User:Passengerpigeon/sandbox
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. (October 1965) |
The article This page has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
The following concern
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
Please do not continue to use Wikipedia as a social network, as you apparently did at Wikipedia:Teahouse. You have been warned already about using talk pages and/or help resources for general discussion, and if you continue to do so without making any significant contributions to the encyclopedia, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Passengerpigeon (talk) 02:30, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you trigger the edit filter again, as you did at Edit filter, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your attempted edits have been disallowed multiple times already because they did not appear constructive.
Passengerpigeon (talk) 03:33, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
This is the final warning you will receive regarding undisclosed paid editing. You have made numerous edits that give editors the impression that you are being paid to edit Wikipedia, and you have failed to respond to multiple warnings on your talk page. If you continue editing Wikipedia without replying on your talk page and stating whether or not you are being paid to edit, you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Paid editing without disclosure is a serious breach of Wikipedia's Terms of Use. Passengerpigeon (talk) 09:09, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
You still have not responded to the previous notice you received about paid editing. Before you make any more edits to Wikipedia pages, like you did at Draft:Spam, you must reply to my message - if editors' suspicions are incorrect, and you are not being paid to edit, you can simply say so. Please use the template {{ping|Passengerpigeon}} in your message so that I am alerted. If you are worried, understand that paid editing is allowed on Wikipedia, so long as it follows all of the usual policies and guidelines; please read the guide to conflict-of-interest editing and our paid editing policy for more information. Repeated paid editing without disclosure is a violation of our terms of use and can lead to contributors being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Passengerpigeon (talk) 09:03, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Passengerpigeon. I noticed that you recently created one or more alternative accounts using your main user account. Please note that Wikipedia has a sockpuppetry policy, which only allows the usage of alternative accounts for specific reasons; most importantly, they must never be used in a manner that leads people to believe that the two usernames represent two different people. I would appreciate it if you could reply to this comment and tell me why you decided to create your alternate account(s); if you choose to do so, please place the template {{ping|Passengerpigeon}} in your message so that I am alerted. If you have questions, you may contact me on my talk page. Thanks! Passengerpigeon (talk) 08:27, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Passengerpigeon. One or more of your recent page creations, such as Draft:Spam, give me the impression that you are receiving payment in return for editing Wikipedia, and/or work for the person or organisation that the page is about. Note that according to the Wikipedia Terms of Use, paid editors must disclose their connections. Before making any edits, please reply to this message and state whether or not you are being paid, and place the template {{ping|Passengerpigeon}} in your message so that I am alerted. If you have questions, you may contact me on my talk page. Thanks! Passengerpigeon (talk) 08:05, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Passengerpigeon. I wanted to let you know that I removed or struck out one or more of your recent comments at a deletion discussion, specifically Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Sandbox, because you didn't clearly say why you wanted the page to be kept or deleted. Please note that deletion debates are consensus-based discussions, not ballot polls, and arguments for or against deletion must be made on the basis of our policies and guidelines, such as our deletion policy and subject-specific notability guidelines. You are welcome to add your comment back into the discussion with an accompanying explanation of your position. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Passengerpigeon (talk) 04:06, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you trigger the edit filter again, as you did at Edit filter, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your attempted edits have disallowed multiple times already because they did not appear constructive.
Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Very short new article. I noticed that you recently had one or more articles tagged for speedy deletion under criteria A1 or A3, because they didn't contain substantiative content. To avoid this in the future, you might want to consider creating the article in draftspace or your userspace first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary; this will give you more time to work on your article as pages created in this manner cannot be deleted for lacking content. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Additional text goes here Passengerpigeon (talk) 03:48, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of [[:{{{1}}}]]
Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at [[:{{{1}}}]]. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by [[:{{{1}}}|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
 | This is the sandbox page for User:Passengerpigeon (diff). |
_____
,----/,--. `.
/ '. `-' \
| ____ \ '`|_
\'.--._/` _ \ '.
/'-|/ \|`\|-` \
/ / \ |
| ; '` | .'
'. |;; ; /
\ \ ; / ,'
;--, .,--,
mx__||=|=|./|=|=||___
`'-'-' `-'-'`
___________________________
/'/ / \ \ \
/ '.'; ; \ ' \
'-/ | ; | ; \-'
\_| | | |_/
`-'\_/`-'
_ _
<')_,/ <') ,/
(_==/ (_==/
jgs ='- ='-
Apparently, a block of text with a few innocuous pound symbols in it sets off the "ASCII art" filter, but a big ASCII eagle and 2 little birds don't. I may as well leave them here. Passengerpigeon (talk) 03:50, 18 August 2014 (UTC)