User:Littleteddy/Standards

I have decided that I will develop some RfA standards similar to Useight's when !voting in RfAs. When I oppose RfAs I could say 'Sorry, fails my standard: Number of Edits'.

Number of edits

• 1000 Mainspace edits

or

• 500 Mainspace edits

and

• 500 Project space edits

• Evidence of contact with other users (e.g. high use of user talk or talk pages)

• Good (80%+) use of edit summaries

• Over 3000 edits

Activity

• At least 4 months of active contribution

or

• 6000+ edits

and

• At least 3 months of active contribution

Conduct

• Has not been warned for non-vandalism edits in the last 4 months

• No (non-accidental) vandalism in the last 6 months

• No blocks in the past year

or

• No blocks since becoming an editor (where an editor has been here for less than a year)

I don't care if...

• The nominee runs a bot
• The nominee self-nominates
• The nominee is willing to add him/herself to CAT:AOR
• The nominee has edited in the userspace a lot
• The nominee focusses on WP:AfD, WP:RFPP etc.
• The nominee has few edits to WP:AIV
• The nominee runs on a three-revert rule or a one-revert rule
• The nominee has gone through admin coaching

But I do care if...

• The nominee answers only a few of the optional questions
• The nominee has only been fighting vandalism rather than being an 'all-rounder'
• The nominee is not a member of any WikiProjects
• I feel that I should apply Ignore All Rules in supporting/opposing a nominee