User:Marcd30319/Archive 2014

Disambiguation link notification for January 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited USS Triton (SSRN-586), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presidential Unit Citation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to USS Triton (SSRN-586) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

to produce 34,000 shaft horsepower, with a surfaced speed of {{convert|27|kn|mph km/h|abbr=on}}) and a submerged speed of {{convert|23|kn|mph km/h|abbr=on}}.<ref name=Friedman95/> ''Triton''
The_University_of_Texas_Marine_Science_Institute|The University of Texas Marine Science Institute]]] | date= 5 April 2010 | accessdate=2014-01-04}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:09, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Lone Survivor (film) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

office totals were "far more than expected and the best showing of any post-9/11 war film."<ref>{{cite web|title=Box Office: 'Lone Survivor' Victorious With $38.5 Million Debut |url=http://www.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:05, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Carrier Strike Group One may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

its maintenance on 3 February 2013 and began carrier qualifications with [[Carrier Air Wing 17]] {''pictured'').<ref>{{cite web | author= MCS 3/c Heather Roe | title= ''Carl Vinson'' Completes PIA | url= http://

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:21, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Port Visit Schedule for CSG2 Units

Hello, I was hoping you could tell me where you are getting the current port visit schedule for CSG2 units? How far in advance is this information being released? Thank you! Jwachee (talk) 18:11, 7 March 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwachee (talk • contribs) 18:08, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Task Forces 60 and 71

Hi Marc, you've done an amazing level of work on these draft article, but not mainspaced them. What's your plan? If you are not actually planning to mainspace them for a while, would you mind if I created a small seed article for TF 71 from your data, ahead of you mainspacing the entire thing? Kind regards Buckshot06 (talk) 20:21, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Buckshot06. Hope your Summer down-under has been kinder than our Winter up-top. I had a contract job that took me away from working on the TF-71 and TF-60 articles. Also, what really prevented me from completing the TF-71 article was additional research about the Pueblo and EC-121 incidents because there are a lot of excellent secondary sources that I wanted to use. Ditto the KAL 007 salvage operation. That said, please go ahead and launch the seed article at your discretion. You might not want to use the WW2 table because I want to recheck my figures -- it's a tedious process going through Blair's appendices from Silent Victory. About TF-60, the more I have done, the more I feel that much of the material can be re-purpose to the related articles mentioned in the TF-60 article draft. So I have been thinking about re-drafting the TF-60 article at a higher level, and doing more detailed fixes with those related articles. In any case, let me work on that myself. Have fun with TF-71 and elsewhere!Marcd30319 (talk) 20:54, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Our summer has been fantastic!! I may do something with TF 71. Feel free to rewrite my TF 60 seed article at your discretion; it was just that it's a really important task force, both today and in history, so I thought it would be a good idea to have some short article temporarily. That's why I did the seed article. On another note, your copies of U.S. Fleet 1993 and 1997, are they softcopy or hardcopy? Cannot get them here you see. Cheers Buckshot06 (talk) 17:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carrier Strike Group Two, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muscat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Commander, Strike Force Training Pacific may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Category:Military units and formations disestablished in 2014]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:51, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Knights Grand Cross of the Order of Orange-Nassau.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Knights Grand Cross of the Order of Orange-Nassau.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 06:54, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2014 military intervention against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant

added a link pointing to Operation Inherent Resolve

Carrier Strike Group Two

added a link pointing to Operation Inherent Resolve

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carrier Strike Group Two, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Villefranche. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mobile Landing Platform, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NASSCO. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)