User talk:Emarsee

	Talk Page Archives
	1 2 3 4 5 6

This user may have left Wikipedia. Emarsee has not edited Wikipedia since August 2017. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome to Emarsee’s talk page. Here are some tips to help you communicate with me:

If I left a message on your talk page, please post a reply to my talk page. I might be unable to see your message if you post it on your talk page.

Thus, if I have left a message on your talk page please post a reply here.

If you choose to not respond on my talk page, please use a talkback template, {{tb|Insert your username here}}.
Add or respond to an existing conversation under the existing heading.

Indent your comment when replying by using an appropriate number of colons ':'.
Create a new heading if the original conversation is archived.

To initiate a new conversation on this page click on this link.
Remember to post new messages at the bottom of my talk page.
I will not continue on with a conversation if it involves off-Wikipedia conversation. (eg, telephone, email, IM, social networking, etc.) If you have concerns that you are uncomfortable to discuss on Wikipedia, use the Email this user tool.
You should sign your comments. You can do this automatically by typing four tildes (~~~~).
Thank you. █ EMARSEE

Committed identity:

3FB3924C9AC7262A08E3E690E0AD6DB62B45D76AD04E608C724D5D49288F0049 2FA311B9C5ED88DE4F98F927F34A736943D19D815DD8075216541797C476C739 is a SHA-512 commitment to this user's real-life identity.

CHCT/CHCO-TV Content

Emarsee,

Yes I do have close relationship with this station.

CHCO-TV Broadcast Certificate# T-7335 File# 6206-08476

I don't know how to change the page name to CHCO-TV.

Thanks for helping keep our information up to date.

Patrick — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pnwatt (talk • contribs) 04:12, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fix up the City HD logo.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:City_HD_logo.svg

Emarsee, care to fix this logo for me? (FreshCorp619 (talk) 00:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC))[reply]

It looks like you managed to embed a raster image inside a SVG file, which pretty much defeats the purpose of having an SVG file. I'll fix the logo soon though. █ EMARSEE 00:46, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete my edit?

I am confused about what you meant in your edit description. I don't see any reason to delete what I wrote. This is about the CBC News article.

I can't exactly say the source you cited can be considered to be reliable, LifeSiteNews isn't a well established news organization and a organization linked with the CPC isn't likely able to make a unbiased decision on whether CBC's news is "liberal" or not. The site claims the CBC "has gained a firm reputation in Canada for its heavy liberal slant" without substantiating that claim. You would be better off with a source that makes mention of CBC News' alleged bias from reliable and well established news organization like The Globe and Mail or the National Post. █ EMARSEE 02:02, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable and well established - The Globe and Mail?

Now it's obvious to me that Wikipedia panders to the epitome of Journalistic bias and lack of journalistic integrity. http://www.canpalnet.ca/mambo/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=185&Itemid=1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by AshyCrow (talk • contribs) 03:57, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thumbnails

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ABronydoc_logo.jpg&diff=534275499&oldid=534267189 It doesn't update the most recent thumbnail until you upload a new picture for the file, and then, the most recent one takes on the appearance of the old image. I think this is a Wikipedia bug someone with more power than us needs to fix. dogman15 (talk) 17:21, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've noticed that. A forced refresh of the page normally solves the problem and generates a new thumbnail for the image. I have no idea why its only the Bronycon doc image that's problematic, but someone *really* needs to fix this. █ EMARSEE 06:38, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For a while, there were also problems with the display of this image's updates. dogman15 (talk) 06:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Dear Emarsee,

I am writing to you with reference to the contribution in which you delete from Harbour Centre. What you deem constructive and what the general public aka our guests deem as constructive may be two different things. The information was provided inform people about interesting information and views regarding the viewing deck.

(VancouverLookout (talk) 20:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC))[reply]

February 2013

Dear Emarsee,

I am writing to you with reference to the contribution in which you delete from Harbour Centre. What you deem constructive and what the general public aka our guests deem as constructive may be two different things. The information was provided inform people about interesting information and views regarding the viewing deck.

