User:Longcake Higad/What Wikipedholizes?
This is an essay on Wikipedholism and civility. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
What factors could have possibly Wikipedholized a user? Is it the complex whole of Wikimarkup that dresses up a user to a socially useful geek thing, the simplistic opportunity to master knowledge and backing these with verifiable facts, or just anything to improve one's writing skills in a neutral point of view?
Perhaps in the comfort of the Internet and laptop/cellphone, one finds a portal to dwell in wearing only the blanket of anonymity—a fresh start contrasting the already-tainted self in front of the family or others—a canvas to repaint, redo in faceless civilian clothes. Although Wikipedia alone is a complex site with articles-long standards and rules, off-wiki life is much more than that.
A new Wikipedian could easily explain themselves, while a toddler might say their name only if asked; while good faith contributions are counted, a single mistake in real life could force an employee to be fired or for a grade-schooler to be spanked. An introvert might find themselves socializing much more online while being terribly awkward in dealing with colleagues offline. Despite the potential dangers of the Internet, nonetheless this mathematical-woven system is limitless with various gadgets; many of which are free of charge.
The irony—it allows us painting over our "faces"–past worries about grime stains or canvas tears. Userpages could have an overflowing rainbow of pixels from overusing userboxes, something that might be too expensive, if we would talk about scrapbooking and obtaining quality craft materials and/or enrolling in art classes. Maybe users would rather spend their time in the Wikiworld because editing has become an outlet; an opportunity otherwise unseen in the real world just like what some gamers might have. Like RPGs, Wikipedia users have roles; though unlike joystick-controlled plotlines, it is very unlikely to cheat in the website which is built on transparency and again, assuming good faith. After all, everyone would have wanted to prove themselves useful, even beneath the cloak of aliases which comprises chunks of the actual user.