Jump to content

User:Philcha/Sandbox/MOO 2 - 6

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template:Good article is only for Wikipedia:Good articles.

"MOO2" redirects here. For the chemical MoO2, see Molybdenum dioxide.
Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares
File:Moo2baa.jpg
Official North American cover

Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares (MOO2) is a 4X turn-based strategy game set in space, designed by Steve Barcia and Ken Burd, and developed by Simtex, who developed its predecessor Master of Orion. The PC version of the game was published by Microprose in 1996, while the Apple Macintosh version was published a year later by MacSoft in partnership with Microprose. The PC version is still on sale as a download, and is still played online.

Master of Orion II won the Origins Award for Best Fantasy or Science Fiction Computer Game of 1996, and was well received, although reviewers differed about which aspects they liked and disliked. It is still used as a yardstick in reviews of more recent space-based 4X games.

Victory can be gained by military or diplomatic means. Major elements of the game's strategy include the design of custom races and the need to balance the requirements for food, production, cash and research. The user interface, which is mainly mouse-based but includes keyboard shortcuts, provides a central screen for most economic management and other screens that control research, diplomacy, ship movement, combat and warship design.

Backstory

[edit]

Long before the time in which the game starts, two extremely powerful races, known as the Orions and the Antarans, fought a war that devastated most of the galaxy. The Orions won and, rather than exterminate the Antarans, imprisoned them in a "pocket dimension". The Orions then departed from the galaxy, but left behind a very powerful robotic warship, the Guardian, to protect their homeworld. [1][2] Whoever beats the Guardian gets military technologies which players cannot research for themselves; the allegiance of Loknar, the last remaining Orion, who commands a very powerful battleship; and the opportunity to colonize the Orions' homeworld, which is usually the best planet in the galaxy in all respects.[1][2]

Some time after the start of a game, the Antarans, breaking out of the prison dimension to which the Orions banished them, begin sending increasingly powerful fleets against players' colonies,[1][3] simply to destroy rather than to invade.[4] The only way to stop the Antarans' campaign of terror is to carry the battle to their home universe through a Dimensional Portal.[1]Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page).

Gameplay

[edit]

Victory conditions

[edit]

Despite the game's name, conquering the Orion star system does not automatically win the game. There are three routes to victory: conquer all opponents; be elected as the supreme leader of the galaxy; or make a successful assault against the Antaran homeworld. To be elected, a player needs two-thirds of the total votes, and each empire's votes are based on the population under its control.[1]Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page).

Stars and planets

[edit]

Star systems have at most five colonizable planets, and a few have none. Players can colonize all types of planets although gas giants and asteroids require the planet construction technology. Colonizable planets vary in several ways, making some more desirable than others:[1][5]

  • Population capacity, which on most planets can be improved by terraforming. "Toxic" planets cannot be terraformed.[1][6]
  • Ease of growing food, which is important for the reasons described below. At the start of the game most planets are incapable of supporting agriculture, but terraforming can remedy this, except on "toxic" planets.[1][6]
  • Very rare "splinter colonies", which automatically join the empire that discovers them and acquire its racial advantages and disadvantages.[1]Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page).
  • Sometimes other features that increase or decrease productivity in one or more of farming, industry, research and cashflow.[1][6]

The most desirable systems are usually guarded by space monsters, much less powerful than Orion's Guardian but still a severe challenge in the early game, when fleets are small and low-tech.[7]

How planets' economies work

[edit]

Without food, a colony will starve to death. If an empire as a whole has a food surplus, it can prevent starvation by sending food in freighters,[1]Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page). but using these costs money.[1]Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page). Just one tiny hostile warship can prevent this by blockading a whole system.[1][8]

Players can change a colony's output by moving colonists between farming, industry and research,[1][9] except that natives can only farm.[1]Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page). This economic management system came almost directly from an earlier Simtex game, Master of Magic.[10] All normal colonists pay a standard tax to the imperial treasury and in emergencies one can set a higher tax rate, but this reduces industrial output.[1]Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page). One can use surplus money to accelerate production of an item, but not to increase agricultural or research output.[1][11]

