User:MacTire02/kishtey geinnee
After acquiring Egrisi via a dynastic union in the 780s[citation needed] [[1]][1] Abkhazia became the dominant power in the region.[citation needed] Kingdom of Abkhazia/Egrisi, also known as Kingdom of Egrisi or the Kingdom of the Abkhazs, was established.[2] The Georgian language, which had been secondary language, replaced the Greek as a primery language.[citation needed]The kingdom flourished[3] between 850 and 950[citation needed] when it liberated significant parts of Eastern Georgia including Tbilisi from Arabian Rule.[citation needed] A period of unrest and chaos caused by conflict betwean major powers in Georgia (Kakhetia Abkhazia and Meskhetia) ended as Abkhazia and other eastern Georgian states were unified into a single Georgian monarchy under King Bagrat III (who himself was buried in the Monastery of Bedia in the Tkvarcheli district of Abkhazia[citation needed]) in the end of the 10th, and the beginning of 11th centuries.[citation needed] In the 16th century, North Caucasian ( related to Adigean) tribes started to migrate to Abkhazia[citation needed] most probably[4] due lack of land and constant conflicts in the North Caucasus.[citation needed] Georgia weakened from Mongolian invaisions was valuable for such migrations into Abkhazia.[citation needed][5] This was also escalated by geographical changes and to the mountain slide[6] in Abkhazia that for sometime almost complitely isolated the land from Georgia.[citation needed] North-West Caucasian tribes, who are referred to as Jikks in Georgian sources[citation needed] (foreign sources use the general term of "Abazs"[citation needed]), settled in Abkhazia.[citation needed] The indigenous population of Abkhazia could not duly "assimilate" to the new comers, from a social and religious point of view.[citation needed] The mass of resettled migrants replaced the local population, which resulted in a radical change of ethnic composition in this area.[1][citation needed][7] Georgians called this new ethnic group "Abkhaz", according to their place of residence,[citation needed] whilst Abkhaz kept on calling themselves "Apsuas".[citation needed] Identification of ethnonyms "Apsua" and "Abkhaz" caused chaos and confusion for researchers of the history of Abkhazia.[citation needed][citation needed] It's worth mentioning, that the self-name of the Abkhaz "Apsua" is a phonetic variation of the ethnonym "Abaza".[citation needed] It is recognized[8] in linguistics that the Abkhaz (Apsua) language together with the Abaz language form a linguistic entity,[citation needed][9] and there is only a dialectical difference between the two languages.[citation needed]
References
[edit]- ^ Beradze, T., Topuria, K., Khorava, B. "A Historical-Geographic Review of Modern Abkhazia" (pdf). p. 20. Retrieved 2010-11-04.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Commentary
[edit]Text in bold above indicates poor spelling.
Notes
[edit][1] In the reference provided there is no mention of the 780s at all, therefore it is impossible to tell whether or not this is mentioned within the reference. Please find another reference and/or find for the readers where in the reference the 780s is mentioned.
[2] Reference this please, also what's the point being made? Established by whom? When? Where? How? Why? Also, did Abkhazia become the dominant power in the region before or after it became a kingdom? As it is currently written it looks like it became a kingdom after it became a power, while not necessarily retaining its position as a power after it had become a kingdom.
[3] Flourished? How so? Did it flourish in the arts, economy, politics, ...? Please clarify.
[4] Most probably sounds like conjecture, otherwise known on this project as original research - something which is not permitted on this project. The words most probably are also known as weasel words. As there is no reference provided for this it is impossible to tell whether this is OR, use of WEASEL, or actually mentioned by an author elsewhere.
[5] This sentence makes no sense at all. What are you trying to say here? It sounds like 1. Georgia was grateful to the Mongolians, 2. Georgia was grateful to the Abkhaz, 3. the invasions facilitated the influx of Abkhaz, 4. Some other meaning. Please clarify, as as it stands it is incomprehensible.
[6] Mountain slide? What does this mean? It sounds like a themed fun park!
[7] Although this statement is referenced, it will take more than one source, unfortunately, for such a bold claim. If it is indeed true, then such an even will be referenced elsewhere and should be easy to find.
[8] It is recognized - by whom? Again this is the use of weasel words. Please clarify who does the recognizing, when they do it, by many?
[9] I don't see what this has to do with anything. Russian and Slovene also comprise a linguistic entity - that of the Slavic languages. Portuguese and Hindi also comprise a linguistic entity - the Indo-European language family. Linguistic unity or entities does not necessarily imply they are one and the same. Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian are one linguistic entity and they don't exactly get along now do they? What is the point you are trying to make? It seems you are trying to place undue emphasis on a theory that the Abkhaz are foreigners to that area. If so, remember you must balance it up to show the other side too.