The information provided was just like information provided on the Space Needle page but regarding the Vancouver Lookout

(VancouverLookout (talk) 21:00, 19 February 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Palm trees in BC.....

RE this edit - probably the same person obsessively tried to feature this in the Vancouverarticle, using pics of the palms on the English Bay waterfront as if they were common; and got into something of an edit war over it; I see they're back. Many trees in BC are exogenous; the monkey-puzzle comes to mind as much more visible, also the rhododendron and azalea and decorative bamboo which are very very common as you may know. The palm trees thing is jejune, someone's obsession; trying to prove that BC is "Canada's tropics" or whatever....Skookum1 (talk) 03:35, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR violation at Family Channel

I haven't reported you for this, but I thought I'd let you know that you violated WP:3RR at Family Channel by reverting 4 times in a 24-hour period. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 05:41, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yearbook Awards

I suppose that Eric Hamber's Yearbook awards "[don't] seem to be... notable" I wonder about Prince of Wales' Secondary's page... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_of_Wales_Secondary_School Unless you have some sort of bias... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.250.209.44 (talk) 08:02, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No bias here. The article didn't pop on my radar (last relevant edit was in June so I might have missed it then) so no action was taken. █ EMARSEE 06:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Super Channel (Canada) logo

Hello,

I'm connected with Super Channel. The logo that you've posted to the Super Channel wiki page is outdated. If we supplied you with a current logo, would you be able to replace it for us?

Thanks, Brad - Super Channel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Burner21X (talk • contribs) 20:45, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Emarsee; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:16, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Constructivity

Hey.

Could you explain what makes this not constructive?

I think it's valid if its under the subheading ==controversy==

If you could tell me how the points in this post aren't valid, or how I can make them valid to stay ON the page, that'd be great. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AshyCrow (talk • contribs) 03:22, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you don't understand how Wikipedia work - content on Wikipedia needs to be neutral and verifiable. In order for a article to be verifiable, it needs to be back by reliable sources. As it currently stand, your contributions are nothing more than mere opinion and are not backed up by any sources (your blog does not count as a source). Wikipedia is not a soapbox for dissenting opinions, if this was the case, we could fill up Christy Clark's page with endless commentary on controversy x and y and distract the reader from learning about her biography or her political positions. I'll welcome your reply on this matter, but I'll be reverting your edit as its unacceptable in its current state.

I did ask how we could make these what you call, 'claims', valid. There is lots in the article that I could point to that isn't 'neutral'. For example, the article fails to show where some of the Dolphin that have been SHOWCASED at the aquarium are actually from. If you want to use google to find a website that's VERIFIABLE, please do, as there are many links that point to the fact that the Dolphin were purchased from the Futo Dolphin Drives. There is also lots of information to help someone like you, understand what sort of industry the Aquarium supported by committing to this purchase.

The contributions to this article fail to provide verifiable facts as to why its educational for an animal to be contained within 9,500,000 liters of water as opposed to living freely in the ocean. Lots of articles have controversy contrary to the official definition of the institution. Why is this so different? This isn't the only aquarium in the world that has been challenged by these ideas. BUT, it is one of only two or three aquariums in the world that hold in captivity, whales and dolphins.

And please don't compare the matters of Christy Clark's life to obvious manipulation of the public. If wikipedia is really supposed to be about INFORMING people, then people who are unaware of the inner workings of aquariums should be informed and as the aquarium likes to state, educated.

