User:Lumal

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because it has been identified as an account used for promotion of a company or group, with a username that implies that this has been done by that company or group. See Wikipedia:Business' FAQ and Wikipedia:Conflict of interest.

This kind of activity is considered spamming and is forbidden by Wikipedia policies. In addition, the use of a username like yours violates our username policy.

You may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} on your user talk page or emailing the administrator who blocked you.

Your reason should include your response to this issue and a new username you wish to adopt that does not violate our username policy (specifically, understand that accounts are for individuals, not companies or groups, and that your username should reflect this). Usernames that have already been taken are listed here.

[1]http://lumal.com was started in early 96 and posted a lot of previously unknown databases as html. As such altavista.dec.com spidered it completely and as a result all the major search motors sample all related linkns to it with very high rankings.

Of all the systems that enjoy special treatment in search procedes this is by far the most troublesome. The IT model on which it is based is truely elegant. The editorial workforce and the committee that rules this seems to me to be built on mob rules. Craigslist is run by a dictator who seems to be lead by a moral standard and isn't trieing to cash in. I know the WIKI has a noble ideal. I wonder who's ruling the judges. Beggars can't be choosers but really who is feeding the fire. If the spark is left to flounder perhaps friendster.com getting it's butt kicked by myspace is a good model to look at. This public forum is subjective and in spite of that these editors, judges or nazis wish it is opinion. I tag and render constantly. I promote ideas & companies as entities. I generate interviews and research living individuals as historical testament. If U folks don't want to make this more democratic & perhaps "user friendly" U relegate yourself to a very anal , very narrow POV.

I spent the majority of this nite updating a wide range of items. Once again I test the WIKI herein.

Let's see what sticks..File:LumalWWII.gif

[[2]]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lumal

OK I'm starting to understand the Do's & Don't of this system

the nameSAKE of Lu & Mal 1953

March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Patrick Swayze. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SWik78 (talk) 15:13, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

people who express support who actually know him John G. Barrett unconstructive edits how interesting Lumal (talk) 10:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

John G. Barrett asked me to express his support too bad this guy edits "appeared to constitute vandalism"

see MY edits / additions http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Lumal