User:NK560/Asian Americans in California/NatasaEleftheriou Peer Review
Peer review
[edit]This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.
General info
[edit]- Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username)
- User:NK560
- Link to draft you're reviewing:
Lead
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
- Yes, I would suggest adding a section to your lead that shows how you added people to the article.
- Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
- Yes, I feel like you might be able to clarify it more
- Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
- yes
- Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
- it gives an overall view so no i believe it is fine
- Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
- it is not overly detailed
Content
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added relevant to the topic?
- Yes it is
- Is the content added up-to-date?
- Yes
- Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
- Nothing missing, keep adding people and maybe add section or 2 that talks about the people overall and grouping them
Tone and Balance
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added neutral?
- yes
- Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
- no
- Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
- not that i found
- Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?
- no
Sources and References
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
- yes, just cite them and you are good to go:)
- Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
- Just add them and you are good!
- Are the sources current?
- they could be updated in the resource section
- Check a few links. Do they work?
- resource #2 link doesn't work
Organization
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
- Yes and yes, just add your section
- Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
- not that i found
- Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?
- Yes, it is pretty well organized, just add some paragraphs and pictures and I think you should be ready to go!
Images and Media
[edit]Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media
- Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
- It needs more images
- Are images well-captioned?
- it has no images
- Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
- there are none so yes, just be careful when adding photos that they are ok to use
- Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?
- n/a
Overall impressions
[edit]Guiding questions:
- Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
- Yes it has, Just keep working and I think you have already put in a ton of work so good job!
- What are the strengths of the content added?
- You added a really notable list of people and its very long and its wonderful
- How can the content added be improved?
- Just what you were saying with photos and maybe a section or two, photos are a really great way to update and make an article better so I would try to focus on that!