Thanks

It's not my job to cite or reference your claims, I don't care if the aquarium is the site of the second coming of Jesus - the onus is on you to find a reliable source to back up your claims. Consider reading WP:SOAPBOX and see why your revisions to the article are currently unacceptable under Wikipedia policy - it has nothing to do with the ethical stance of the aquarium but rather Wikipedia's commitment to highlight information in a neutral manner. In other words, we're going to have to look at this issue from BOTH sides of the story (including the Vanaqua's) █ EMARSEE 04:05, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

School SVG logos

Although you do TV/Radio, Can you convert the following images to SVG and fix up the raster images for me Emarsee?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BAA_1989_Logo.png (please remove the red parts of the gold portion except inside the blue)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:High_School_Crest.png (rename that to BCS Brebeuf Logo.svg please)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BCNCHS_Logo.PNG
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BMTCSS_logo_2012.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BPJPIICSS_Logo.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:DBCSS_Logo.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FHCCSS_Logo.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FJRCSS_Logo.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FLCHS_Logo.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:JVCSS_Logo.PNG
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MWCSS_Logo.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MPSJHS_Logo.png (make it more HD-friendly)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MPJCSS_Logo.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MMCSS_Logo.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SOCS_Logo_1963.png
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Morrow_Park.png (rename that to SJMPCSS Logo.svg please)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SPCSS_Logo.png

Thanks!

FreshCorp619 (talk) 13:24, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've love to help, but I'm quite caught up with studying for finals at the moment. I'd suggest asking the good people at WP:GL for help with vectoring these images. █ EMARSEE 01:08, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Global National 2013,jpg.png

A tag has been placed on File:Global National 2013,jpg.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. █ EMARSEE 18:55, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:BC Conservative Party Logo.png)

Thanks for uploading File:BC Conservative Party Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Golden Village

Hi, I noticed that deletion of the "second-largest Chinese community in North America and its cite, partly because it's a COI cite to a Golden Village website, partly because it's not just Golden Village that comprisess that "second-largest" thingie; it's been a pissing contest for a long time between various North American Chinatown pages for a long time; see Talk:Chinatown and its archives about this. "is claimed to be by xxx" should be in the text given.Skookum1 (talk) 01:45, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I see, thanks for telling me about this. █ EMARSEE 07:08, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Abbotsford re "aetheism" (more like agnosticism/apathy) re Bible Belt

That edit, given its April 30 date, might have something to do with this poll reported on the HuffPo but no specifics on Abby are given, nor a link to the Humanist Assn's poll; it's probably broken down by region. I'm from Mission and the stats don't surprise me despite the Bible Belt tone of the Central and Eastern Valley, particularly on the south side of the river though "Bible Belt" has often been (somewhat incorrectly) used to include the Ridge and Mission. For years, Abby's character has had a huge secular and anti-religious population; partly a reaction of course to the strength of the Mennonite and Dutch Reformed churches and various neo-Christian sects like the Bethel Temple (one of my neighbours married into that, said they were Holy rollers LOL). Abby has always been a biker and fighter town, also, despite the presence and strength of the churches and religious element. Polarities, that's pretty much anywhere in BC. BC has always had a higher rate of "non-religion" and also exotic religions like Buddhism (non-Asian Buddhists I mean) and the Emissaries of the Divine Light and more. That it's now a majority, according to that poll, which has a POV basis of course, is not all that surprising....even in Abbotsford. Whether that poll can be found to be cited remains unclear, not sure what StatsCan says for the Mission-Abbotsford census area.Skookum1 (talk) 06:06, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, I have to commend you on your wonderful insight, I don't live in the Valley and I'm surprised by the level of irreligiousness in Abby/Mission. I've found the poll online and there is a breakdown of religiousness by region, but I'm quite certain that Abbotsford and the rest of the FVRD is lumped under "Interior" or "Rest of Mainland" - but that doesn't really tell us anything. I'd rather wait for StatsCan to release the relevant census data on religion (and they're really dragging their feet on that) in BC, there wouldn't be any problems with POV as it comes from a neutral source. █ EMARSEE 07:29, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

def wouldn't be Interior; is there Lower Mainland?Skookum1 (talk) 11:48, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

just looking for religion data from StatsCan/census, not sure it's in the community profile for Mission-Abby CMA, we'll see. Just wanted to comment that it's odd that Abby and Chilliwack and Langley don't have religion sections.....but note that the sports section is detailed. Gives you an idea of contributors' priorities, perhaps their a-religiosity.Skookum1 (talk) 13:17, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Only census data is by province, I guess you have to pay to get detailed local info. Never used to be that way with the census, now all pay-for whenever they can make an excuse (data is valuable of course); and now with the long-form census going the way of the dodo bird we won't have figures for a lot of things in future.....Skookum1 (talk) 13:23, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Here's a link to the poll: [1], regions are broken down into Metro Vancouver, Interior and Vancouver Island - there's no Lower Mainland.

