User:Novil Ariandis

Hi, I am the writer of the webcomic Sandra and Woo featuring the girl Sandra and her pet raccoon Woo.
It is inspired by Bill Watterson’s outstanding comic strip Calvin and Hobbes.

Userboxes

de

Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache.

en-4

This user can contribute with a near-native level of English.

fr-1

Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau élémentaire de français.

no
ads

This user is against advertisements on Wikipedia.

This user's favourite animal is the raccoon.

This user is interested in the way of life of carnivorans.

This user is concerned about wildlife conservation.

This user is concerned about animal welfare.

Articles

I have written (important parts of) the following articles:

Bahaman raccoon: complete rewrite of the article
Barbados raccoon: complete rewrite of the article
Cozumel raccoon: partial rewrite of the article
Fake fur: partial rewrite of the article
Feline Fuelled Games: article created
Guadeloupe raccoon: complete rewrite of the article
Island raccoons (DYK): article created
List of fictional raccoons: rewrite of most parts of the article
List of webcomic awards‎: article created
Norm Feuti: partial rewrite of the article
Planescape: Torment: one of several main authors
Raccoon: complete rewrite of the article
Sandra and Woo: article created
Ulf Hohmann: article created
Tres Marias raccoon: complete rewrite of the article
William Silvers: article created

Guidelines

I like the following guidelines:

Wikipedia:Verifiability: While it sometimes might be a problem when an extensive source cannot be used for good and featured articles, because it is not considered reliable (e.g. a fan site), it is a shame that citing reliable sources for all non trivial information in an article is still not common in the German Wikipedia.

I do not like the following guidelines:

Wikipedia:Lead section: This guideline is often misinterpreted in a way that the length of the lead of many otherwise good articles is outrageous with sometimes more than five paragraphs. In my opinion it does not make sense to write down the exact same information twice.
Template:Grading_scheme: The rating system (not including good and featured articles) is completely useless and arbitrary and should therefore be abolished. That A class articles are supposed to be better than GA class articles is particularly absurd.

Other Websites