User:Natinsley
| Soybean aphid | |
|---|---|
| |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | |
| Phylum: | |
| Class: | |
| Order: | |
| Family: | |
| Subfamily: | |
| Genus: | |
| Species: | glycines
|
The soybean aphid (Aphis glycines Matsumura) is an insect pest of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) that is exotic to North America (Ragsdale et al. 2004). The soybean aphid is native to Asia (Blackman and Eastop 2000). It has been described as a common pest of soybean in China (Wang et al. 1962) and as an occasional pest of soybean in Indonesia (Iwaki 1979), Japan (Takahashi et al. 1993), Korea (Chung et al. 1980), Malaysia (Blackman and Eastop 2000), the Philippines (Quimio and Calilung 1993), and Thailand (Paik 1963). The soybean aphid was first documented in North America in Wisconsin in July 2000 (Alleman et al. 2002). Ragsdale et al. (2004) noted that the soybean aphid probably arrived in North America earlier than 2000, but remained undetected for a period of time. Venette and Ragsdale (2004) suggested that Japan probably served as the point of origin for the soybean aphid’s North American invasion. By 2003, the soybean aphid had been documented in Delaware, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, New York, North Dakota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin (Venette and Ragsdale 2004). Together, these states accounted for 89% of the 63.6 million acres (2.58 × 107 ha) of soybean planted in the United States in 2007 (NASS 2008).
Life history
[edit]The soybean aphid possesses a heteroecious holocyclic life cycle, which means the insect alternates hosts and undergoes sexual reproduction for at least part of its life cycle (Wang et al. 1962). Soybean aphids overwinter as eggs on their primary hosts, buckthorn (Rhamnus spp.) (Ragsdale et al. 2004). Eggs can be located near buds or within crevices of branches (Wang et al. 1962). With a mean supercooling point of -34°C, eggs are well-adapted for surviving cold winters (McCornack et al. 2005). In two studies, the quantity of overwintering eggs had a strong positive correlation with the severity of soybean aphid outbreaks in the following spring (Wang et al. 1962, Wu et al. 2004).
Eggs begin to hatch into fundatrices when temperatures in the spring reach 10°C (Wang et al. 1962). Colonization of buckthorn by soybean aphids in the spring can lead to curling of leaves and twigs (Wang et al. 1962). Near the blooming stage of buckthorn, fundatrices reproduce parthenogenetically to give viviparous birth to alatae (Wang et al. 1962). These winged soybean aphids begin the spring migration to their secondary host, soybean (Ragsdale et al. 2004). Soybean aphids go through approximately 15 generations on soybean, all of which are primarily composed of apterous females produced through viviparous parthenogenesis (Wang et al. 1962, Venette and Ragsdale 2004). Each generation passes through 4 instars and can range from 2 to 16 days in length, with lower temperatures increasing development and decreasing generation time (Zhang 1988, Li et al. 2000, Wu et al. 2004).
Feeding by soybean aphids injures soybean by interfering with photosynthetic pathways—more specifically, biological mechanisms responsible for restoring chlorophyll to a low energy state are impaired (Macedo et al. 2003). This restoration process is known as quenching and is important for plants to execute light reactions properly. Reduction in photosynthetic capacity of soybean may occur before plants begin to display symptoms of injury (Macedo et al. 2003).
Infestation of soybean aphids on soybean can be classified into three stages (Cheng et al. 1984). The first stage occurs when alatae migrate to soybean in late May and early June. During this stage, small colonies of soybean aphids appear patchy, occurring on single plants scattered throughout a field (Ragsdale et al. 2004). In these early colonies, soybean aphids are typically grouped on tender, young leaves of soybean plants (Shi et al. 1994). As the infested plant ages, soybean aphids remain on leaves near the top of the plant. Studies have demonstrated a positive correlation exists between upper leaf nitrogen content of soybean and the occurrence of soybean aphids (Hu et al. 1992, Wu et al. 2004). Damage to a soybean plant during this initial stage is a result of stylet-feeding and can include curling and stunting of leaves and twigs, physiological delays, and underdevelopment of root tissue (Wang et al. 1962, Hirano 1996). However, the relatively low densities of soybean aphids during this stage have been found to have minimal impacts on soybean yield (Dai and Fan 1991).