Religious beliefs are still accessible on StatsCan, but its very well hidden under the 2001 census. They can be found here for Abbotsford █ EMARSEE 17:04, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

They must be adding the FVRD and possibly the SLRD to "Metro Vancouver" as no way would Abby be lumped with the Interior or the Island. Metro Vancouver is a misnomer anyway, the name of the regional district is still the Greater Vancouver Regional District; "Greater Vancouver" remains a geographic reference, but here's a case where the GVRD Board's rebranding has been taken that one step further; probably ignorance on the part of the pollster, who's probably in Toronto.Skookum1 (talk) 00:58, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[outdent] Just looked at the Abby-Mission CMA religion figures on the cite you gave; the point there is that unlike the Humanist Assn's poll, the census didn't ask anything about how often people go to church, or if at all. I was baptized United Church, haven't gone since I was 12 or so other than to funerals etc.- but in the census I might self-identify as "Protestant" (the largest group in the Abby census) without ever going to church or "being religious".Skookum1 (talk) 02:49, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

comment re edit comment on BCGP

"Or are we thinking anything left of centre = socialism?" - actually, anything left of extreme right is what that crowd will say "socialism" for, if not "communism" which you'd also hear sometimes, and often still do.Skookum1 (talk) 08:52, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Palm trees

A good 20 times at least, in fact, it's been debated/deleted; another pic was placed on Climate of Vancouver which may yet be re-placed by the "palm tree fetishist". I'm all for a Flora of Vancouver article with an "Exotics and imports" section, with Japanese maple, Japanese cherry, monkeypuzzle, rhododendrons, azaleas, boxwood, a certain large-leaf shrub we call "laurel" but isn't daphnis, a few species of ornamental bamboo, all common in private and civic landscaping, and sundry but palm trees are scarcely high up the list in terms of frequency or notability. The premise of painting Vancouver as sub-tropical, which is the implication, is an old conceit about the place.Skookum1 (talk) 05:05, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edits?

Why did you revert my edits on the Kwantlen Polytechnic University page? I am an employee of the Kwantlen Marketing Department and was asigned to update our Wiki page. All information is relevent and up to date! please do not revert it back to normal again. Thank you!

I somehow doubt that actually work with Kwantlen, but if you are please read WP:COI, WP:COPYVIO, and WP:NPOV to see why your edits aren't up to snuff. I will continue to revert your edits if they do not fall within Wikipedia's policies. █ EMARSEE 17:06, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why i believe CTV and CTV Two should share a template…

Hello, Emarsee. i appreciate your work in regards to Canadian television! However, i disagree with your decision to have CTV and CTV Two in two separate templates rather than one. Why? Because the CTV Two stations are no longer notable enough to justify a separate template box for them. Less than a decade ago, A Channel has exclusive shows (many simsubbed) to compete with other networks. Now, CTV Two is mostly a downgraded version of CTV, as the following schedule summary shows.

Weekdays
On CTV Two, ¾ of the time between 10h and 18h is devoted to shows also airing on the original CTV:

Show	Broadcast time
Show	CTV	CTV Two
Ellen	16h	10h
Marilyn	10h	11h and 14h
Anderson	17h	15h
Dr. Oz	14h	16h
eTalk	19h	17h

The remaining is disappointing: reruns of Degrassi and Corner Gas count as Canadian content (30 minutes each), plus an hour is devoted to American simsubs. As for primetime and early mornings, almost all shows are filler.

Weekends
Weekends are even worse. 27% of the time, it's a CTV Movie. Another 12½% is devoted to local infomercials or paid programming. The remaining 60½%? Reruns, simsubs and other filler.

