User:Liz/Whiteboard
{{done}} creates Done
{{ESp|pd}} creates Partly done:
{{ESp|n}} creates Not done:
{{ESp|?}} creates Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed.
{{ESp|q}} creates Question:
{{outdent}} creates a carry-over line to begin discussion at far left.
{{Reflist-talk|closed}}
Done creates Yes Done
Partly done: creates Partly done:
Not done: creates Not done:
Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed. creates Not done: please be more specific about what needs to be changed.
Question: creates Question:
creates a carry-over line to begin discussion at far left.
References
White/Gray/Grey/Black colors | ||
White | FF FF FF | 255 255 255 |
Snow | FF FA FA | 255 250 250 |
Honeydew | F0 FF F0 | 240 255 240 |
MintCream | F5 FF FA | 245 255 250 |
Azure | F0 FF FF | 240 255 255 |
AliceBlue | F0 F8 FF | 240 248 255 |
GhostWhite | F8 F8 FF | 248 248 255 |
WhiteSmoke | F5 F5 F5 | 245 245 245 |
Seashell | FF F5 EE | 255 245 238 |
Beige | F5 F5 DC | 245 245 220 |
OldLace | FD F5 E6 | 253 245 230 |
FloralWhite | FF FA F0 | 255 250 240 |
Ivory | FF FF F0 | 255 255 240 |
AntiqueWhite | FA EB D7 | 250 235 215 |
Linen | FA F0 E6 | 250 240 230 |
LavenderBlush | FF F0 F5 | 255 240 245 |
MistyRose | FF E4 E1 | 255 228 225 |
Gainsboro | DC DC DC | 220 220 220 |
LightGray | D3 D3 D3 | 211 211 211 |
LightGrey | D3 D3 D3 | 211 211 211 |
Silver | C0 C0 C0 | 192 192 192 |
DarkGray | A9 A9 A9 | 169 169 169 |
DarkGrey | A9 A9 A9 | 169 169 169 |
Gray | 80 80 80 | 128 128 128 |
Grey | 80 80 80 | 128 128 128 |
DimGray | 69 69 69 | 105 105 105 |
DimGrey | 69 69 69 | 105 105 105 |
LightSlateGray | 77 88 99 | 119 136 153 |
LightSlateGrey | 77 88 99 | 119 136 153 |
SlateGray | 70 80 90 | 112 128 144 |
SlateGrey | 70 80 90 | 112 128 144 |
DarkSlateGray | 2F 4F 4F | 47 79 79 |
DarkSlateGrey | 2F 4F 4F | 47 79 79 |
Black | 00 00 00 | 0 0 0 |
Hello, I'm Liz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ARTICLE, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:44, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add or change content, as you did to ARTICLE, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 23:44, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices. Liz Read! Talk! 23:45, 24 August 2013 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia from Username! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and becoming a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my User Talk Page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
Here is a list of useful links that I have compiled:
- Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons
- Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view
- Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point
- Wikipedia:Attribution
- Wikipedia:Verifiability
- Wikipedia:Assume good faith
- Wikipedia:Civility
- Wikipedia:Words to avoid
- Wikipedia:Requests for oversight
- Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection
- Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment
- Special:Log/block
- Wikipedia:Requests for mediation
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
- Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR
- Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion
- Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion
- Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser
- Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention
- Wikipedia:Avoid the word "vandal"
- Wikipedia:No legal threats
- Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal
Again, welcome
Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS, such as the one you made to ARTICLE. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (NUMBER) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on MY TALK PAGE, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on this page. Again, welcome!
July 2012
[edit]Your addition to ARTICLE has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Plot section copied word-for-word from official website:
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
December 2012
[edit]Your addition to ARTICLE has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Hello, I'm USERNAME. I noticed that you recently made an edit to ARTICLE that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on MY TALK PAGE. Thanks, Tbhotch.
