Jump to content

User:MBK004/Sandbox/MILHIST

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A-Class Medal Eligibility Tracking

[edit]


Content Review Medal Tracking

[edit]

Fourth Quarter 2008

[edit]
  1. Joe N (renamed from Borg Sphere): 31 reviews
  2. JonCatalan: 25 reviews
  3. Skinny87: 16 reviews
  4. The_ed17: 14 reviews
  5. YellowMonkey: 13 reviews
  6. Abraham, B.S.: 12 reviews
  7. Cam: 11 reviews
  8. Woody: 11 reviews
  9. Roger Davies: 10 reviews
  10. Redmarkviolinist: 8 reviews
  11. Jim Sweeney: 8 reviews
  12. Nick-D: 8 reviews
  13. Brad101: 6 reviews
  14. Hawkeye7: 6 reviews
  15. Lazulilasher: 5 reviews
  16. Cla68: 5 reviews
  17. Jackyd101: 4 reviews
  18. Parsecboy: 4 reviews
  19. TomStar81: 4 reviews
  20. Ian Rose: 4 reviews
  21. Eurocopter: 3 reviews
  22. Dhatfield: 3 review
  23. MBK004: 3 reviews
  24. Bellhalla: 2 reviews
  25. Saberwyn: 2 reviews
  26. Nudve: 2 reviews
  27. Kirill Lokshin: 2 reviews
  28. Shimgray: 2 review
  29. David Fuchs: 2 reviews
  30. Banime: 1 review
  31. Gnangarra: 1 review
  32. One last pharoh: 1 review
  33. Geoff Plourde: 1 review
  34. Wandalstouring: 1 review
  35. Hohum: 1 review
  36. MisterBee1966: 1 review
  37. The Land: 1 review
  38. Ed!: 1 review
  39. Kevin Myers: 1 review
  40. AGK: 1 review
  41. djwilms: 1 review
  42. LordAmeth: 1 review
  43. Pohick2: 1 review
  44. PalestineRemembered: 1 review
  45. Narson: 1 review
  46. Guyinblack25: 1 review
  47. Kresock: 1 review
  48. Bedford: 1 review
  49. Dziban303: 1 review
  50. Maralia: 1 review
  51. Benea: 1 review
  52. Nigel Ish: 1 review
  53. Ryan4314: 1 review

First Quarter 2009

[edit]
  1. Joe N: 55 reviews
  2. The_ed17: 49 reviews
  3. Cla68: 38 reviews
  4. TomStar81: 37 reviews
  5. Nick-D: 34 reviews
  6. Abraham, B.S.: 24 reviews
  7. Wandalstouring: 23 reviews
  8. YellowMonkey: 17 reviews
  9. Cam: 13 reviews
  10. Ian Rose: 13 reviews
  11. Woody: 13 reviews
  12. JonCatalán: 10 reviews
  13. Skinny87: 9 reviews
  14. Bellhalla: 8 reviews
  15. Jim Sweeney: 7 reviews
  16. Jackyd101: 6 reviews
  17. Patar knight: 6 reviews
  18. Hawkeye7: 6 reviews
  19. EyeSerene: 4 reviews
  20. Harlsbottom: 4 reviews
  21. MBK004: 4 reviews
  22. Piotrus: 3 reviews
  23. The Land: 4 reviews
  24. Binksternet: 3 reviews
  25. GraemeLeggett: 3 reviews
  26. IceUnshattered: 3 reviews
  27. Lazulilasher: 3 reviews
  28. Parsecboy: 3 reviews
  29. Eurocopter: 2 reviews
  30. Hal Jespersen: 2 reviews
  31. Lawrencema: 2 reviews
  32. MisterBee1966: 2 reviews
  33. Nudve: 2 reviews
  34. Patton123: 2 reviews
  35. Tpbradbury: 2 reviews
  36. AdjustShift: 1 review
  37. Amore Mio: 1 review
  38. AshLin: 1 review
  39. Bachcell: 1 review
  40. Buckshot06: 1 review
  41. Ceedjee: 1 review
  42. Cool3: 1 review
  43. Dapi89: 1 review
  44. EnigmaMcmxc: 1 review
  45. Fnlayson: 1 review
  46. Giordaano: 1 review
  47. John Smith's: 1 review
  48. Kevin Myers: 1 review
  49. Kyriakos: 1 review
  50. LinguistAtLarge: 1 review
  51. Maralia: 1 review
  52. Mjroots: 1 review
  53. Nigel Ish: 1 review
  54. NuclearWarfare: 1 review
  55. Perseus71: 1 review
  56. Piotr Mikołajski: 1 review
  57. Randomran: 1 review
  58. Redmarkviolinist: 1 review
  59. Saberwyn: 1 review
  60. Stepshep: 1 review
  61. Shimgray: 1 review
  62. Sniperz11: 1 review
  63. Tartarus: 1 review
  64. Una Smith: 1 review

