I can name 139 countries (excluding São Tomé and Príncipe, Nauru, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Palau, Kiribati, Grenada, Comoros, Vanuatu, etc.) in 15 minutes. I would like to give the people of those countries an apology.
The Five Horsemen of Ching Chong
As a Vietnamese person, I'm proud to have the privilege of saying: annamite, banana, buddhahead, cindo, chankoro, Charlie, chigga, chinaman, Chindo, ching chang chong, ching chong, chink, chinky, chonky, cina, cokin, coolie, dink, gook, gook-eye, gooky, guizi, kaew, laowai, mite, pancake face, pancake, pastel de flango, slant, slant–eye, slope, slopehead, slopy, slopey, sloper, ting tong , yellow, yuon, zip, and zipperhead.
Wanna know a secret? lol1VNIO is not very reliable as a recent changes patroller. Sometimes, he just says "fuck it" and skips an edit and move on to the next because its summary is too long to read! He even skips pages with a long string of consecutive edits made by one user, thinking "eeh, they probably know what they're doing. Someone else will notice if there's disruption." Such unreliableness!
Frequently[Sometimes] thought of but never asked questions
No. I always respect the elders; without the Chinese language, there would be no Vietnamese, and without France, there would be no easy-to-read alphabet in Vietnam.
Do you think Wikipedia is a reliable source?
In general, no: anyone can edit and stuff get changed very quickly all the time, which includes additions of unsourced content and pov-pushes. One exception can of course be made for genre changes in music infoboxes, as its definition is very vague and differs from person to person, not to mention WP:INFOBOXCITE. This makes it the least reliable content on the entire website. Article titles are the most reliable sources in my opinion because they're difficult to change and also get logged.
You don't like the "anyone can edit" practice?
I'm radically neutral on this but leaning support. I do anti-vandal stuff is a reason for my opposing view. For the supporting view, imagine a world in which no human being can freely share in the sum of all knowledge: we wouldn't have um... forget it, every page that comes to mind is protected.this.
Have you come to realize that your responses in the second half of this FAQ are very short, almost as if you have given up the effort to reply and, instead, resorted to your attempt at verbosing the questions to look like a 🤓 but ultimately fail miserably and end up making a fool of yourself?