February 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm USERNAME. I noticed that you made a change to an article, ARTICLE, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on MY TALK PAGE. Thank you.
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to ARTICLE with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.
March 2013
[edit]Your addition to ARTICLE has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
Recent edits to ARTICLE
[edit]Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you!
June 2013
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at ARTICLE. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
July 2013
[edit]Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at ARTICLE. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing.
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at ARTICLE, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
August 2013
[edit]Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.
Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you.
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, USERNAME, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for YOUR CONTRIBUTIONS. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as ARTICLE, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
WP Resources
[edit]18 November 2024 |
- Secure site login
- #wikipedia
- #mediawiki
- #wikimedia-commons
- #wikipedia-en-vandalism
- WikiEN-l
- Wikipedia:WP
- Wikipedia:Special pages
- Special:Listadmins
- Special:Newpages
- Special:Newimages
- Special:Blockip
- Special:Log/Upload
- Special:Log/Move
- Special:Log/Delete
- Special:Log/Protect
- Special:Log/Block
- Special:Log/Newusers
- Special:Log/Renameuser
- Special:Log/Rights
- Category:Candidates for speedy deletion
- Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Policy consensus/Conclusions
- Wikipedia:Deletion guidelines for administrators
- Wikipedia:Deletion process
- Wikipedia:Infobox templates
- Wikipedia:Template messages
- Wikipedia:Template messages/General
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Disputes
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Image namespace
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Links
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Sources of articles
- Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace
- Wikipedia:Template messages/Stubs
- Wikipedia:WikiProject
- Wikipedia:WikiProject User scripts/Scripts
- Wikipedia:Tools/Editing tools
- WP:AN | Administrators' noticeboard
- WP:AER | Admin enforcement requested
- WP:AUM | Avoid using meta-templates
- WP:RFP | Requests for page protection
- WP:VIP | Vandalism in progress
- WP:3RR | Three revert rule
- WP:BB | Be bold in updating pages
- WP:BRP | Boilerplate request for permission
- WP:BS | Barnstars
- WP:BIO | Criteria for inclusion of biographies
- WP:CENT | Centralized discussion
- WP:CG | Categorization
- WP:CLS | Categories, lists, and series boxes
- WP:CP | Copyright problems
- WP:CSD | Criteria for speedy deletion
- WP:DP | Deletion policy
- WP:FICT | Fiction in Wikipedia
- WP:FU | Fair use
- WP:FUC | Fair use criteria
- WP:HD | Help desk
- WP:ICT | Image copyright tags
- WP:IUP | Image use policy
- WP:LA | List of administrators
- WP:MOS | Manual of Style
- WP:MUSIC | Notability and Music Guidelines
- WP:NAME | Naming conventions
- WP:NOR | No original research
- WP:RCP | RC patrol
- WP:NPA | No personal attacks
- WP:POINT | Don't disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point
- WP:PPol | Protection policy
- WP:RD | Reference desk
- WP:RFA | Requests for adminship
- WP:POST | Wikipedia Signpost
- WP:TL | Transwiki log
- WP:TS | Template standardisation
- WP:UI | Untagged images
- WP:VAIN | Vanity page
- WP:VP | Village pump
- WP:WEASEL | Avoid weasel terms
- WP:WIN | What Wikipedia is not
- WP:WINAD | Wikipedia is not a dictionary
- WP:WIWO | What is in, what is out
- WP:WS | WikiProject Wiki Syntax
- WP:WSS | WikiProject Stub sorting
- Meta:Help:EasyTimeline syntax
- Meta:Help:Inputbox
- User:Liz/Whiteboard/AT
- Special:Allmessages
- MediaWiki:Titleblacklist
- MediaWiki:Bad image list
- MediaWiki:Sitenotice
- MediaWiki:Anonnotice
- MediaWiki:Watchlist-details
- MediaWiki:Recentchangestext
- CommonsHelper
- User:Liz/Whiteboard/Sandbox
- Special:Mypage/monobook.css
- Special:Mypage/monobook.js
- Special:Mypage/myskin.css
- Special:Mypage/myskin.js
Manual of Style (MoS) |
---|
Resources for maintenance and collaboration |
---|
Cleanup |
Categories |
Create an article |
Referencing |
Stubs |
Deletion |
Polishing |
Translation into English |
Images |
Controversy |
To-do lists |
Disambiguation |
More |
|
For a listing of ongoing discussions, see the dashboard. |
Current page: //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Liz/Whiteboard
Page break
[edit]Wikipedia:Babel | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||
Search user languages |
Helpful Pages for Editing
[edit]- {{Unreferenced|date=November 2024}}{{Notability|Notability|date=November 2024}}
- {{Unreferenced|date=November 2024}} from [[WP:SPS]], "Articles and posts on Wikipedia may not be used as sources."
