User:Natefoulk4/Density functional theory/Nduc5420 Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing?
- Natefoulk4
- Link to draft you're reviewing: Density functional theory
Lead
[edit]Lead evaluation
[edit]Overall, the lead for this article is very good. It touches on the basics of the most important parts of DFT, including why it's important. However, a number of the sentences are run-on or poorly organized. This would be an easy area to work on. Another possible improvement would be to include citations to the claims made in the lead. There is a lot of good stuff, but citing papers or textbooks would help adhere to Wikipedia's policies.
Content
[edit]Content evaluation
[edit]Very good overall. The article touches on everything you may need to know getting started with DFT. I might suggest beefing up the "Software" section at the very bottom by adding the names of specific software packages (with citations, of course).
Tone and Balance
[edit]Tone and balance evaluation
[edit]The tone is fine, but it could be more accessible to the novice.
Sources and References
[edit]Sources and references evaluation
[edit]There are a lot of places that are missing references.
Organization
[edit]Organization evaluation
[edit]The outline and flow are well done. Can't think of anything to improve there.
Images and Media
[edit]Images and media evaluation
[edit]A lot of the concepts in DFT are abstract, but there are good figures that could help make it more accessible. For example, maybe you could add some figures of the most important conceptual components, like electron density, or the exchange-correlation interactions.
Overall impressions
[edit]Overall evaluation
[edit]Great overall. Could be made even better by improving wording, refining sentence structure, adding figures, and making it more accessible to novices.