Overall, CTV Two lacks the notability found on other secondary networks, such as BBC Two and the proposed CBC-2. i think the best approach would be to ask several Wikipedians whether it would be best to have one template for the two CTV brands or one template per brand. Please let me know what you think!

Thanks, --True Tech Talk Time (talk) 02:36, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(Please post a reply on my talk page.)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Global National 2010.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Global National 2010.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Ckckbbs.svg)

Thanks for uploading File:Ckckbbs.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:08, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of update

Hi Emarsee,

You recently deleted my update to the Vancouver Sun Run that outlined the efforts they are making to green their event on the basis that this is not relevant. I would beg to disagree as many running events are taking initiatives to reduce their environmental footprint. The information is from a reliable source and I think it should be re-instated.

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nicki Casley (talk • contribs) 06:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't exactly call the references you cited as reliable, especially when they seem so self-congratulating, check out WP:RS for information. Please also read WP:UNDUE to see why the adding the "greening" initiatives does not provide significant value to the article. █ EMARSEE 20:30, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Emarsee. You have new messages at Talk:Pitt Meadows.
Message added 01:56, 22 June 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:56, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kwantlen editing

Emarsee,

Yesterday, I had edited the section on the Kwantlen Polytechnic University campuses. I had re-written the content found on the Kwantlen campus webpages and sourced them appropriately. However, you stated it was a "copyright" violation.

Today, I re-edited the campus information, writing all the material from scratch, and not using any material directly from the Kwantlen campus webpages and thus did not source them. The context of all the information updated was neutral (not breaching the "Neutrality" policy) and should not have infringed on the Copyright either. However, you cited both a "Copyright" and now a "Conflict of interest" breach.

How do you suggest I add informative information about Kwantlen and its campuses, similar to other post-secondary institutions such as UBC, SFU, or even Duke University (which was sourced as an ideal post-secondary page in my research) that will comply with Wikipedia policies and your standards?

Ddryden87 (talk) 17:30, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your interest in editing Wikipedia, we've had quite a few people put copyrighted material onto Kwantlen's article and this is not allowed under Wikipedia's copyright policy. All text should be written with a neutral point of view that does not under any circumstance promote the organization in question. Unless I'm mistaken, you seem to be currently enrolled in Kwantlen - this doesn't mean you aren't allowed to edit the article, but you should take serious consideration whether your text is overtly promotional in nature.

Words such as "technologically advanced" or "specifically designed" should be avoided per WP:WORDS to avoid any potential bias. In addition, Wikipedia isn't a gallery; two or three images should be more than enough for the entire section. As you've already uploaded your images to Wikimedia Commons, create a gallery for Kwantlen and link it to the Wikipedia page. █ EMARSEE 19:52, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. Indeed I am currently enrolled in Kwantlen (hence how I originally came across this page). After some quick reading, I noticed that it lacked a lot of information and also contained some outdated information. When I researched other local post-secondary institutions Wikipedia pages, they seemed very detailed and informative, so I wanted to contribute to updating the Kwantlen page.

As a new member to Wikipedia, I attempted to do my due diligence in following all of the policies. However, I will take your feedback and re-edit my work to further comply as best as possible. In addition, I will also create that gallery as per your suggestion and try to link it in. Let me know if I continue to incidentally breach any further Wikipedia regulations.

Ddryden87 (talk) 21:02, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Richmond Secondary School Notable Alumni

My recent addition of "Gloria Tang" in the Notable Alumni section was reverted. I am curious as to why my fully referenced edit was rejected. A quick search of "2013 Miss Chinese International Pageant winner" and "2012 Miss Chinese Vancouver Pageant winner" will result in "Gloria Tang" in many articles and news publications. The Richmond Review is a reputable news source within Richmond, B.C. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nitroxyl (talk • contribs) 05:31, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If the person in question has an article, they can be listed under the notable alumni section, if not, they do not belong on the list. █ EMARSEE 05:41, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BC 99