- {{cleanup-link rot}}
- {{BLPunsourced|date=November 2024}}
Template messages/Cleanup
Template messages/User talk namespace
- {{PubMedAuthorSearch|Last|FI}}
Templates
[edit]- Citation templates
- book
{{cite book |last= |first= |authorlink= |coauthors= |editor= |others= |title= |origdate= |origyear= |origmonth= |url= |format= |accessdate=November 27, 2024 |accessyear= |accessmonth= |edition= |series= |volume= |date= |year= |month= |publisher= |location= |language= |isbn= |oclc= |doi= |id= |pages= |chapter= |chapterurl= |quote= }}
- journal
{{cite journal |quotes= |last= |first= |authorlink= |coauthors= |date= |year= |month= |title= |journal= |volume= |issue= |pages= |publisher= |location= |issn= |pmid= |pmc= |doi= |bibcode= |oclc= |id= |url= |language= |format= |accessdate=November 27, 2024 |laysummary= |laysource= |laydate= |quote= }}
- web
{{cite web |url= |title= |accessdate=November 27, 2024 |work= |publisher= |date= }}
- news
{{cite news |first= |last= |authorlink= |author= |coauthors= |title= |url= |format= |work= |publisher= |location= |id= |pages= |page= |date= |accessdate=November 27, 2024 |language= |quote= |archiveurl= |archivedate= }}
- encyclopedia
{{cite encyclopedia |last= |first= |author= |authorlink= |coauthors= |editor= |encyclopedia= |title= |url= |accessdate=November 27, 2024 |accessyear= |accessmonth= |edition= |date= |year= |month= |publisher= |volume= |location= |id= |isbn= |doi= |pages= |quote= }}
- press release
{{cite press release |title= |publisher= |date= |url= |format= |language= |accessdate=November 27, 2024 |quote= }}
- book
- Original research
- Fact
- Weasel-inline
- Diagram needed
- Morefootnotes
{{Morefootnotes|article|date=November 2024}}
- Nofootnotes
{{Nofootnotes|article|date=November 2024}}
- Unreferenced
{{Unreferenced|date=November 2024}}
- Unreferencedsection
{{Unreferencedsection|date=November 2024}}
- Refimprove
{{Refimprove|date=November 2024}}
- Primarysources
{{Primarysources|article|date=November 2024}}
- Onesource
{{Onesource|article|date=November 2024}}
Policies
[edit]Characters
[edit]Other
[edit]Wikipedia:ISBN User:Uncle G/On notability
Clean-up lists
[edit]Translation requests
[edit]This translation system has been deprecated in favour of WP:TRANSLATION. |
|
Links
[edit]- Greenberg, Leon A. (June 1955). "The definition of an intoxicating beverage". Quarterly journal of studies on alcohol. 16 (2): 316–25. doi:10.15288/qjsa.1955.16.316. PMID 14385011.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link) Reviewed by: Welter, Ben (2008-07-09). "Thursday, July 7, 1955: Can you get drunk on beer?". Yesterday's news. Star Tribune. Retrieved 2008-07-19.In a United Press story published in the Minneapolis Tribune, a Yale man who probably managed to avoid frat houses during his undergrad years demonstrates that you can be right about all the facts and still come to the wrong conclusion.
