User:Orsini/Sandbox3
In order to remain listed at Wikipedia:Requests for comment, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 04:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 04:06, 13 November 2024 (UTC).
- xxxxxxxxxxxx (talk · contribs · logs)
Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.
Statement of the dispute
[edit](state here)
Desired outcome
[edit](Anynobody: Evaluation and comment on his general editing style, observance of WP:Policy, suggestions and feedback regarding how I handled his behavior by uninvolved members of the community. I really am requesting comments.)
Description
[edit]{Anynobody: The subject was friendly at first, but increasingly became hostile as he learned that my POV is not exactly aligned with his in regard to Scientology. (I'm neutral but believe it has it's good and bad points.) The first disagreement was about how WP:BLP applies to articles in a discussion on Talk:Barbara Schwarz. Next was his refusal to consider that his WP:POV might be interfering with his ability to maintain a WP:NPOV, as he was suggesting the 4h AfD for the article arguing lack of notability. The three prior AfDs had voted to keep the article for that exact reason based on the same arguments he presented. Following this was his request to delete the first WP:RFC submitted about him, an administrator whom we had consulted for advice deleted it. He has continued to act in bad faith toward those he perceives as anti-Scientology or editors who disagree with him while ignoring attempts at WP:DR.}
Evidence of disputed behavior
[edit](see instructions)
Other issues
Applicable policies and guidelines
[edit]{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}
- Policies:
- Almost total disregard for the policy of Dispute Resolution.
- No Personal Attacks both overt and passive attacks have come from this editor.
- Dispute Resolution has been unsuccessful due to subjects avoidance of RfC process
- Civility is not maintained while dealing with those who hold an opposing POV
- Neutral Point of View compromised by Religious bias
- Consensus, "Asking the other parent" related to DP violations listed next.
- Deletion Policy 2 categories:
- Guidelines:
- Assume Good Faith
- Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point
- Disruptive Editing
- Do not bite the newcomers
- Conflict of Interest
Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute
[edit]Users certifying the basis for this dispute
[edit]{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}
- Anynobody 05:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
Other users who endorse this summary
[edit]Response
[edit]This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
Users who endorse this summary:
Outside view
[edit]This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.
{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}
Users who endorse this summary:
Discussion
[edit]All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to [[Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia:Requests for comment/xxxxxxxxxx|this page's discussion page]]. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.