Maintaining buildings costs money and so does running an excessively large fleet.[1]Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page). Ships of different sizes require different numbers of "command points". These are provided by orbital starbases, which are major construction projects for small colonies. This severely limits the size of empires' fleets in the early game, where one can have only four frigates (smallest type of ship) or one battleship (largest type of ship in the early game) per 4 starbase without having to "buy" command points, which is very expensive.[1][12][1][13]

Research, usually followed by construction of appropriate buildings, can improve all types of productivity including cashflow and command points, and can also reduce or eliminate pollution,[1][14] which is a serious constraint on industrial output in the early game.[1][14]

The technology tree

[edit]
File:Moo2ResearchMenu472.png
Research Menu, showing the eight divisions of the tech tree, and highlighting the subject currently chosen

Falling behind in technology is likely to be fatal. There are eight research areas,[1][13][1][15] each divided into several levels, each of which contains one to four technologies. To research a higher-level technology, one must first have researched the previous level.[1][15] "Creative" races get all the technologies at a particular level by completing one research project at that level; most races must choose only one technology from each level; "uncreative" races get no choice and the game software randomly selects a technology for them at each level.[1][15] Players can also acquire technologies by trading, spying, planetary conquest, or capturing and dismantling enemy ships.[1][15]

All weapons and some other combat-related components benefit from miniaturisation, in which further advances in the technology area that provides them will reduce the size and production cost of these components.[1][16] Miniaturisation also makes available modifications for most weapons, which usually entail a significant increase in their cost and size but can greatly improve their effectiveness in the right situations.[1][16]

Diplomacy

[edit]

Master of Orion II provides a wide range of diplomatic negotiations: gifts of money or technology or even all the colonies in a star system; opportunities to demand such concessions from other players; technology trades; trade, non-aggression and alliance treaties.[1][17] The diplomacy menu, called "Races" in the game, also enables the player to allocate spies between defensive duties and spying or sabotage against other empires, and to check opponents' technological progress and diplomatic relationships.[1][18]

Spaceship design

[edit]

The designs of colony ships, outpost ships and troop transports are fixed,[1][19] although they benefit from technology advances which increase the travel range and speed of all of an empire's ships free of charge.[1][13] These three ship types will be destroyed instantly if they travel without an escort and are attacked by anything, even the weakest combat ship.[1]Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page).

Players can design warships, provided they choose the "tactical combat" option in game set-up.[1][20] One can design a maximum of 5 classes at a time, but can have an infinite number of classes in operation. One can also refit ships to take advantage of technology improvements which do not provide free upgrades.[1][20]

Combat and invasion

[edit]
File:Moo2SpaceCombat400.png
Master of Orion II's space combat screen. In this example the battleships on the left are attacking the colony on the right, which is defended by a starbase. The space combat screen shows part of a larger, scrollable map.

Ships can travel to any star system within their range,[1][21] unlike games such as Space Empires or Master of Orion III where interstellar travel is possible only or mainly via "wormholes" and it is possible to set up easily-defended choke points.[22][23] Space combat occurs only within star systems, either over a planet one side is attacking or on the outskirts of a system, if one side is driving away the other's blockaders or trying to prevent an enemy buildup. If the defending side has warships and several colonies in a system, they automatically scamble to defend whichever colony is attacked.[1][24] Limitations on the size of empires' fleets mean that most battles involve only a handful of ships on each side.[25] Ships do not form stacks as in Master of Orion,Cite error: The <ref> tag has too many names (see the help page). but move and fire individually.[1][26]

At the start of a game the user chooses whether all space combat should be "tactical" (controlled by the player) or "strategic" (controlled by the software), but choosing strategic combat prevents players from designing their own ships.[1]Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page). In tactical combat the screen has an "Auto" button which makes the software take control of the player's ships and finish the battle.[1][26]