The second stage, or pre-peak stage, can begin as early as late June and is characterized by dramatic increases in densities of soybean aphids (Cheng et al. 1984). As colonies expand and temperatures increase, soybean aphids move toward lower portions of the soybean plant (Shi et al. 1994). The optimal temperature for soybean aphid development occurs between 25 and 30°C, and exposure to prolonged temperatures of 35°C decrease survival rates and fecundity of soybean aphids (McCornack et al. 2004). Extremely high population growth rates can be achieved under optimal conditions, with a colony doubling in size in as few as 1.3 days (Venette and Ragsdale 2004).
The final stage of infestation by soybean aphids on soybean, or peak stage, begins in mid- to late July and is characterized by very high densities of soybean aphids (Cheng et al. 1984). As populations grow during this stage, plant damage may become severe. Heavy infestations of soybean aphids may cause plant stunting, distorted foliage, premature defoliation, stunted stems and leaves, reduced branch, pod, and seed numbers, lower seed weight, and underdevelopment of root tissue (Wu et al. 2004). Yield losses as high as 50 to 70% have been documented as a result of prolonged exposure to high densities of soybean aphids (Wang et al. 1962, Dai and Fan 1991, Wu et al. 2004).
When populations of soybean aphids increase, a need arises for apterae to produce alate offspring to seek out new hosts. This can be due to both deteriorating host plant quality and crowding effects (Lu and Chen 1993). Crowding of nymphal apterae will not cause them to develop into alate adults (Lu and Chen 1993). Crowding effects on alatae can induce alate offspring production as well, although alatae are not as sensitive to crowding as apterae (Lu and Chen 1993). Soybean plants are prevented from becoming super-saturated by emigration of soybean aphids through alate production, which serves to maintain an equilibrium density of soybean aphids (Ito 1953). Decreased body size and lowered fecundity can be induced in soybean aphids when populations reach very high densities (Ito 1953).
As host plant quality begins to deteriorate in late August and early September, soybean aphids take on a paler color and experience decreased growth and reproductive rates (Wang et al. 1962, Ragsdale et al. 2004). High densities of soybean aphids during these late plant stages have less of a significant negative impact on soybean yield (Dai and Fan 1991). During this period of declining temperatures and decreasing rainfall, soybean plants undergo senescence gradually from bottom to top, causing an upward movement of soybean aphids to higher plant tissue (Shi et al. 1994).
After going through approximately 15 generations on soybean, soybean aphids begin to transition back to their primary host, buckthorn. A generation of winged females, gynoparae, develop on soybean and leave for buckthorn when mature (Wang et al. 1962). Simultaneously, an apterous population of soybean aphids remains on soybean to produce alate male sexual morphs (Wang et al. 1962). Factors that positively affect the production of gynoparae and male alatae include declining host plant quality, shortened day length, and lowered temperatures (Hodgson et al. 2005).
While on buckthorn, gynoparae produce a generation of apterous female sexual morphs (oviparae) that mate with male alatae to produce overwintering eggs (Wang et al. 1962). As buckthorn experiences increased feeding pressure by oviparae, volatile emissions from the plant are significantly decreased, possibly serving as a defense mechanism to inhibit further colonization by soybean aphids (Zhu et al. 2006). Male alatae locate oviparae on buckthorn through two sex pheromones commonly found in aphid species, (1R,4aS,7S,7aR)-nepetalactol and (4aS,7S,7aR)-nepetalactone, that are emitted by oviparae in a species-specific combination (Zhu et al. 2006). After mating on buckthorn, oviparae deposit their eggs on the plant. Ragsdale et al. (2004) proposed that movement from soybean to buckthorn may produce a bottleneck effect that inhibits the ability of soybean aphids to overwinter in great numbers.
Host plant biology
[edit]
More than 100 species of Rhamnus exist worldwide, and most of these species are native to temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere (Voegtlin et al. 2005). Rhamnus species are plentiful in North America (Voegtlin et al. 2005). Two confirmed Rhamnus species that support overwintering of soybean aphids in North America are common buckthorn (Rhamnus cathartica L.) of exotic origin and alderleaf buckthorn (Rhamnus alnifolia L’Hér.) of native origin (Ragsdale et al. 2004). Another widespread Rhamnus species of exotic origin in North America is alder buckthorn (Rhamnus frangula L.); however, neither mature oviparae nor eggs have been documented on this potential host (Voegtlin et al. 2004).
