User:Pan Piotr Glownia

Introduction

I am Polish citizen, who lives in Sweden. I also happen to be Polish and Austrian nobleman, which doesn't mean much these days.

Hobby

My interrests are in Polish nobility, the modern Sarmatians, who descend from Slavic people's warrior class and in all activities leading to rebirth of my Sarmatian (Lechitic|Crown of Poland) Polish Overclan of Polish Nobility - the historic original Polish Nation - often refered to also as "the Polish Nobility Nation" and less often as "the Republic" and "the Sarmatia".

Overclan translated into Polish means also Nation and Polish encyclopedia states that "Overclan (pl. Narod) = Nation (pl. Nacja)". Despite all basic differences between the territorial community and the community of relatives! The second one doesn't need a country to exist just the right DNA. I guess hating Polish nationalism alike Polish stalinism is my birth's duty.

Slavic peoples' traditional ethnic partitions and VANDALISM of putting Czechs as ethnic Lechs

West Slavic peoples are not equal with West Slavic languages because all Slavic peoples used more or less the same Slavic language 1000 years ago and were already partitioned into these western, southern and eastern groups. We Slavic peoples call these ethnic partitions amongst us Slavic peoples for "Lechs" (ethnic Western Slavic peoples), "Czechs" (ethnic Southern Slavic peoples) and "Rusins" (ethnic Eastern Slavic peoples) for a good reason. Common sense tells one that if even Czechs were direct speakers of modern Polish language, then they still would be belonging to the Southern Slavic peoples by their ethnicity. Ethnic Czechs during entire written history never were ethnic Lechs. This ethnic partition is probably older then any possible differentiation of Proto-Slavic language.

The legend of Lech, Czech and Rus is a part of spoken Slavic history and from XIII century AD ("Chronicle of Greater Poland" written in year 1295) also documented in historical sources. Futhermore ethnicity does not equal language. Never did. Never will. Particularly that this is not modern XXI century ethnic partition, but traditional, which lasted for over 800 years non-stop.

Legend of Atlantis - Something maybe worth looking in about us Sarmatians (my own personal theory)

About 9000 BC Western Sarmatians (I1a Y-DNA) moved out of Spain and Northern Africa, where they spend ice age to settle Western and Northern Europe. Then we Sarmatians still looked like Half-Cromagnon Half-Sapiens. The archeologic findings puts cultural centre between 9000-4500 of this new settlement in Danmark, but the royal city of Sarmatia was founded on coast of Baltic Sea (which through all ancient times was known as Sarmatian Sea). This location is more logical, as Eastern Sarmatians (I1b Y-DNA) spend ice age to the north from Greece and Black Sea in the Eastern Europe with cultural centre 9000-4500 in Belarus. The possibility of Western Sarmatian people to be founders of oceatic kingdom spanning over entire Western and Northern Europe and Northern Magreb in Africa is possible due chronicles of Roman conquest of modern France territories, where it is suggest Celtic Venedi, who held monopoly on seatrade between continent and British islands in times of Julius Ceasar and operated purely sail boats with high decks specially adapted to operate the sailing conditions of Atlantic Ocean. Also it is known that Sarmatians did fought Greeks around years 2000BC-1000BC, as the legend of Amazons, whom were originally Sarmatian women suggest. So Sarmatians were ancient enemies of Greeks too.

About the kingdom of Sarmatia from 900BC (invasion by Kingdom of Scythia) to 500AD(unification of Eastern Europe by Hun Attilla and creation of Slavic people out of European Scythians and mostly Eastern Sarmatians). Sarmatians were brethren of Thracians (they spoke similiar language and formed by Romans sources the biggest people of ancient Europe... and imho were also historic Eastern Sarmatians in Belarus, Northern Ukraina and Southern Poland), who also fought wars with Greeks (That siege of Troy for the example), which happened around year 2000. In known ancient times Kingdom of Sarmatia was just a loose confederation of smaller kingdoms and partially populated by Scythians, which can be genetically shown by spread of Scythian's R1a Y-DNA in Northern Europe amongst I1a Y-DNA Europeans.

