User:Nr2023/Lili Elbe/Bibliography

Bibliography

As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:

Is the source from a reliable publication?
- Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
- Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
Is the source verifiable?
- In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
- Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
- For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
- Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
- Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
- Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
- Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
- In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
- Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
- Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
- Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
- Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.

If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Get Help

Bibliography

This is where you will compile the bibliography for your Wikipedia assignment. Add the name and/or notes about what each source covers, then use the "Cite" button to generate the citation for that source

Vicente, M. V. (2021). The Medicalization of the Transsexual: Patient-Physician Narratives in the First Half of the Twentieth Century. Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, 76(4), 392–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/jrab037^[1]
- This is a peer reviewed scientific journal, so it should be a reliable source. It provides great detail surrounding surgeries undergone by Lili Elbe and relationship to Hirschfeld. This will help establish notability.
Gailey, N. (2017). Strange Bedfellows: Anachronisms, Identity Politics, and the Queer Case of Trans*. Journal of Homosexuality, 64(12), 1713–1730. https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2016.1265355^[2]
- This is a peer reviewed scholarly article so it should be a reliable source. It provides details about the the autobiography Man Into Woman. It helps establish notability.
Caughie, Pamela L., Emily Datskou, Sabine Meyer, Rebecca J. Parker, and Nikolaus Wasmoen, eds. Lili Elbe Digital Archive. Web. Feb 23, 2023. <http://www.lilielbe.org>.^[3]
- This digital archive is a collaborative effort from multiple scholars, it should be a reliable source. This source can help establish notability as it provides narrative of her life, the publication history all editions of the autobiography, and many archival documents (letters, books etc)
Quinowski, G. (2022). Psycho, The Danish Girl, and Disclosure: Transgender Representation in Film. Culture, Society, and Praxis, 14(1), 2.^[4]
- This is a peer reviewed source so it should be reliable. It has a few sentences demonstrating criticisms to the 2015 film, The Danish Girl.

References

^ Vicente, Marta V (2021-09-23). "The Medicalization of the Transsexual: Patient-Physician Narratives in the First Half of the Twentieth Century". Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. 76 (4): 392–416. doi:10.1093/jhmas/jrab037. ISSN 0022-5045.
^ Gailey, Nerissa (2017-10-15). "Strange Bedfellows: Anachronisms, Identity Politics, and the Queer Case of Trans*". Journal of Homosexuality. 64 (12): 1713–1730. doi:10.1080/00918369.2016.1265355. ISSN 0091-8369. PMID 27892825.
^ "Lili Elbe Digital Archive". www.lilielbe.org. Retrieved 2023-02-23.
^ Quinowski, Grace (2022-05-09). "Psycho, The Danish Girl, and Disclosure : Transgender Representation in Film". Culture, Society, and Praxis. 14 (1). ISSN 1544-3159.

^[1]

^ "Biography of Lili Elbe, Pioneering Transgender Woman". ThoughtCo. Retrieved 2023-04-03.

[1] Vicente, Marta V (2021-09-23). "The Medicalization of the Transsexual: Patient-Physician Narratives in the First Half of the Twentieth Century". Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences. 76 (4): 392–416. doi:10.1093/jhmas/jrab037. ISSN 0022-5045.

[2] Gailey, Nerissa (2017-10-15). "Strange Bedfellows: Anachronisms, Identity Politics, and the Queer Case of Trans*". Journal of Homosexuality. 64 (12): 1713–1730. doi:10.1080/00918369.2016.1265355. ISSN 0091-8369. PMID 27892825.

[3] "Lili Elbe Digital Archive". www.lilielbe.org. Retrieved 2023-02-23.

[4] Quinowski, Grace (2022-05-09). "Psycho, The Danish Girl, and Disclosure : Transgender Representation in Film". Culture, Society, and Praxis. 14 (1). ISSN 1544-3159.

[5] "Biography of Lili Elbe, Pioneering Transgender Woman". ThoughtCo. Retrieved 2023-04-03.

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[1]