In regards to your comment, the map is included on d:Q919039 on Wikidata, which the article is linked to. The infobox will display the linked map if the map= field is not present, allowing for increased information sharing across different language Wikipedias. --Rs chen 7754 01:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Change to CRTC Page

Hi Emarsee,

I would appreciate it if you do not delete any more changes to the CRTC page (Adding of Vice Chairs and Commissioners). I represent the CRTC and this information is not excessive and is very relevant as the CRTC is a public service organization, and part of our iniative is adding the most information for Canadians. Therefore the more information the better. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polanco76 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Change to CRTC Page

Would I be able to make instead a separate page for the vice chairs and commissioners and have a link to it from CRTC page? If not the commissioners then a separate page for just the vice chairs then and only the current commissioners? Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polanco76 (talk • contribs) 19:17, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Change to CRTC Page

Would you know possibly how to go about proposing a new page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Polanco76 (talk • contribs) 19:01, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TV channels logos

Hello. I recently bumped into one of those wiki trolls who register only to remove images from random articles just because they're part of a gallery. I don't have time or patience to deal with all that rules mumbo-jumbo and politics, so I'm looking for help and input from you since you contribute to many TV-related articles. Here's the thing, all images from article Vrak.TV except the one in infobox were removed, including those from Canal Famille, stating various parts of WP:NFG. Yet, the WP:TVS ("Use of images in articles" section) is aware of those rules, but still suggests "the purpose of a historical logo gallery is to illustrate the evolution of a television station's branding over the years".

So, what does that mean? When a television or radio station rebrands or make a major logo change, is it common use to flush any if not all past logos like if it's not encyclopedic or never existed? It just doesn't make logic sense. What's the point of Logo of NBC and American Broadcasting Company logos then? I gave up partially on english wiki a few months ago, I don't want to get into wiki politics again. Thanks. InMontreal (talk) 22:52, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:CHWK-FM 89-5 The Hawk logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:CHWK-FM 89-5 The Hawk logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:56, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Thecanadiantentinabox

Hi Emarsee, are you planning to file an SPI regarding Thecanadiantentinabox (talk · contribs)? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:36, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm working on it. █ EMARSEE 02:39, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I was just checking before I did the same thing. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:49, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And it looks like the user just admitted it, looks like it's pretty much an open and shut case to me. █ EMARSEE 02:52, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: "Channel" or "Network"

Someone moved the Speed Channel article to use "network" instead of "channel" as its disambiguation because he argued the term was incorrect in this context; specifically, a channel should only refer to frequencies, while the term "network" should be used to refer to their contents. ViperSnake151 Talk 14:57, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Bradley Manning/October 2013 move request

Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:28, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Metros

Where are you getting your definition of Metros? 117Avenue (talk) 22:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From the Wikipedia article, let's see the definition the article gives and see how it's relates to SkyTrain.

A rapid transit system is a public transport system in an

urban area with high capacity Y - Skytrian connects the high density downtown core with high density transit orientated suburbs.
high frequency not needing timetables Y - up to 120 second frequency
is fast and is segregated from other traffic. Y - No grade crossings
Operating on an exclusive right of way Y - Does not interact with car or other rail traffic.
rapid transit systems are typically grade separated Y - See below
located either in underground tunnels (subways) or elevated above street level (elevated transit line) Y - Yes for both, half of Canada Line is a subway and the Downtown portion is also a subway, the vast majority of the rest of the system is elevated.

I'm not really sure why you're calling it a light rail system when it shares barely any features of a typical light rail system (e.g. at grade, no ROW, etc.) I agree that the system is not a full metro like the subways in NYC or Toronto, but it still meets the requirement of a rapid transit system and should be classified as such. █ EMARSEE 22:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought that light rail and metros were both forms of rapid transit. But you're saying metro is synonymous with rapid transit? Then why is Rapid transit and List of metro systems located at different names? 117Avenue (talk) 23:06, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The terminology can be quite confusing. Lists of rapid transit systems lists many different forms of transportation including metros and LRTs. I'd refer to Passenger rail terminology for a more detailed explanation of the terminology. █ EMARSEE 23:26, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Template

That rule does not apply in an instance in which the initial justification is invalid. The former was resolved, but the latter was added without an explanation at the time. But since then initial template, you have elaborated and stated that this section is more detailed than others, which is a correct interpretation of the "undue" section. However, I have pointed out that the topic deserves such treatment, as evidenced by its extensive coverage in the media and its obvious importance. Something should never be deemed "undue" merely because an article is a stub and some addition seems to be "too large". That is a misinterpretation of the guideline you are referencing.

