User:MaxPont/Sandbox
My own editing scribbles:
Scientific Communism and Scientific socialism is the claim by Marxists and the political leadership in the former Soviet Union that
SA March 2009: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Statement_by_SirFozzie
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Ban#Editing_on_behalf_of_banned_users
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Cold_fusion/Evidence
HPV: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/fulltext/120087700/PDFSTART?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
ARB COM: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Cold_fusion/Evidence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_arbitration/Homeopathy/Evidence
D vit: http://www.reuters.com/article/domesticNews/idUSTRE49C5SR20081013?sp=true
SA disruptions:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AGK/Archive/41#SA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AGK/Archive/42#mentoring_ScienceApologist
Fyslee DirtyHarry: [9]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Homeopathy/Evidence
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/66.67.40.76
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard
Israel lobby:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents/Wikilobby_campaign
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Homeopathy/Warning
Don't Game the system: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GAME
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#QuackGuru
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/QuackGuru
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Red_Link_Recovery
WP:ECITE
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:ECITE
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_search_engines
(ordering of headings)
See also
Notes
References
Further reading
External links
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_writing_better_articles#Standard_appendices
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_writing_better_articles
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:TC#Specific_issues
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_layout
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_style_guidelines
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:AN/I
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion#Current_discussions
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Scientific_peer_review
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Theories_of_history
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_controversial_issues
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_topics_related_to_public_relations_and_propaganda
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:External_links/workshop
http://www.albany.edu/~scifraud/bibliography.htm
http://www.rccm.org.uk/default.aspx?m=0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Quackpotwatch/Archive1
http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_4545.cfm
A half-century of neurotransmitter research: impact on neurology and psychiatry. Nobel lecture.
http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/medicine/laureates/2000/carlsson-lecture.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Levine2112/archive3#MaxPont
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Levine2112/archive3#MaxPont
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/IncidentArchive249#User:Ronz
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Ronz/notes
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/04/wikipedia_secret_mailing/
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/06/the_cult_of_wikipedia/
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/03/11/2216227
http://wikipediareview.com/index.php?showtopic=5346
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/mar/08/media.comment
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/mar/27/wikipedia.scandal