Enemy colonies can be taken over only after all orbital and planet-based defenses have been destroyed and all defending ships have been destroyed or forced to retreat.[1][27] The only way to seize control of an enemy colony is by invading. In order to do this, the attacking fleet must include some troop transports, which will be lost if the invasion fails, and at least one will be permanently deployed on the planet if the invasion succeeds.[1][27] A player cannot control ground combat: the result depends on numbers, ground combat technologies, racial ground combat bonuses, and some Leaders (if present). However the game displays the progress of the combat and the ground combat technologies and bonuses used by each side.[1][27] Telepathic races can mind-control enemy populations, but mind-control is thwarted if the defending system belongs to a telepathic race or is governed by a telepathic leader.[1][28]

[1][29]IIn other cases the only way to seize control of an enemy colony is by invading. In order to do this, the attacking fleet must include some troop transports, which will be lost if the invasion fails, and at least one will be permanently deployed on the planet if the invasion succeeds.[1]Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page). A player cannot control ground combat: the result depends on numbers, ground combat technologies, racial ground combat bonuses, and some Leaders (if present). However the game displays the progress of the combat and the ground combat technologies and bonuses used by each side.[1][27] Recently-invaded colonies on the other hand are disaffected, have poor productivity, and may rebel and rejoin the empire which founded them. Productivity slowly improves and the risk of rebellion slowly recedes, and there is a way to speed up these improvements.[1][30] However, mind-controlled colonies are instantly loyal to their new owners.[1]Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page). Instead of invading, a victorious attacker may destroy an enemy colony by various means.[1]Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page).

Leaders

[edit]

From time to time players get opportunities to hire leaders, for an annual salary and usually a hiring fee. Colony leaders improve the farming and / or industrial and / or research and / or financial productivity of all colonies in the system to which they are assigned, and some improve the efficiency of defensive or offensive spies. Ship leaders improve the combat effectiveness of their ships and sometimes their travel speed. A few leaders of both types also improve the performance of warships and / or ground troops under their command, or contribute directly to a player's finances, or attract other leaders, usually for a reduced hiring fee.[1][31]

Random events

[edit]

From time to time there are lucky breaks, disasters or emergencies which are not caused by any player's actions. These can be disabled in the game start-up menu.[1][26]

Playable races

[edit]
File:Moo2RaceDesignMenu.png
The Race Design screen. It highlights options already chosen, and grays out those that are no longer available. The bottom shows the number of picks still available.

Master of Orion II provides 13 pre-defined playable races,[1][32] three of which are additions to those available in Master of Orion.[4] The game also allows players to create custom races,[1][26][33] and race design is regarded by players as a crucial element of strategy.[34] Each player starts with 10 "picks" (race design points). Choosing advantageous traits reduces the number of picks available, while choosing disadvantages increases them, but players cannot choose more than 10 picks' worth of disadvantages. Most of the options are major or minor advantages and minor disadvantages in farming, industry, research, population growth, money, space combat, espionage and ground combat.[1][35]

The race design system also offers "special abilities" that have various effects on various aspects of their effectiveness. The most expensive of these are:[1][35]

  • "Tolerant" races have a higher population limit on colonized planets than most other races, and their industrial productivity is not reduced by pollution.
  • "Lithovores" feed on the natural minerals of a planet, and do not need to farm.
  • "Creative" races research all the technologies at each level by completing one research project; all other races must choose one technological application to develop out of a given research project; "uncreative" races get no choice and the software randomly selects an application to be developed out of each research project undertaken. "Creative" is the third most expensive option, but the last Microprose patch increased this to 8[36]Cite error: The <ref> tag name cannot be a simple integer (see the help page).

The player chooses the empire's form of government,[33] which has almost as much influence on how it performs as the choices described above, but the "best" governments cost a lot of picks.[33] Dictatorships are the most common governments for the pre-defined races,[37] and cost no picks.[33] Democracy provides major advantages in research and money, but is the most vulnerable to spying and sabotage. Unification government provides advantages in farming, industrial production and spy defense but does not benefit from morale. Feudalism provides a large reduction in spaceship construction costs, but suffers from very slow research; the race design menu treats Feudalism as a significant disadvantage.[33] Each government can be upgraded once by research, but the upgrades generally increase the advantages of each without decreasing its disadvantages.[37]

User interface

[edit]