If such behavior were permitted, anybody could label something without justification and revert to the three revert rule in order to keep it legit.

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Simultaneous substitution, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vanessa logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vanessa logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 18:30, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hubbard Broadcasting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KLCK (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:BC Conservatives 2013 Logo.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:BC Conservatives 2013 Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 01:17, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Revert Notice Posted On Talk Page

Hi,

I think you accidentally posted a notice on my page. You said you reverted one of my edits, but you never, I checked my edit history; however, I noticed you did revert a user's edits (which were not mine) on the Kids' CBC article, which is the only one, out of ten articles that I frequently edit. I hope this was a mistake and I forgive you for it, as we all make mistakes. Ziva 84 (talk) 14:13, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's ok, we all make mistakes. Ziva 84 (talk) 16:29, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to BBC Canada does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 17:54, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent revert at List of programs broadcast by Teletoon Retro

Please stop removing content without making a bare minimum of effort to ascertain its validity. You previously did so at List of programs broadcast by Teletoon (leading to the discussion at User talk:Dogmaticeclectic#Teletoon programs), and now you did so again. This case seems far stranger to me than the previous one - of course the show wasn't listed at the website, since the schedule was quite obviously down at that time! A simple check elsewhere should have sufficed. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 22:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that was a mistake on my part. Checked the schedule, which didn't load and also checked the list of shows listed on their website which didn't list Johnny Bravo. I'll keep that in mind. █ EMARSEE 22:40, 16 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Shaw Media, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Halifax (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Breakenridge/Harrison

Re this, it may be that this coverage is hurting his real estate values some..... there may also be a more recent report than the FVRD one the Breakenridge item is based on, there's been lots of coverage over the years here and there; there's other landslips waiting to happen in BC that are even scarier but this one they at least did a geohazard study on....and maybe there is a new government report saying different; but who wrote it, and were they paid to come up with different results; how reliable is that report. Because a government says something is safe that doesn't mean piss-all cf Hurricane Katrina. You were right to delete the rant but it may be that there's further citations to add yet; not that they're right. Myself I'd worry more about Baker blowing or the Fraser Canyon collapsing or The Barrier coming down, but it's not like Breakenridge is just any old mountain...Skookum1 (talk) 09:04, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Clark left

Mr. Clark left the school to work as principal of Panorama Elementary, and Mr. Lloyd became the new vice principal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.98.114.57 (talk) 02:29, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:YTV logo 2009.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:YTV logo 2009.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:36, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 107.7 FM Surrey, British Columbia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on 107.7 FM Surrey, British Columbia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 331dot (talk) 00:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Your mass reverts of User:ClassicOnAStick's additions of pre-launch channel names are harmful to the encyclopedia. I understand that they should be cited, but in all of the cases I looked at there was an incredibly obvious and easy-to-add source: the CRTC website. Reverting these edits is not the correct course of action here - citing them is. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 17:03, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited CJAX-FM, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Squamish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:23, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zee Cinema.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zee Cinema.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:37, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Jackfmcklg.png

Thank you for uploading File:Jackfmcklg.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Marchjuly (talk) 05:51, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Vivatv.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Vivatv.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TWN Logo 2011.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TWN Logo 2011.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Superchannel.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Superchannel.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:46, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Superecran.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Superecran.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:14, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:GlobalThunder20Bay20CHFD.PNG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GlobalThunder20Bay20CHFD.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Global Morning News.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Global Morning News.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KDNB-LD

