User:Morton devonshire/IlluminatiNoticeboard
Intro
This is a noticeboard for conspiracy theory-oriented Afds. The articles suggested for review are listed because they:
- Are Non-notable (i.e. lack sufficient mention in the reputable media)
- Are Vanispamcruftisement (i.e. created on WP to promote notability for their author or movement)
- Violate undue weight, WP:NPOV, WP:NOR or WP:V
- Are so inherently flawed that they are incapble of being brought up to Wikipedia standards.
Everyone (even F.A.A. For Anarchists) is welcome to visit and watchlist this page, whether you're in favor or against these Afds -- no secret password needed. You're also free to add entries, so long as you remain civil. I've had many friends over the years who were polar politcal opposites, and yet remain good friends because we disagree and poke fun at one another's points of view, but never allow ourselves to get too serious, or too personal -- I hope that you will do the same. Keep in mind, however, that this is not a Wikiproject -- it's my userspace and noticeboard, and I reserve the right to edit all comments. The Wiki Project is over at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Conspiracy theories. There aren't any hard and fast criteria here, but one: be cool . When you add or comment on an Afd, please sign your comments. Cheers. MortonDevonshire Yo · 21:34, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Current Afds
- placeholder
Discussions of Interest
- placeholder
Stiver's Page of Things to Delete
- Striver/WikiProject 9/11 Truth Movement/Assessment
- Rhobite's similar list at User:Rhobite/9/11 watchlist
For your consideration
- The War on Freedom
- Day of Deceit
- The Creature from Jekyll Island
- Without Precedent
- The Party's Over: Oil, War, and the Fate of Industrial Societies -- no mentions in the reputable media
- The May Day Mystery
- TACMAR
- And yes, I do like the Dead Kennedys -- that's the way they spell it. We're talking about a rock band, not actual dead Kennedy family members Grandpa. MortonDevonshire Yo · 20:02, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Phenomenen Project
9/11 Conspiracy Theory Phenomena Project
Apologies
Apologies to my friend GabrielF and his wonderful but now defunct noticeboard. Never defeated, never deleted, and although hated, it doesn't violate any rules. Hat's off to you. And to all of you who might consider a similar campaign against this userpage -- lighten up, and don't take this Wikipedia enterprise too seriously! Or just start your own subuserpage, like the one over at Wikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studies/Notice board, Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board, Wikipedia:Iranian Wikipedians' notice board, Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Islam, User:Black_Falcon#Articles_nominated_for_deletion and User:EVula/AfDs -- it's a free country. Enjoy. MortonDevonshire Yo · 21:27, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
Intended Audience
This page is Super-Double-Secret Crypto Delta Chi Rosicrucian, and should mostly go unnoticed by members of the Narcolized Bohemian Gentlemen Promoting Wild Speculation.
Propaganda Efforts by 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists to Slant Wikipedia
- In case you are wondering whether there's an off-Wiki organized effort by 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists to slant Wikipedia towards their point of view, take a look at this page, where it provides instructions on how to insert 9/11 CT propaganda into Wikipedia articles.
- Here's one Truther's Call to Action against those who would seek to suppress "numerouse truthfull information"(sic), and the full string here.
Gibbering Idiots
- "Loose Change", the wacko movie available on youtube which makes claims that the events of 9/11 were an inside job, is likely to be available either on DVD or in theaters even...super rich Mark Cuban may finance the project and Charlie Sheen is apparently also going to be participating. Read all about it...
- The UK Guardian calls the Truthers "gibbering idiots".
- Classic proof that these folks have lost it completely. Zionists, Rockefeller, Jesuits, . . . I'll have to talk to George Noory about all of this.
NIST Answers it All
If you ever wonder whether experts have addressed the "controlled demolition hypothesis", go wander over to the NIST site to see the 'hypothesis' and its sad progeny completely destroyed.
External links to Prisonplanet.com
I'll post this here for now. Morton or someone else can move it somewhere better if he wants to. Prisonplanet.com is not a reliable source for anything except what its operator thinks. No article should cite them for any matter of fact. It cannot be used to support controversial material about any living person, except maybe Alex Jones, and even then only as a primary source. An external link to the site might be useful as a primary source or in articles about conspiracy theories, subject to other policies about linking, undue weight, etc. Except in these rare cases, links to prisonplanet.com should be removed. Material cited to there should be cited instead to a reliable source, or removed. Controversial material about living people cited to prisonplanet.com has to be removed until a reliable source is provided. See external links to prisonplanet.com. While many of these are from talk pages and archives, there are over 300 of them. I suspect this is a reflection of the enthusiasm of the site's fans. Tom Harrison Talk 16:40, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
- Or their stupidity...take your pick!--MONGO 20:38, 28 July 2007 (UTC)