User:Meodipt/2007 talk archive
MDPV
[edit]Great edits on MDPV, I am glad to see someone with formal education editing these articles. I try to clean them up but my organic chemistry is still fairly sketchy. 3 more years of formal education for my BSc to go. Foolishben 21:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
[edit]I see you created an article on azaperone; do you know perhaps, of what neuroleptic potency (i.e., what chlorpomazine equivalency) it is? I would tend to presume it to be rather a highly potent (>10?) neuroleptic/antipsychotic, since it's a butyrophenone, but couldn't find any data on this. Thank you.--Spiperon 06:48, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Drugs from TiHKAL template
[edit]Good work with that template and the articles you made from TiHKAL. Also sorry it took me so long to respond... these days i can rarely get to a computer. Use the force (Talk * Contribs) 22:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
Moving articles
[edit]I just wanted to let you know that it's better to use the move function, rather than cutting and pasting an article to a new title (see Help:Moving a page). This keeps the article history together. I think I have put things for CFT the way that they should be - I ended up moving the article twice because I didn't get it right the first time. Can you please double check me? Thanks for all your contributions. --Ed (Edgar181) 11:40, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Hi there
[edit]Just a quick note of thanks for your recent edits. Keep up the good work, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:28, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
J (psychedelic)
[edit]Thanks again on your work clarifying the sources for J after my last edit. Alvis 10:03, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
ohmefentanyl pharmacology namespace
[edit]A while back you made the ohmefentanyl page much more encyclopedic - my props on cleaning it up! However, you replaced one section with a link to nuklear's userpage on ohmefentanyl. I am concerned about whether encyclopedic content really belongs in the user namespace (see Wikipedia:User_page#Copies_of_other_pages), especially since the casual browser is not informed of the crossover between regulated and (mostly) unregulated content. I think a section on ohmefentanyl pharmacology within the article itself would be a much better solution than linking to nuklear's page - especially since his doesn't currently have anything to do with the mess you were cleaning up. I'll work on it (although I'm totally unfamiliar with the relevant literature and pretty busy at the moment), but I would really appreciate your help if you've got the time and are so inclined. Thanks! St3vo 17:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
(Nor)pethidine page(s)
[edit]Thanks for finally making one. I cleaned up the pethidine page a while ago and intended to start a norpethidine page at some point whenever I got the time. In the process, I did manage to upload an image of the metabolic pathways of pethidine in man (available at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Metabolism_of_pethidine.png; I can't figure out how to link to an image page instead of an image itself, forigve the inconvenience) before getting sidetracked with other business. You may find it useful. I've seen you've also cleaned up a lot of other accreted pharmacological gunk that collects on wikipedia as well. It's good to see another honest-to-god pharmacologist/medicinal chemist/practitioner of one of the allied specialties in the biological sciences.
And, re: pethidine — know how to get that confusing tag off the top? I'd do it myself but it seems kind of unseemly since I wrote what most of confused someone enough to get that tag up there. If you could give it a once-over for clarity (and maybe delete the "confusing" bit if it doesn't violate some arcane wikipedian dictate), it'd be appreciated. Porkchopmcmoose 09:05, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Invention dates
[edit]Please don't just search for the first instance of a drugs generic name in a scientific database and report that as it's invention date. Often you will not find the original article as it hasn't been named yet (obviously). KarlHallon 20:58, 8 November 2007 (UTC)