250px|thumb|right|The main screen: the pop-up window displays information about a specific star system, while the large window under it displays the galaxy as a whole. This is mainly mouse-driven, but some screens also have hotkeys for important functions. [1][26][38]

The main screen consists mainly of a zoomable but not scrollable map of the galaxy. Stars have names which are color-coded to show which empires have colonies round them. Clicking on a star that the player has already visited produces a pop-up window which shows the planets round that star. Clicking a fleet allows the player to give orders and displays a pop-up which shows each ship in the fleet, and dotted lines show friendly and enemy ship movements.[39] The buttons along the bottom give access to various menus,[38] and the icons on the right provide information about the status of the empire and access to additional menus.[40]

250px|thumb|left|Colony List, with sort buttons along the bottom. The cursor (hand) on the right is about to open a colony's Build Menu. Players can manage their economies almost entirely from the Colony List, which can be sorted by any of one of: Name, Population, Food production, Industrial production, Research production, the item currently being built, or Cash (BC) generated. The Colony List allows the player to access any colony's Build Menu, and to change a colony's output by moving colonists between Farmers, Workers and Scientists.[38]

The Build Menu allows the player to queue up to 7 items (buildings, ships or spies) for construction at a colony, to refit ships in that colony's system and to design ships which may then be built at any colony.[41]

At the end of each turn Master of Orion II shows a report in which items link to the appropriate display, usually to a colony's Build menu when a construction project has been completed.[38]

The Information menu gives access to: a History Graph which shows how the player's empire compares with rival empires; the racial characteristics of all empires with which the player is in contact; the technologies the player has researched; and descriptions of all technologies, including the exotic ones which the player cannot research but may gain by beating Orion's Guardian or by capturing an Antaran ship and scrapping it afterwards.[38]

Development

[edit]

The game was designed by Steve Barcia and Ken Burd,[42] and developed by Simtex, which had previously developed Master of Orion, published in 1993 by Microprose.[43] Barcia and Burd aimed to offer new challenges requested by users of Master of Orion and to provide increased replayability, by: increasing the range of decisions players had to make; offering additional pre-defined races and the option to create custom races; and including multiplayer options.[44] The first "Orion" game's graphics had also been heavily criticized, and the second included higher-quality artwork displayed at a higher resolution.[43][45]

In June 1995 Microprose agreed to buy Simtex,[46] and turned it into an internal development division.[45] This continued to be known as "Simtex Software",[44] and the Simtex logo appears briefly before Microprose's while MOO II is loading.[45] Microprose released Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares for IBM-compatible PCs in 1996,[47] and an Apple Macintosh version was published a year later by Microprose in partnership with MacSoft.[47][48]

Reception

[edit]
Summary
Aggregator Score
GameRankings 82.8%[49]
Metacritic 84%[50]
Reviews of MOO II Score
Chick "looms large"[51]
Geryk ??[52]
Mayer 3.5/5[53]
Meinfelder 3/5[54]
Solo 8.9[55]
Ward 8.7[56]
2000s Reviews Score
Other Space 4X Games
Comparation with MOO II		 Score
Galactic Civilizations II: Dread Lords 9.00 [57]
Lost Empire 6.0 [58]

Reviews shortly after publication were generally very favourable,[59] and the game won the Origins Award for Best Fantasy or Science Fiction Computer Game of 1996.[66] However reviewers' detailed comments on aspects of the game differed, especially in comparisons with its predecessor Master of Orion. Some liked the additional gameplay features in Master of Orion II, while others preferred the simpler approach of Master of Orion.[67] The level of micromanagement was criticized by some,[68] but Tom Chick found it fairly easy to control.[45] Opinions also varied about: the single-player AI,[7][45] tactical combat,[4][7][67] warship design facility,[7][67] and custom races.[4][67] There were complaints that the loading of copious artwork from the CD made the game run slowly,[43] and enthusiasts now advise players to avoid this by loading all of the files on to their hard disks.[69] A review specifically for the Mac version complained that the user interface was "clunky", as this PC port lacked features common in programs originally developed for the Mac.[70] However reviewers appreciated the replay value provided by the wide range of galaxy, race and other options.[4][43]