The Sarmatian royal city was found around or on Baltic island called Rugia near another important Sarmatian city, which was Sarmatian religious pagan centre was on island Wolin. Slavic people's tales say the city suddenly during a storm sunk under water and disapeared like never existed. Many people put this legend as something, which happened during Medieval Times and was caused by high tide during storm acting on Baltic, which out of sudden had more water then usual and certainly more water then the time the settlement was found. Now it seems to me logical that 9000 BC, when icebergs were still big and large in Scandinavia the level of Baltic Sea was low enough for such city to be found. Western Slavic people and their ancestors were known to settle sandy islands on Baltic Sea and on rivers and reinforce them with wood support so sand wouldn't drift and waters shouldn't flow over their settlements during storms for example. Also Pomeranian tribe use to be part of people called Sarmatian Venedi or as German call them, the Wends.

So 9000BC Atlantis was found. 2000BC Sarmatian kingdom fought against Athens on side of Troy, but lost. The royal tribe (it had fewer clans, but these clans were closer related then normal clans in normal Sarmatian tribes) sank together with their city 1000BC causing fall of Sarmatian Kingdom into relative anarchy. 900BC Sarmatian Kingdom was invaded by Scythian Kingdom and Celtic people revolted driving Western Sarmatians from France and Spain over to British Islands and conquering their mastern in Spain (the legend of Irish peoples' origins) and France (the Celtic Venedi peoples' origin). The only free Sarmatians were living only in Britain (Scotish/Pikts) and in Scandinavia (Hyperboreans, whom local Germanics refered to as Alves/Elfs and they were giving them until christianity the "alvabot"="the gift for the Elfs", which was part of their ritual). Elfs were consideren by Northern Germanics as half-human and half-god beings. Germanics moved into Europe was about 4500 BC and original place they settled was on river Vistula in modern Poland from where they (mostly Visigoths) were driven away by Hun Attilla), so they lived in kingdom of Sarmatia or as they would say Sarmatians living on lands of their country called Germania. But to the surviving under Scythians kingdom of Sarmatia occupied territory in Eastern Europe right to the east of Germania, which during times of Hun Attilla had its western border on river Ren in Western Germany.

I got my hint, when I was trying to understand meaning of the name of one of the three Sarmatian founding tribes of Slavic people, the Venedi, the Sklavene and the Anti. Venedi means in Slavic "plentifull" and I assume it refers to Lech-Western Slavic peoples. Sklavene means "famous" in Slavic as the Thracian Getae people were in Rome and Greece and I assume it refers to Czech-Southern Slavic peoples. Anti I assumed was refering to Rus-Eastern Slavic peoples from who one of their tribes Alans moved to Central Asia and then was big part of Hun Attilla conquest of Europe and Caucasus. Just in Slavic language "Ant" means nothing at all. So I assumed it was screwed by foreigners, as it always happens in these cases that people are using the most comfortable version of a word and Slavic words never were mercifull for Greeks, Romans or Germans languages. However it occures to me that these Anti living almost on shores of Black Sea were the most known true Sarmatians to Greeks and Romans between years 900BC-400AD (400AD Getae were conquered by Scythian Sarmatians from north of them and then I assume Sklavene Sarmatians were founded). I think it was mostly because of Greek settlements on Black Sea. So they just may be refered by ancient Romans as Antis as tribute to dwellers of Atlantis. Antlantis sounds very similiar to Atlantis and if "land" is in meaning quite clear, then the sound of "Ant/At" can be little similiar when speaking Slavic. After all we still have these confusing sounds after all even if few of them already went out usage in Slavic languages around year 1000AD.

After all as legends of Slavic people and Ancient Greeks go... these two legends about ethernal Slavic/Sarmatian great city, which sunk sudenly over one night in cold waters of Baltic and Atlantis can have something in common. At least we know that Sarmatians and Greeks knew eachother and fought against eachoter for sure on shores of Black Sea in terrains of modern Ukraine. This stuff about Sarmatians is quite knew to me, as nobody seriously in XXI century digged into roots of Slavic people, as I did using genetics and spoken Slavic and Sarmatian traditions of Poland. We Slavic people didn't appear in our millions from the wetmarks of Belarus all over the Europe and none of the scientists can prove their claims that we Slavic people or our culture ever existed outside of Europe. This stuff I know for sure, as I was looking for "proofs" of these scientifically established _hypothesises_, if not pure XIXth century scientific maniac-fantasies.