In an experiment to determine alternate primary hosts for soybean aphids, only members of the genus Rhamnus were able to support development of soybean aphids (Voegtlin et al. 2005). In Asia, where the soybean aphid is native, dominant primary hosts include Japanese buckthorn (Rhamnus japonica Maxim) and Dahurian buckthorn (Rhamnus davurica Pallas) (Takahashi et al. 1993). One study indicated certain plant species may play a role in bridging colonization of soybean from buckthorn (Voegtlin et al. 2005). One such species that is readily available in early spring is red clover (Trifolium pratense L.). An experiment further reinforced this relationship by demonstrating that soybean aphids can develop on red clover in a laboratory setting (Ragsdale et al. 2004).
The most common secondary host in both Asia and North America for soybean aphids is soybean (Ragsdale et al. 2004). Soybean has been cultivated in Asia for 4,000 to 5,000 years and in the United States since 1904 (Tello 1975, Wu et al. 2004). Du et al. (1994) demonstrated that the primary method by which soybean aphids locate soybean is through olfactory chemical signaling. Interference by non-host odors diminished the ability of soybean aphids to locate and colonize soybean.
Deleterious effects of soybean aphids on soybean can be highly variable and are influenced by factors like soybean aphid density, plant stage, plant density, and temperature (Dai and Fan 1991, Hirano 1996). In addition, soil nutrient conditions within a soybean field may play some role in the development of infestations of soybean aphids. For example, in a laboratory experiment, soybean aphids that fed on potassium-deficient soybean experienced increased fecundity and survivorship (Myers et al. 2005a). Field experiments failed to corroborate this finding. Myers et al. (2005a) hypothesized that potassium-stress in the laboratory may lead to increased nitrogen availability for soybean aphids. Yield data taken from this experiment showed that potassium-stress in conjunction with infestation by soybean aphids caused significant yield loss.
Specificity for soybean aphids to feed on soybean has been demonstrated by Han and Yan (1985) in an experiment utilizing an electrical penetration graph. While no difference in the amount of time spent probing between soybean and other non-host plants was observed, the ingestion of phloem by soybean aphids was either greatly reduced or did not happen at all on non-host plants (Han and Yan 1995). Nevertheless, some alternate secondary hosts have been observed for soybean aphids. The most widespread of these alternate secondary hosts is wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. and Zucc.), which has been known to support colonies of soybean aphids in Asia (Takahashi et al. 1993). In Korea and the Philippines, kudzu (Pueraria montana (Lour.) Merr.) and tropical kudzu (Pueraria javanica Benth) have been described as alternate secondary hosts, respectively (Hirano 1996).
Viral transmission
[edit]Soybean aphids may indirectly affect plant health through viral transmission. Viruses spread by soybean aphids are typically vectored non-persistently, which allows for disease transmission in the first moments of stylet penetration (Nault et al. 2004). Non-persistent transmission does not limit viruses vectored by soybean aphids to soybean, but rather to any plant that alate soybean aphids contact and probe with their stylets for a brief period of time (Domier et al. 2003). Unlike stationary apterae, only alatae have been shown to transmit viruses between plants (Chen et al. 1988). Incidence of non-persistently transmitted viruses has been shown to increase when flight activity of the vector is high, leading to the belief that the risk of virus transmission by soybean aphids may increase during times of high dispersal, such as the end of the peak stage (Nault et al. 2004).
In China, the most important virus vectored by the soybean aphid is Soybean mosaic virus, which can cause yield loss and decreased seed quality (Wu et al. 2004). This virus is also found in North America and has been demonstrated as being vectored by the soybean aphid in field studies (Wang and Ghabrial 2002). In addition to Soybean mosaic virus, the soybean aphid is capable of transmitting Soybean stunt virus, Soybean dwarf virus, Abaca mosaic virus, Alfalfa mosaic virus, Beet mosaic virus, Tobacco vein-banding virus, Tobacco ringspot virus, Bean yellow mosaic virus, Mungbean mosaic virus, Peanut mottle virus, Peanut stripe poty virus, and Peanut mosaic virus (Clark and Perry 2002, Wu et al. 2004).