Second Quarter 2009

[edit]
  1. The ed17: 38 reviews
  2. Joe N: 38 reviews
  3. YellowMonkey: 24 reviews
  4. Cla68: 22 reviews
  5. Jim Sweeney: 22 reviews
  6. AustralianRupert: 21 reviews
  7. Nick-D: 19 reviews
  8. TomStar81: 19 reviews
  9. Abraham, B.S.: 15 reviews
  10. Ian Rose: 12 reviews
  11. Patar knight: 9 reviews
  12. Piotrus: 7 reviews
  13. Patton123: 6 reviews
  14. Sturmvogel 66: 6 reviews
  15. Bellhalla: 5 reviews
  16. Skinny87: 5 reviews
  17. Ed!: 4 reviews
  18. Magicpiano: 4 reviews
  19. Maralia: 4 reviews
  20. Wandalstouring: 4 reviews
  21. Cool3: 3 reviews
  22. Hawkeye7: 3 reviews
  23. IceUnshattered: 3 reviews
  24. Jackyd101: 3 reviews
  25. MBK004: 3 reviews
  26. Vantine84: 3 reviews
  27. Brad101: 2 reviews
  28. Dhatfield: 2 reviews
  29. Kirill Lokshin: 2 reviews
  30. Kirk: 2 reviews
  31. Mm40: 2 reviews
  32. Saberwyn: 2 reviews
  33. Admiral Norton: 1 review
  34. Askari Mark: 1 review
  35. Benea: 1 review
  36. Binksternet: 1 review
  37. Brianboulton: 1 review
  38. Btphelps: 1 review
  39. Cam: 1 review
  40. Cuprum17: 1 review
  41. EnigmaMcmxc: 1 review
  42. Guyinblack25: 1 review
  43. Geoff Plourde: 1 review
  44. Hartfelt: 1 review
  45. HLGallon: 1 review
  46. Juliancolton: 1 review
  47. Kyriakos: 1 review
  48. La Pianista: 1 review
  49. Nosedown: 1 review
  50. Ost316: 1 review
  51. Parsecboy: 1 review
  52. Redtigerxyz: 1 review
  53. Rosiestep: 1 review
  54. Ruhrfisch: 1 review
  55. Simon Harley: 1 review
  56. Socrates2008: 1 review
  57. Sumanch: 1 review
  58. TechOutsider: 1 review
  59. Xatsmann: 1 review

Coordinators Election Expanded Answer

[edit]

Q: Surely it would be better to abolish GA grade, which seems to overlap aspects of A and B, wastes effort in assessing an additional grade without a clear distinction from the others and which does not really help the progression from B to A, and use that effort instead to identify the better 10% of articles currently languishing on 'start'?

  • Like Jackyd101, I agree that this is a loaded question designed to encourage me to speak out against the GA process. I don't see GA as a useless or wasted effort. Your points about the overlay are spot on because of how the process is structured. Let's examine the article assessment grades from B to FA:
    • B - An assessment made by an individual representing a WikiProject
    • GA - An assessment made after a review by an individual representing the Community
    • A - An assessment made after a review by at least three individuals representing a WikiProject
    • FA - An assessment made after a review by at least three individuals representing the Community
      • Also, the standards and criteria for each increase as you go up the ladder from B - GA - A - FA
  • Seeking to abolish the GA process is a non-starter because it is so entrenched in the community and is also the first community-level of an article's quality (and the only one before FA). Also, just getting rid of GA within MILHIST would in all likelihood drive editors away when they see articles that they have put effort into bringing to GA being demoted to B. That type of alienation is completely avoidable and unacceptable. While GA has been under-utilized within MILHIST in favor of our A-Class system, GA is making a comeback within the project because it does provide an additional review step which can and usually does make the transition from B to A easier just like an A-Class Review can make the transition from GA or B to FA easier and requires less work at FAC (SandyGeorgia, the deputy FAC director has said this herself).
    • I can demonstrate this with an article: USS Texas (BB-35) is one of my pet projects along with TomStar81. When I started, Tom had expanded it and referenced it to B-Class. I initiated a GA review because I thought the article met the criteria but wasn't so sure about A-Class yet. We received a phenomenal GA review which we passed after making only a few changes. Then due to real-life events and time constraints, we let the article stay at that quality level without major changes until we initiated an A-Class Review, which also passed with only a need for minor tweaks to the article. I believe that without that GA review, the ACR would have been much more difficult and because of the ACR we have identified some items that we need to address before we attempt an FAC. To me this is the ideal way of how the system should work.
  • As to using the effort to instead identify the 10% of articles that are better than Start but languish there, if the template-driven C-Class was used, that would be done automatically with only a few minutes of template work by one or two editors.
  • Finally, I'd like to direct your attention to some statistics that were recently compiled in response to some project-wide discussions about A-Class. I think those statistics do speak for themselves in regards to the usability of the different levels of higher assessments (B, GA, A, FA).
    • Thank you for your question, and I apologize for the length, but I feel that such an in-depth answer is necessary. -MBK004 21:06, 12 March 2009 (UTC)