4. ^ Grabar, Edda. "Homöopathie: Die Nestbeschmutzerin" [Homeopathy: The Whistleblower]. zeit.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  5. ^ Bergmann, Jens. "Natalie Grams: Die Ketzerin" [Natalie Grams: The Heretic]. brandeins.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  6. ^ "Who is Who: Dr. Natalie Grams". GWUP.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  7. ^ "Eine Ärztin denkt um: "Homöopathie hat keine arzneiliche Wirkung"" [A Physician Thinks About: "Homeopathy has no Medicinal Effect"]. rnz.de (in German). Rhein Neckar Zeitung. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  8. ^ "Nachrichten am 12.01.2017" [Stories on 12.01.2017]. GWUP.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  9. ^ "Homöopathie: Wirksame Medizin oder Geldverschwendung?" [Homeopathy: Effective Medicine or Waste of Money?]. daserste.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  10. ^ a b c "Kritische Diskussion über die Homöopathie – Wirksame Medizin oder Placebo" [Critical Discussion About Homeopathy — Effective Medicine or Placebo]. Heilpraxisnet.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  11. ^ "Für alle Homöopathen, die meinen, meine Story wäre nur erfunden..." [For All Homeopaths Who Think my Story was Made Up]. homoeopathie-neu-gedacht.blogspot.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  12. ^ a b "NHMRC Statement on Homeopathy and NHMRC Information Paper - Evidence on the effectiveness of homeopathy for treating health conditions". nhmrc.gov.au. Australian Government National Health and Medical Research Council. February 3, 2015. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  13. ^ "Australischer Gutachter "Immer noch keine Evidenz für die Homöopathie"" [Australian Expert "Still no Evidence for Homeopathy"]. deutsche-apotheker-zeitung.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  14. ^ a b "Ex-Homöopathin über Globuli "Es war mein Lebenstraum"" [Ex Homeopath on Globules "It was my Life's Dream"]. taz.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  15. ^ Pintér, András; Levin, Jelena; Böckman, Pontus (October 3, 2016). "Episode #042, feat. Natalie Grams" (MP3). soundcloud.com. 9m32s: The Europeean Skeptics Podcast. Retrieved January 16, 2018.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  16. ^ "Memorandum: On the Pseudoscience of Homeopathy". klnran.ru (in Russian). Russian Academy of Sciences. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  17. ^ "Homöopathie ist Pseudowissenschaft - nun offiziell in Russland - Übersetzung des Memorandums und der Pressemitteilung" [Homeopathy is Pseudoscience - Now Officially in Russia - Translation of the Memoranda and the Press Release]. .netzwerk-homoeopathie.eu (in German). February 8, 2017. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  18. ^ Feldwisch-Drentrup, Hinnerk (February 2, 2016). "Schlagwort: ehemaligen Alternativmedizinerin Natalie Grams" [Catchphrase: Ex-Alternative Medicine Practitioner Natalie Grams]. brightsblog.wordpress.com (in German). Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  19. ^ "Als wäre ich aus einer Sekte ausgestiegen" [As if I Escaped From a Cult]. Welt online (in German). August 29, 2015. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  20. ^ "Aus meiner Sicht ist das Pharmawerbung" [In my View it's Pharma Advertising]. Spiegel Online (in German). December 6, 2016. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  21. ^ "Die Nestbeschmutzerin" [The Whistleblower]. Zeit Online (in German). May 15, 2016. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  22. ^ "Die Ketzerin" [The Heretic]. brand eins online (in German). September 2016. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  23. ^ "Warum Natalie Grams mit der Homöopathie gebrochen hat" [Why Natalie Grams Broke with Homeopathy]. Stern Online (in German). November 25, 2015. Archived from the original on August 29, 2017. Retrieved May 15, 2016.
  24. ^ a b "Wissenschaft ist eine Methode, kein Weltbild" [Science is a Method, not a Worldview]. Laborjournal online (in German). October 1, 2015. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  25. ^ "100 Fragen live an Natalie Grams" [100 Questions Live on Natalie Grams]. ZDF heute auf Facebook (in German). February 7, 2017. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  26. ^ "Eine Ärztin erzählt, warum sie nicht mehr mit Homöopathie behandelt" [A Physician Tells Why She no Longer Treats with Homeopathy]. Welt online (in German). April 28, 2017. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  27. ^ "Ärztin Natalie Grams über die besonderen Eigenschaften der Homöopathie" [Physician Natalie Grams on the Special Qualities of Homeopathy]. WDR1 (in German). May 10, 2017. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  28. ^ Lanz, Markus (May 10, 2017). "Dr. Natalie Grams, Ärztin - Jahrelang praktizierte sie als überzeugte Homöopathin" [Dr. Natalie Grams, Physician - For Years She Practiced as a Believing Homeopath]. ZDF (in German). 58m05s. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  29. ^ "Eine Frage des Glaubens - Homöopathie auf dem Prüfstand" [A Question Faith - Homeopathy on the Test Bench]. Deutschlandfunk (in German). May 12, 2017. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  30. ^ "Wirksame Medizin oder Geldverschwendung?" [Effective Medicine or Waste of Money?]. SWR (in German). May 9, 2017. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  31. ^ "Das Geschäft mit dem Öko-Trend" [The Eco-Trendy Business]. taz Online (in German). May 15, 2017. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  32. ^ "Warum Krankenkassen endlich aufhören sollten, für Homöopathie zu bezahlen" [Why Health Insurance Funds Should Finally Stop Paying for Homeopathy]. Motherboard (in German). June 3, 2016. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  33. ^ "Dr. Natalie Grams". SkepKon. Archived from the original on January 17, 2018. Retrieved January 17, 2018.