Host plant resistance
[edit]Several varieties of soybean have demonstrated resistance to the soybean aphid. Resistance may be conferred by antibiosis, antixenosis, or tolerance. In some instances, such as with the soybean cultivars Dowling, Jackson, and Palmetto, resistance to the soybean aphid results from a combination of both antibiosis and antixenosis (Diaz-Montano et al. 2006). In Dowling, resistance is conferred by a single dominant gene (Rag1) (Diaz-Montano et al. 2006). Soybean plants that are resistant to the soybean aphid can cause both reduced fecundity and longevity in soybean aphids (Li et al. 2004). In the case of antibiosis, certain life stages of the soybean aphid may be more susceptible than others. For example, nymphs have higher rates of metabolism than other life stages, ingest more phloem, and are thus exposed to larger quantities of antibiotic compounds (Li et al. 2004). Expression of antibiotic factors in resistant soybean plants that negatively affect soybean aphids has been shown to remain constant throughout the growing season, remaining unaffected by the physiological maturity of the plant (Li et al. 2004). Colonization of resistant soybean cultivars can vary between years depending upon the level of infestation, with resistant plants showing lower levels of resistance in years with significant levels of soybean aphid infestation (Fan 1988). Physical characteristics of soybean, such as dense pubescence, have thus far proven incapable of reducing colonization by soybean aphids (Hill et al. 2004).
Natural enemies
[edit]
In Asia, the soybean aphid experiences pressure from over 30 species of predators, 8 species of parasitoids, and some fungal pathogens (Rutledge et al. 2004). In Indonesia, where the soybean aphid is considered an occasional pest, evidence indicates the use of insecticides to control soybean aphids may not always be necessary due to suppression of the insect to subeconomic densities by natural enemies alone (Heimpel et al. 2004). In North America, the dominant natural enemies in soybean are generalist predators (Fox et al. 2004). Exclusion cage experiments have provided evidence that predators can play an important role in suppression of the soybean aphid (Fox et al. 2004). Impacts from predators include both the ability to suppress colony establishment early in the season as well as respond to increased densities of soybean aphids late in the season (Fox et al. 2004).
One of the most important predators of soybean aphids in North America is the insidious flower bug (Orius insidiosus (Say)). The insidious flower bug has its greatest impact on early to mid-season populations of soybean aphids and is often able to keep soybean aphid densities low (Oku and Kobayashi 1966, Rutledge and O’Neil 2005). Fox et al. (2004) hypothesized that the impact from this predator early in the season could be attributed to small plant size and sparse canopies, which aid the insidious flower bug by reducing foraging time and decreasing the number of places soybean aphids can hide (i.e., enemy-free space). In addition, synomones released by soybean after being colonized by soybean aphids may aid the insidious flower bug in host location (Desneux et al. 2006). When populations of soybean aphids reach very high densities, top-down pressure exerted by the insidious flower bug may fail to suppress colony growth of soybean aphids (Rutledge and O’Neil 2005).
Another group of predators that plays a key role in suppression of populations of soybean aphids in North America is lady beetles (Coccinellidae spp.) (Han 1997). Some prevalent species in soybean include the twospotted lady beetle (Adalia bipunctata L.), the sevenspotted lady beetle (Coccinella septempunctata L.), the spotted lady beetle (Coleomegilla maculata De Geer), the polished lady beetle (Cycloneda munda (Say)), the multicolored Asian lady beetle (Harmonia axyridis (Pallas)), the convergent lady beetle (Hippodamia convergens Guérin-Méneville), and the thirteen spotted lady beetle (Hippodamia tredecimpunctata L.) (Dai and Zu 1997, Han 1997, Rutledge et al. 2004).
Evidence suggests that populations of lady beetles can respond to increases in populations of soybean aphids in soybean (Van Den Berg et al. 1997). In addition, increases in populations of lady beetles have the ability to inhibit colony growth of soybean aphids throughout the growing season (Han 1997). As generalist predators, lady beetles are able to feed on alternate prey when soybean aphids are at low densities (Rutledge et al. 2004). Other characteristics of lady beetles that are advantageous in times of soybean aphid scarcity include developmental delays of certain life stages, decreased body weights, and reduced clutch sizes (Rutledge et al. 2004). One of the most competitive lady beetles in North America, the multicolored Asian lady beetle, is of exotic origin. When soybean aphids are plentiful, an adult multicolored Asian lady beetle has the capacity to consume 160 soybean aphids per day (Yuan et al. 1994).