Chick's retrospective review described Master of Orion II and its predecessor Master of Orion as "looming large" in any discussion of space-based strategy games.[45] Master of Orion II has been used as the standard for comparison in reviews of more recent space-based 4X games such as Space Empires IV (2000), Galactic Civilizations II (2006–2009) and Lost Empire: Immortals (2008).[71]

Since 2000, revieves have looked at other games

Post-publication

[edit]

The game is still played online, and one group of enthusiasts has developed a patch for the MS-DOS version, which fixes some bugs and adds more game set-up options, and a few mods which adjust the game balance.[72] Difficulties have been reported in running the game directly under Windows XP, Windows Vista and Mac OS X, and the same enthusiasts recommend running the MS-DOS version under the control of the emulator DOSBox, which they say also offers some advantages for online multi-player games and works equally well for Linux and Mac OS users.[73]

So far there has been one sequel, Master of Orion 3. Comments by reviewers and players have mostly been unfavorable.[74] Despite the similar names, there are large differences in gameplay between Master of Orion II and Master of Orion 3.[75]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab ac ad ae af ag ah ai aj ak al am an ao ap aq ar as at au av aw ax ay az ba bb bc bd be bf Cite error: The named reference MOO II was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  2. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference iv was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  3. ^ Cite error: The named reference 8-10 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  4. ^ a b c d e Cite error: The named reference Ward1996GameSpotReview was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  5. ^ Cite error: The named reference 47-52 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  6. ^ a b c Cite error: The named reference 88,56 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  7. ^ a b c d e Mayer, R. (1997). "Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares". Strategy Plus, Inc. Archived from the original on April 18, 2004. Retrieved 2009-05-11. {{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; April 18, 2005 suggested (help)
  8. ^ Cite error: The named reference 139-140 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  9. ^ Cite error: The named reference 57-58 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  10. ^ Cite error: The named reference tealeavesMOO was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  11. ^ Cite error: The named reference 35-38 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  12. ^ Cite error: The named reference 115-116 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  13. ^ a b c Cite error: The named reference 67-100 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  14. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference 78,72 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  15. ^ a b c d Cite error: The named reference 64-65 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  16. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference 100-102 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  17. ^ Cite error: The named reference 132-143 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  18. ^ Cite error: The named reference 42-43 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  19. ^ Cite error: The named reference 105-111 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  20. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference 11,105-111 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  21. ^ Cite error: The named reference 30-31 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  22. ^ Cite error: The named reference Geryk00SpaEmpIV was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  23. ^ Cite error: The named reference TacticCancer was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  24. ^ Cite error: The named reference 118-119 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  25. ^ Cite error: The named reference Mayer was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  26. ^ a b c d e Cite error: The named reference 119-130 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  27. ^ a b c d Cite error: The named reference 130-132 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  28. ^ Cite error: The named reference 115,130-132 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  29. ^ Cite error: The named reference 114-116 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  30. ^ Cite error: The named reference 81,132 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  31. ^ Cite error: The named reference 113-117 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  32. ^ Cite error: The named reference 13-15 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  33. ^ a b c d e Cite error: The named reference ManualPCRaceDesign was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  34. ^ Cite error: The named reference CybersaberStrategyGuide was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  35. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference 16-24 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  36. ^ Cite error: The named reference MOO II ReadMe was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  37. ^ a b Cite error: The named reference ManualPCPredefRaces was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  38. ^ a b c d e |pp. 35-44