  34. ^ Soldt, Rüdiger. "Den Homöopathen soll es an die Globuli gehen" [Homeopaths Should go to Globules]. faz.net (in German). Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  35. ^ "Homöopathiekritiker starten Informations-Netzwerk" [Homeopathy Critics Start Information Network]. deutsche-apotheker-zeitung.de (in German). February 1, 2016. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  36. ^ "Netzwerk Homöopathie" [Homeopathy Network]. netzwerk-homoeopathie.eu (in German). Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  37. ^ Anlauf, Manfred; Aust, Norbert; Bertelsen, Hans-Werner; Boscheinen, Juliana; Ernst, Edzard; Friedrich, Daniel R.; Grams, Natalie; et al. (August 21, 2017). "Münsteraner Memorandum Heilpraktiker: Ein Statement der interdisziplinären Expertengruppe "Münsteraner Kreis" zu einer Neuregelung des Heilpraktikerwesens" [Münster Memorandum on Alternative Practitioners: A Statement of the Interdisciplinary Expert Group "Münster Roundtable" on a New Regulation on the Character of Alternative Practitioners] (PDF) (in German). Archived (PDF) from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved January 13, 2018.
  38. ^ "If the profession of medical practitioner abolished?". presse-nachrichten.de. August 23, 2017. Archived from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved January 13, 2018.
  39. ^ "Medizin falsch gedacht: Rezension über Natalie Grams "neu gedachte" Homöopathie" [Medicine Thought Wrong: Review of Natalie Grams' "Reconsidered" Homeopathy]. homoeopathie-online.info (in German). August 3, 2015. Archived from the original on January 12, 2018. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  40. ^ "Stellungnahme zu: Natalie Grams "Homöopathie neu gedacht"" [Comment on: Natalie Grams' "Homeopathy Reconsidered"]. vkhd.de (in German). Archived from the original on August 29, 2017. Retrieved January 12, 2018.
  41. ^ Pintér, András; Levin, Jelena; Böckman, Pontus (November 24, 2017). "Episode #100 — Superheroes of Skepticism" (MP3). soundcloud.com. 22m36s: The Europeean Skeptics Podcast. Retrieved January 16, 2018.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: location (link)
  42. ^ Corinna Hartmann (September 5, 2017). "Gesundheitssystem: Homöopathie kann gefährlich sein" [Health System: Homeopathy Can be Hazardous]. spektrum.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved September 11, 2017. Der Zweifel kam, als ich lernte, dass Erfahrung bei der Wirksamkeitsbewertung einer Therapie nicht entscheidend ist, sondern das Ergebnis klinischer Studien.
  43. ^ Weber, Nina. "Homöopathie-Kongress in Leipzig: "Humbug"" [Homeopathy Congress in Leipzig: "Nonsense"]. spiegel.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved January 13, 2018. Fakt ist: Wir haben keinen Anlass zu glauben, dass homöopathische Medikamente eine Wirkung haben, die über den Placebo-Effekt hinausgeht. Wenn eine Gruppe Ärzte standhaft behauptet, dass Homöopathie wirkt, muss man - zum Wohle der Patienten - widersprechen.
  44. ^ Nicolai, Frank. "Von der Homöopathin zur aktiven Homöopathie-Kritikerin" [From Homeopath to Active Homeopathy Critic]. hpd.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved January 13, 2018. Ich habe erst durch ein Buch von Kahneman verstanden, das sich mit „schnellem und langsamen Denken" beschäftigt, dass ich der Homöopathie mit meinem schnellen intuitiven Denken, vielleicht „Bauchgefühlsdenken", angehangen habe, während ich sonst schon in der Lage zu rational-analytischem, also langsamen, Denken war. Ich habe die kognitive Dissonanz vermieden, indem ich die Homöopathie erst sehr spät auch rational hinterfragt habe.