Other foliar-foraging predators that are present North American soybean fields that may play a role in suppression of soybean aphid populations include green lacewings (Chrysoperla spp.), brown lacewings (Hemerobius spp.), damsel bugs (Nabis spp.), big eyed bugs (Geocoris spp.), spined soldier bugs (Podisus maculiventris (Say)), hover flies (Syrphidae spp.), and the aphid midge (Aphidoletes aphidimyza (Rondani)) (Han 1997, Fox et al. 2004, Rutledge et al. 2004). Another group of predators that are present in soybean fields is ground beetles (Carabidae spp.); however, field experiments have shown limited to no impact from these predators on populations of soybean aphids due to the fact that ground beetles rarely scale soybean plants for prey (Fox et al. 2005). While parasitoids of the soybean aphid have a large impact on colonies in Asia—Lysiphlebia japonica (Ashmead) can have a soybean aphid parasitism rate as high as 52.6% in China—parasitoids are thought to exert only minimal pressure on soybean aphids in North America (Gao 1994, Rutledge et al. 2004).
Management
[edit]The use of insecticides to control populations of soybean aphids in soybean is the most effective management tactic in North America (Myers et al. 2005b). Insecticides available to soybean producers for controlling soybean aphids include both foliar-applied treatments and seed-applied treatments (Wu et al. 2004, Hammond 2006, Echtenkamp 2007). Although seed-applied treatments have proven to be a convenient delivery method for insect control, studies have experienced inconsistent results regarding their efficacy against the soybean aphid (Steffey 2007). Management decisions should be made with an understanding of soybean aphid life history and sound scouting practices rooted in the principles of integrated pest management (Myers et al. 2005b, Ragsdale et al. 2007).
The current economic threshold for soybean aphids states that an insecticide application is warranted when soybean aphid densities reach 250 soybean aphids per plant, 80% of sampled plants are infested, the population is currently increasing, and few natural enemies are observed in the field (Ragsdale et al. 2007). This recommendation is only valid from the R1 (beginning bloom) to R5 (beginning seed) growth stages and is based on an economic injury level of 674 soybean aphids per plant. Due to the clumped spatial distribution of soybean aphids, Onstad et al. (2005) recommend that 50 plants should be sampled within a field to attain an accurate representation of densities of soybean aphids. Soybean producers can choose from a variety of foliar insecticides from the carbamate, pyrethroid, and organophosphate chemical families to control soybean aphids (Kim et al. 1987, Myers et al. 2005b).
Evidence indicates that foliar insecticide applications can reduce symptoms associated with soybean aphid infestations, including curled leaves, shortened stems, stunted plants, and premature defoliation (Wang et al. 1994). Foliar insecticide applications can also prevent yield loss associated with high densities of soybean aphids (Wang et al. 1996, Huang et al. 1998). However, some risks are associated with the use of foliar insecticide applications, especially if integrated pest management principles are abandoned. A single, well-timed application may not sufficiently control soybean aphids and prevent yield loss, especially if large quantities of soybean aphids are surviving on lower leaves (Myers et al. 2005b). Foliar insecticide applications can work detrimentally if nontarget effects are experienced, such as the unintended death of beneficial natural enemies (Dai and Zu 1997).
References cited
[edit]Alleman, R. J., C. R. Grau, and D. B. Hogg. 2002. Soybean aphid host range and virus transmission efficiency. In Proc. Wisconsin fertilizer aglime pest management conf. University of Wisconsin Extension, Madison, Wisconsin.
Blackman, R. L., and V. F. Eastop. 2000. Aphids on the world’s crops: an identification and information guide, 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, New York.
Bosque-Pérez, N. A., J. B. Johnson, D. J. Schotzko, and L. Unger. 2002. Species diversity, abundance, and phenology of aphid natural enemies on spring wheats resistant and susceptible to Russian wheat aphid. Biocontrol 47: 667–684.
Chen, Y. X., B. D. Xiu, F. R. Zhang, and H. Wu. 1988. Aphid flight activity and epidemiology of Soybean mosaic virus in the spring planted soybean fields. J. Nanjing Agr. Univ. 11: 60–64.
Cheng, R. L., S. Y. Wang, X. Z. Bao, E. P. Xu, and W. M. Xie. 1984. Prediction of soybean aphid using overwintering eggs. J. Jilin Agr. Sci. 34: 56–61.
Chung, K. H., S. H. Kwon, and Y. I. Lee. 1980. Studies on the density of soybean aphids in different cultivars, planting date and spacings. Korean J. Crop Sci. 25: 35–40.
Clark, A. J., and K. L. Perry. 2002. Transmissibility of field isolates of soybean viruses by Aphis glycines. Plant Dis. 86: 1219–1222.