  39. ^ pp. 27-30
  40. ^ Cite error: The named reference ManualPCStatusIndicators was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  41. ^ MOO II Manual (PC), pp. 60-62
  42. ^ MOO II Manual (PC), p. 153
  43. ^ a b c d Meinfelder, E. (1997). "Rule the Galaxy for $50". InfoMedia, Inc. Retrieved 2009-05-09.
  44. ^ a b Giovetti, A. (March 13, 1997). "Master of Orion II (2): Battle at Antares". Retrieved 2009-06-08.
  45. ^ a b c d e f g Chick, T. (2001). "PC Retroview: Master of Orion II". IGN. Retrieved 2009-05-09.
  46. ^ "SEC Info - Microprose Inc/DE - 10-Q - For 6/30/98". Fran Finnegan & Company. Retrieved 2009-06-08.
  47. ^ a b "GameSpy Company Bio: Microprose". Retrieved 2009-05-09.
  48. ^ "GameSpy Company Bio: MacSoft". Retrieved 2009-05-09.
  49. ^ GameRankings.
  50. ^ Metacritic.
  51. ^ ChickMoo2Retroview2001.
  52. ^ GerykHistSpaceEmpireMOO2.
  53. ^ Mayer 1997. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFMayer1997 (help)
  54. ^ Meinfelder 1997.
  55. ^ Solo 2009.
  56. ^ Ward 1996. sfn error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFWard1996 (help)
  57. ^ GC II: Dread Lords.
  58. ^ [[#CITEREF|]].
  59. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k "Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares". Metacritic. Retrieved 2009-05-09.
  60. ^ Smith, M. "Masters of Orion 2". TotalGames. Archived from the original on May 05, 2003. Retrieved 2009-06-08. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |archivedate= (help)
  61. ^ Nguyen, D. (May 1997). "Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares". Games Domain Review. Archived from the original on June 17, 1997. Retrieved 2009-06-08.
  62. ^ Ward, T.C. (November 26, 1996). "Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares". CNET Networks. Archived from the original on July 10, 2001. Retrieved 2009-06-08.
  63. ^ Cooke, M. (May 6, 2004). "Master of Orion 2 - PC". AtomicOnline. Retrieved 2009-06-08.
  64. ^ "Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares". CBS Interactive Inc. Retrieved 2009-06-08.
  65. ^ "Master of Orion II:" Battle at Antares – MobyRank". MobyGames. 1999. Retrieved 2009-06-08.
  66. ^ Academy of Adventure Gaming "Origins Awards for 1996". Retrieved 2009-05-09. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  67. ^ a b c d Geryk, B. "History of space empire games – Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares". CBS Interactive Inc. Retrieved 2009-05-10.
  68. ^ Geryk, B. "History of space empire games – Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares". GameSpot. Retrieved 2009-05-09.
  69. ^ "Lord Brazen" (January 1, 2005). "Installing Master of Orion II v1.40 on Win XP". Retrieved 2009-05-09.
  70. ^ Corbett, C. "Master of Orion II (Mac)". Dimension Z Online. Retrieved 2009-05-11.
  71. ^ Examples:
  72. ^ "Master of Orion II Mods - An Overview". Retrieved 2009-05-09.
  73. ^ "DOSBox Guide for Online Play". Retrieved 2009-05-09.
  74. ^ Cite error: The named reference MetacriticMOO3 was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
  75. ^ Hammond, B. (January 09, 2006). "Master of Orion 3". netjak. Retrieved 2009-05-11. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Cite error: A list-defined reference named "ReadMe" is not used in the content (see the help page).

Cite error: A list-defined reference has no name (see the help page).
[edit]
  1. ^ "Cybersaber" (2005). "Master of Orion II Online: Strategy Guide". Retrieved 2009-05-11.
  2. ^ Geryk, B. (November 28. 2000). "Space Empires: IV (PC)". CBS Interactive Inc. Retrieved 2009-05-10. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. ^ Parker, S. (March 6, 2003). "Master of Orion III Review". CBS Interactive Inc. Retrieved 2009-05-10.
  4. ^ Mayer, R. (1997). "Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares". Strategy Plus, Inc. Retrieved 2009-05-11.
  5. ^ "4X: Master Of Orion". Retrieved 20 2-22. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |accessdate= (help)
  6. ^ "GalCiv2, SotS, SEV: a 4X Comparison". 16 December 2006. Retrieved 2021-02-20.
  7. ^ Ward, T.C. (November 26, 1996). "Master of Orion II: Battle at Antares Review – Gamespot". GameSpot. CBS Interactive Inc. Retrieved 2012-02-23.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Philcha/Sandbox/MOO_2_-_6&oldid=997932994"