  45. ^ Eppner, Andrea. "Weil sie nicht mehr an Homöopathie glaubte, schloss sie ihre Praxis" [Because She No Longer Believed in Homeopathy, She Closed her Practice]. merkur.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved January 13, 2018. Auslöser war ein Buch, das ich zur Verteidigung der Homöopathie schreiben wollte – als Reaktion auf das Buch „Die Homöopathie-Lüge". Bei der Recherche habe ich nach Argumenten gesucht, um die Erfolge, die ich jeden Tag mit Homöopathie erlebte, auch wissenschaftlich begründen zu können. Doch so sehr ich gesucht habe, ich musste feststellen: Es bleibt nicht viel übrig.
  46. ^ Schmitz, Thorsten. "Die Globulisierungsgegnerin" [The Opponent of Globulization]. sueddeutsche.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved January 13, 2018. Homöopathie wirkt, weil wir als Homöopathen und weil unsere Patienten die Vorstellung haben, dass sie wirke.
  47. ^ Mützel, Daniel. "Gegen den "Irrsinn": Wissenschaftler fordern Abschaffung des Heilpraktikerberufs" [Against the "Madness": Scientists Demand Abolition of Alternative Practitioner Profession]. motherboard.vice.com (in German). Archived from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved January 13, 2018. Das war hart für mich, ich war da selbst so tief drin.
  48. ^ Albrecht, Bernhard. "Warum Natalie Grams mit der Homöopathie gebrochen hat" [Why Natalie Grams Broke with Homeopathy]. stern.de (in German). Archived from the original on August 29, 2017. Retrieved January 13, 2018. ...Hahnemann war sehr klug, er hinterfragte alles, und die Medizin, gegen die er damals rebellierte, war beherrscht von Aberglauben und Therapien, die lebensgefährlich für die Patienten waren. Die Homöopathie war damals das kleinere Übel...
  49. ^ Wirsching, Stefanie. "Warum eine Ärztin plötzlich ihre Meinung ändert" [Why a Physician Abruptly Changes her Mind]. augsburger-allgemeine.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved January 13, 2018. Hahnemann hat sich getäucht.
  50. ^ Sudholt, Eva. ""Als wäre ich aus einer Sekte ausgestiegen"" ["As If I Escaped From a Cult"]. welt.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved January 13, 2018. Die Homöopathie ist selbst ein Patient. Es fehlt ihr an Daten und Fakten, sie halluziniert und will ihre Krankheit nicht wahrhaben. Aber Krankheitseinsicht kann ein erster Schritt zur Genesung sein.
  51. ^ "Natalie Grams Ex-Homöopathin: "Globuli sind Betrug am Patienten"" [Natalie Grams Ex-Homeopath: "Globules are Deceit of Patients"]. berliner-kurier.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved January 13, 2018. Bei der Homöopathie geht eine Wirksamkeit nicht über ein Placebo hinaus. Was nicht verwunderlich ist, da ihre Medikamente nichts enthalten.
  52. ^ Nicolai, Frank. "Von der Homöopathin zur aktiven Homöopathie-Kritikerin" [From Homeopath to Active Homeopathy Critic]. hpd.de (in German). Archived from the original on January 13, 2018. Retrieved January 13, 2018. Mir kam die Homöopathie immer wie so eine Art "Parallelwissen" vor, dass genauso erlaubt und berechtigt ist wie das naturwissenschaftliche Wissen. Es war schwer einzusehen, wie sehr ich mich da getäuscht habe.
[edit]

TODO at publication

[edit]
Image:Fullsizeoutput 2a23.jpg||[[Natalie Grams]], German physician, author and [[Science communication|science communicator]], was a student at LMU Munich.
* [[Natalie Grams]], German physician, author and [[Science communication|science communicator]]
  • DYK (hooks < 200 characters)
    • Hook (187): 
      * ... that German author '''[[Natalie Grams]]''' set out to write a scientific defense of [[Homeopathy|homeopathy]], but instead became a prominent expert critic of the discipline after penning ''Homeopathy Reconsidered''?
    • ALT1 (199): 
      * ... that German author and anti-[[Homeopathy|homeopathy]] campaigner '''[[Natalie Grams]]''' advocates "better medicine", in which mainstream health systems adopt elements of alternative medicine's focused attention to patients?
    • ALT2 (199): 
      * ... that German author and physician '''[[Natalie Grams]]''' wants health systems to adopt a key aspect of [[Homeopathy|homeopathy]] — elevated attentiveness to patients — but not its scientifically implausible theory of action?

Categories (remove section header on publication)

[edit]
{{DEFAULTSORT:Grams, Natalie}}
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:1978 births]]
[[Category:21st-century German physicians]]
[[Category:German women physicians]]
[[Category:People from Bavaria]]
[[Category:Writers from Bavaria]]
[[Category:German women writers]]
[[Category:21st-century German writers]]
[[Category:21st-century German women writers]]
[[Category:German skeptics]]
[[Category:Critics of alternative medicine]]
[[Category:Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich alumni]]
[[Category:Technical University of Munich alumni]]
[[Category:Heidelberg University alumni]]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Poorlyglot/sandbox/002&oldid=1092674876"