Dai, M. X., and A. M. Zu. 1997. Toxicity of G-P compound bioinsecticide to aphids and their natural enemies in soybean fields. Nat. Enem. Ins. 19: 145–151.
Dai, Z. L., and J. Fan. 1991. Effects of aphid population dynamics and damage period on soybean yield. J. Shenyang Agr. Univ. 22: 135–139.
Desneux, N., R. J. O’Neil, and H. J. S. Yoo. 2006. Suppression of population growth of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, by predators: the identification of a key predator and the effects of prey dispersion, predator abundance, and temperature. Environ. Entomol. 35: 1342–1349.
Diaz-Montano, J., J. C. Reese, W. T. Schapaugh, and L. R. Campbell. 2006. Characterization of antibiosis and antixenosis to the soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) in several soybean genotypes. J. Econ. Entomol. 99: 1884–1889.
Domier, L. L., I. J. Latorre, T. A. Steinlage, N. McCoppin, and G. L. Hartman. 2003. Variability and transmission by Aphis glycines of North American and Asian Soybean mosaic virus isolates. Arch. Virol. 148: 1925–1941.
Du, Y. J., F. S. Yan, X. L. Han, and G. X. Zhang. 1994. Olfaction in host plant selection of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines. Acta Entomol. Sinica 37: 385–392.
Echtenkamp, G. W. 2007. Control of soybean aphids in soybeans, 2006. Arthropod Management Tests 32: F48.
Fan, Y. H. 1988. Screening for soybean varieties resistant to soybean aphid. Soybean Sci. 7: 167–169.
Fox, T. B., D. A. Landis, F. F. Cardoso, and C. D. DiFonzo. 2004. Predators suppress Aphis glycines Matsumura population growth in soybean. Environ. Entomol. 33: 608–618.
Fox, T. B., D. A. Landis, F. F. Cardoso, and C. D. DiFonzo. 2005. Impact of predation on establishment of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines, in soybean, Glycine max. Biocontrol 50: 545–563.
Fuentes-Contreras, E., and H. M. Niemeyer. 2000. Effect of wheat resistance, the parasitoid Aphidius rhopalosiphi, and the entomopathogenic fungus Pandora neoaphidis, on population dynamics of the cereal aphid Sitobion avenae. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 97: 109–114.
Gao, J. F. 1994. Biological characteristics and control effect of Lysiphlebia japonica (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) on Aphis glycines (Homoptera: Aphididae). Chin. J. Biol. Control 10: 91–92.
Gassmann, A. J., and J. D. Hare. 2005. Indirect cost of a defensive trait: variation in trichome type affects the natural enemies of herbivorous insects on Datura wrightii. Oecologia 144: 62–71.
Gauld, I. D., and K. J. Gaston. 1994. The taste of enemy-free space: parasitoids and nasty hosts, pp. 279–299. In B. A. Hawkins and W. Sheehan (eds.), Parasitoid community ecology. Oxford University Press, New York, New York.
Gould, F., G. G. Kennedy, and M. T. Johnson. 1991. Effects of natural enemies on the rate of herbivore adaptation to resistant host plants. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 58: 1–14.
Groot, A. T., and M. Dicke. 2002. Insect-resistant transgenic plants in a multi-trophic context. Plant J. 31: 387–406.
Hammond, R. B. 2006. Seed treatments in soybean, 2005. Arthropod Management Tests 31: F36.
Han, X. C. 1997. Population dynamics of soybean aphid (Aphis glycines) and its natural enemies in fields. Hubei Agr. Sci. 2: 22–24.
Han, X. L., and F. S. Yan. 1995. Stylet penetration behavior of soybean aphid, Aphis glycines, on host and non-host plants. Acta Entomol. Sinica 38: 278–283.
Heimpel, G. E., D. W. Ragsdale, R. C. Venette, K. R. Hopper, R. J. O’Neil, C. E. Rutledge, and Z. Wu. 2004. Prospects for importation biological control of the soybean aphid: anticipating potential costs and benefits. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97: 249–258.
Hill, C. B., Y. Li, and G. L. Hartman. 2004. Resistance of Glycine species and various cultivated legumes to the soybean aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 97: 1071–1077.
Hirano, K. 1996. Ecological characteristics and causes of the occurrence of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines. Jpn. Plant Prot. Assoc. 50: 17–21.
Hodgson, E. W., R. C. Venette, M. Abrahamson, and D. W. Ragsdale. 2005. Alate production of soybean aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) in Minnesota. Environ. Entomol. 34: 1456–1463.