The article KDNB-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The station never went to air; its construction permit expired unbuilt. Stations that never launched do not enjoy the presumption of notability assumed for established/operating stations, and as it would have been a satellite repeater of Daystar its independent notability would have been questionable at best.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ckws.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ckws.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gracetv.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gracetv.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CKWS TV logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CKWS TV logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Emarsee. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 600 AM Vancouver for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 600 AM Vancouver is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/600 AM Vancouver until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 17:03, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for input

Hey there Emarsee, as a regular contributor to helping improve Canadian TV channel articles on Wikipedia, I'd like to invite you to contribute to your input into the discussion taking part on Talk:The Biography Channel (Canada), regarding the movement of The Biography Channel (Canada) to a new article on Viceland (Canada). Your input would be appreciated. musimax. (talk) 20:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Request for input

Hey there Stickguy, as a regular contributor to helping improve Canadian TV channel articles on Wikipedia, I'd like to invite you to contribute to your input into the discussion taking part on Talk:Gusto (TV channel), regarding the merger of M3 (Canadian TV channel) to the Gusto (TV channel) article. Your input would be appreciated. musimax. (talk) 19:32, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:102.7 The Peak.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:102.7 The Peak.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:King5.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:King5.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CFVT-FM.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CFVT-FM.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Libertarian BC.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Libertarian BC.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ABC Spark Logo.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ABC Spark Logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. - Kamran Mackey (talk to me · my contributions) 23:54, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KRPI.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KRPI.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:MTV Canada logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:MTV Canada logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Emarsee. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request for input

Hey there Emarsee, as a regular contributor to helping improve Canadian TV channel articles on Wikipedia, I'd like to invite you to contribute to your input into the discussion taking part on Talk:Disney_La_Chaîne#Merger_proposal, regarding the merging of Télétoon Rétro with Disney La Chaîne. Your input would be appreciated. musimax. (talk) 20:09, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Aboriginal Peoples Television Network (logo).svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Aboriginal Peoples Television Network (logo).svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kvos.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kvos.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CISF Pulse Radio.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CISF Pulse Radio.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Discoverycc.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Discoverycc.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Discoverycc.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Discoverycc.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed

Hello Emarsee! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 22:28, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BC Liberals 2013.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BC Liberals 2013.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:07, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Omni News.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Omni News.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jrfm.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jrfm.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:39, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TVA Sports 2013.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TVA Sports 2013.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:WFNTV.svg

Thank you for uploading File:WFNTV.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Newcaptv.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Newcaptv.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:38, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Bitetv.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Bitetv.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Thecomedynetwork.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Thecomedynetwork.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Metrovancouver.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Metrovancouver.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BCGreenslogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BCGreenslogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cbcnorth.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cbcnorth.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Wildtv.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Wildtv.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:TV Fool

Template:TV Fool has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:29, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Raptorstv.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Raptorstv.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SN 360 logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SN 360 logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:58, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Good Job

BFM Lyon Ado (talk) 22:50, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Coat of arms of Vancouver.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Vancouver.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CFTV logo 2013.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CFTV logo 2013.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Ktla.svg

Thank you for uploading File:Ktla.svg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CFEGTV,png.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CFEGTV,png.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CHKG Fairchild logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CHKG Fairchild logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yeeno (talk) 18:21, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CJVB Fairchild logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CJVB Fairchild logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yeeno (talk) 18:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Global National 2013.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Global National 2013.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Global National 2013.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Global National 2013.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TSC Logo 2013.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TSC Logo 2013.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AOV XXX Action Clips.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AOV XXX Action Clips.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Much Loud.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Much Loud.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:16, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Muchvibe.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Muchvibe.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:18, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Punchmuch.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Punchmuch.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JoeTV.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JoeTV.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Qmfmlogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Qmfmlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kcts9.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kcts9.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cfrnold.PNG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cfrnold.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KPST TV..png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KPST TV..png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Tv45logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Tv45logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thefightnetwork.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thefightnetwork.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 05:17, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kcts.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kcts.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]