- Tynan, Dan (2008-10-14). "Will the Real Spam King Please Stand Up?". PC World. Retrieved 2008-10-31.
It seems the bulk e-mail industry has more kings than a pinochle deck. But who is really the king of kings? The following ten spammers are all heavyweight contenders for the crown.
- Squires, Nick (2008-05-17). "What came first - the egg or the gecko inside?". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved 2008-11-01.
August 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm USERNAME. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to DOT-111 tank car seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on TALK PAGE. Thanks.
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your efforts to make constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Recent changes patrol
- Anti-vandalism tools
You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (74.51.53.80) is used to identify you instead.
In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on this page. Again, welcome!
original research
[edit]- Your edit has been reverted because it amounts to WP:OR. We rely on WP:RS secondary sources such as a newspaper for information like this. If you find a WP:RS that says the same thing as your edits, please feel free to re-add it. If not, please discuss this at the talk page. Also please familiarize yourself with WP:BRD. Thanks --
no youtube
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page ARTICLE has been reverted.
Your edit DIFF to ARTICLE was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (YOUTUBE) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:03, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.
As others have said to you on this page, please do not add original research to Wikipedia and please follow WP:BRD. You read the policy on original research at this link -- WP:OR. Thanks!
Hello, I'm USERNAME. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Lac-Mégantic derailment, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on MY TALK PAGE. Thanks.
Your recent edits
[edit]Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot
- Have you actually read WP:BRD? When you are reverted you do not re-insert your edit while discussing it. I assume you are a new user here but your editing behaviour doesn't seem to be modified by any of the comments with links to pages that would help you better understand Wikipedia policies. If you are having trouble finding the correct links I would be happy to link them for you.
3RR warning
[edit]Your recent editing history at ARTICLE shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.
Gender imbalance
[edit]I can't help but notice, as was stated above by Calliopejen1, the complete gender imbalance in this discussion about Fram's departure. Yes, there are a few women participating here but there were very few identifiable female editors and admins in the AN discussion surrounding the WMFOffice ban proposal. That stuck out like a sore thumb to me.
You can draw your own conclusions about this but this is the primary take-away I was left with after reading through much (not all) of this page and AN over the past few days. Bishonen, Risker & EllenCT's participation aside, I think the fervor of this issue is so high that what isn't obvious to some of those here is that there are many editors and admins who aren't asking for WMF's head on a platter. I'm not defending WMF's action in any way and I have NO idea of the basis of Fram's block and desysoping. I just want to point out among this outrage that there are quite a few regular editors and admins who are staying miles away from this conflict and I don't think it is because there is any fear of sticking ones neck out. My guess is that there are different perspectives on issues of harassment online. I'm not stating that Fram treated female editors differently from male editors (I honestly have no idea) but I think women are more familiar with issues of online harassment and more likely to give WMF the benefit of the doubt. Just my two cents.
Personally, I don't agree with this action and I think it should also have been handled by ArbCom. But I think we don't know all of the details and online forums are doing some dangerous speculation involving editors whose identities are public (this reminds me of GamerGate when I was doxed). I wish WMFOffice trusted ArbCom enough to give them the details necessary to evaluate this action as ArbCom has shown itself able to handle private complaints. This all could have been handled on English Wikipedia which would have been my preferred course of action. But WMF runs this network of sites and while this amazing corps of editors has, over 18 years, created a website we can all be proud of, WMF ultimately calls the shots. Maybe that fact was a shock to some but we should all be aware that any of us can be prevented from participating here and there is not a lot we can do besides signing petitions/proposals or moving our volunteer efforts to a different cause. Now, feel free to tell me to go to hell. Liz Read! Talk! 03:33, 14 June 2019 (UTC)