Hu, Q., W. Q. Zhang, Y. X. Yao, and S. Q. Yan. 1992. The relationship between the quantity of nitrogen in soybean leaves and occurrence of Aphis glycines Matsumura. J. Jilin Agr. Univ. 14: 103–104.
Huang, C. D., J. F. Zhou, and D. Yang. 1998. Experiments on the control of soybean aphid by imidacloprid. Pesticides 37: 44–45.
Ito, Y. 1953. Studies on the population increase and movements of soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura. Oyo-Kontyu 8: 141–148.
Iwaki, M. 1979. Virus and mycoplasma diseases of leguminous crops in Indonesia. Rev. Plant Prot. Res. 12: 88–97.
Kim, G. H., W. K. Shim, J. W. Ahn, and K. Y. Cho. 1987. Susceptibility of several insecticides on three aphids. Korean J. Plant Prot. 26: 83–88.
Li, C. S., R. W. Luo, C. L. Yang, Y. F. Shang, J. H. Zhao, and X. Q. Xin. 2000. Studies on the biology and control of Aphis glycines. Soybean Sci. 19: 337–340.
Li, Y., C. B. Hill, and G. L. Hartman. 2004. Effects of three resistant soybean genotypes on the fecundity, mortality, and maturation of soybean aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 97: 1106–1111.
Lu, L. H., and R. L. Chen. 1993. Study on the production of alatae in the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines. Acta Entomol. Sinica 36: 143–149.
Macedo, T. B., C. S. Bastos, L. G. Higley, K. R. Ostlie, and S. Madhavan. 2003. Photosynthetic responses of soybean to soybean aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) injury. J. Econ. Entomol. 96: 188–193.
Maxwell, F. G. 1972. Host plant resistance to insects—nutritional and pest management relationships, pp. 599–609. In J. G. Rodriguez (ed.), Insect and mite nutrition: significance and implications in ecology and pest management. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
McCornack, B. P., D. W. Ragsdale, and R. C. Venette. 2004. Demography of soybean aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) at summer temperatures. J. Econ. Entomol. 97: 854–861.
McCornack, B. P., M. A. Carrillo, R. C. Venette, and D. W. Ragsdale. 2005. Physiological constraints on the overwintering potential of the soybean aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae). Environ. Entomol. 34: 235–240.
Messina, F. J., and S. M. Sorenson. 2001. Effectiveness of lacewing larvae in reducing Russian wheat aphid populations on susceptible and resistant wheat. Biol. Control 21: 19–26.
Myers, S. W., C. Gratton, R. P. Wolkowski, D. B. Hogg, and J. L. Wedberg. 2005a. Effects of soil potassium availability on soybean aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae) population dynamics and soybean yield. J. Econ. Entomol. 98: 113–120.
Myers, S. W., D. B. Hogg, and J. L. Wedberg. 2005b. Determining the optimal timing of foliar insecticide applications for control of soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on soybean. J. Econ. Entomol. 98: 2006–2012.
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2008. Crop production 2007 summary. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, District of Columbia.
Nault, B. A., D. A. Shah, H. R. Dillard, and A. C. McFaul. 2004. Seasonal and spatial dynamics of alate aphid dispersal in snap bean fields in proximity to alfalfa and implications for virus management. Environ. Entomol. 33: 1593–1601.
Ode, P. J. 2006. Plant chemistry and natural enemy fitness: effects on herbivore and natural enemy interactions. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51: 163–185.
Oku, T., and T. Kobayashi. 1966. Influence of the predation of Orius spp. (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) on the aphid population in a soybean field: an example of interrelation between a polyphagous predator and its principal preys. Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Z. 10: 89–94.
Onstad, D. W., S. Fang, D. J. Voegtlin, and M. G. Just. 2005. Sampling Aphis glycines (Homoptera: Aphididae) in soybean fields in Illinois. Environ. Entomol. 34: 170–177.
Paik, W. H. 1963. Aphids of Korea. Publishing Center of Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea.
Quimio, G. M., and V. J. Calilung. 1993. Survey of flying viruliferous aphid species and population build up of Aphis glycines Matsumura in soybean fields. Phillipp. Entomol. 9: 52–100.
Ragsdale, D. W., D. J. Voegtlin, and R. J. O’Neil. 2004. Soybean aphid biology in North America. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97: 204–208.
