User:Physis/Fenevad1
Dear Fenevad,
Thank You for Your work for making the text more clear, and preserving the contents. I began to compare it to the earlier solutions.
Till now, I would suggest preserving the following linking solutions:
Old | Recent | Suggested | Motivation |
---|---|---|---|
Classically, some indigenous cultures of Siberia were described as having “shamans” | Classically, some indigenous cultures of Siberia were described as having shamans | Classically, the term was used for "shamans" of some Siberian cultures | Shamanism in Siberia formatted as "shaman' can be confusing, because there is a standalone shaman article. |
Nuliayuk at Netsiliks | Nuliayuk among the #Netsilingmiut at Netsiliks | Nuliayuk among Netsiliks | Nuliayuk among Netsiliks is one indivisible concept: the specific Sea-Woman-concept of Netsiliks (suggesting that other Eskimo groups have more or less different Sea-Woman concept). Wikilinking only Netsiliks would ber confusing, because there could be a standalone Netsikik article (although there is none yet). |
Takanaluk-arnaluk in Aua's narration | Takanaluk-arnaluk in Aua's narration | Takanaluk-arnaluk in Aua's narration | "Takanaluk-arnaluk in Aua's narration" is one concept. It cannot linked only as "Aua's narration", beacause Aua's narration is a long material, Rasmussen recordeded a lot about Aua shaman. Although maybe it could linked as "Takanaluk-arnaluk", but I would like to emphasize that it is Aua's version, not a pan-Eskimo wide concept. |
Thank You also for emphasizing the problems with the "Certain unity of Eskimo cultures" section. Really, I should like to rewrite it, emphasizing more that this is rather a certain relatedness together with diversity. I tried to write some of the motivations earlier in Talk:Shamanism among Eskimo peoples/Bidirectional approach to organize the beauty of tension between diversity versus unity of cultures.
Best wishes,
Congratulation also for learning Hungarian in two years. I learn one Eskimo language (Ungazik) since years (although not continuously) and I still have only very few knowledge. There are some similarities, e.g. possessive suffixes of the nouns, incorporating personal pronoun object into the verb, transitive vs intransitive conjugation of the verb etc.
Physis 11:52, 21 April 2007 (UTC)