Ragsdale, D. W., B. P. McCornack, R. C. Venette, B. D. Potter, I. V. MacRae, E. W. Hodgson, M. E. O’Neal, K. D. Johnson, R. J. O’Neil, C. D. DiFonzo, T. E. Hunt, P. A. Glogoza, and E. M. Cullen. 2007. Economic threshold for soybean aphid (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J. Econ. Entomol. 100: 1258–1267.
Rogers, D. J., and M. J. Sullivan. 1986. Nymphal performance of Geocoris punctipes (Hemiptera: Lygaeidae) on pest-resistant soybeans. Environ. Entomol. 15: 1032–1036.
Rutledge, C. E., and R. J. O’Neil. 2005. Orius insidiosus (Say) as a predator of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura. Biol. Control 33: 56–64.
Rutledge, C. E., R. J. O’Neil, T. B. Fox, and D. A. Landis. 2004. Soybean aphid predators and their use in integrated pest management. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97: 240–248.
Shi, S. S., B. R. Yi, D. S. Li, and Y. J. Yu. 1994. Study on space dynamics of natural population of Aphis glycines Matsumura. J. Jilin Agr. Univ. 16: 75–79.
Steffey, K. S. 2007. Preparing for soybean aphids in 2007, pp. 30–35. In Proc. corn and soybean classic. University of Illinois Extension, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois.
Takahashi, S., M. Inaizumi, and K. Kawakami. 1993. Life cycle of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, in Japan. Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Z. 37: 207–212.
Tello, F. 1975. Manufacturing and marketing of soy products for human consumption in Mexico. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 52: 242–243.
Van Den Berg, H., D. Ankasah, A. Muhammad, R. Rusli, H. A. Widayanto, H. B. Wirasto, and I. Yully. 1997. Evaluating the role of predation in population fluctuations of the soybean aphid Aphis glycines in farmers’ fields in Indonesia. J. Appl. Ecol. 34: 971–984.
Venette, R. C., and D. W. Ragsdale. 2004. Assessing the invasion by soybean aphid (Homoptera: Aphididae): where will it end? Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97: 219–226.
Voegtlin, D. J., S. E. Halbert, and G. Qiao. 2004. Tests of suitability of overwintering hosts of Aphis glycines: Identification of a new host association with Rhamnus alnifolia L’Héritier. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97: 233–234.
Voegtlin, D. J., R. J. O’Neil, W. R. Graves, D. Lagos, and H. J. S. Yoo. 2005. Potential winter hosts of soybean aphid. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 98: 690–693.
Wang, C. L., L. Y. Xiang, G. X. Zhang, and H. F. Zhu. 1962. Studies on the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura. Acta Entomol. Sinica 11: 31–44.
Wang, R. Y., and S. A. Ghabrial. 2002. Effect of aphid behavior on efficiency of transmission of Soybean mosaic virus by the soybean-colonizing aphid, Aphis glycines. Plant Dis. 86: 1260–1264.
Wang, S. Y., Y. J. Sun, R. L. Chen, B. P. Zhai, and X. Z. Bao. 1994. Damage and control of soybean aphid. Technol. Promotion Plant Prot. 2: 5–6.
Wang, S. Y., X. Z. Bao, Y. J. Sun, R. L. Chen, and B. P. Zhai. 1996. Study on the effects of the population dynamics of soybean aphid (Aphis glycines) on both growth and yield of soybean. Soybean Sci. 15: 243–247.
Wu, Z., D. Schenk-Hamlin, W. Zhan, D. W. Ragsdale, and G. E. Heimpel. 2004. The soybean aphid in China: a historical review. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 97: 209–218.
Yuan, R. C., M. Yu, and G. Z. Wen. 1994. Study on the control of soybean aphid by Harmonia axyridis. Jilin Agr. Sci. 44: 30–32. Zhang, X. R. 1988. Study on the instars of soybean aphid (Aphis glycines Matsumura) in Jilin province. J. Jilin Agr. Univ. 44: 30–32.
Zhu, J., A. Zhang, K. Park, T. Baker, B. Lang, R. Jurenka, J. J. Obrycki, W. R. Graves, J. A. Pickett, D. Smiley, K. R. Chauhan, and J. A. Klun. 2006. Sex pheromone of the soybean aphid, Aphis glycines Matsumura, and its potential use in semiochemical-based control. Environ. Entomol. 35: 249–257.
External links
[edit]- Soybean Aphid at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Soybean Aphid at Iowa State University