Jump to content

User:LittleTree/Workspace2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Nanking Massacre

The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (on May 31946) was convened to prosecute Japanese leaders for crimes against peace and humanity as well as war crimes including the Nanking Massacre. Other war crimes were treated in the local tribunals held in the Asia-Pacific region.
The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (on May 31946) and other war trials were convened to prosecute Japanese war crimes, including the Nanking Massacre.
  • 00:59, 9 September 2006 61.209.169.225 (Modern Japan - It is anti-Japan Probaganda to replace International Military Tribunal for the Far East with Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal)
The International Military Tribunal for the Far East was convened on May 31946 to prosecute Japanese war crimes.
  • 21:20, 8 September 2006 Komdori (rv vandalism -- find and add some real sources to that article if you have "proof")
The Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal was convened on May 31946 to prosecute Japanese war crimes, including war atrocities such as the Nanking Massacre.
  • 21:15, 8 September 2006 61.209.169.225 (Modern Japan - Nanking Massacre is one of anti-Japan that Chinese Communist Party promotes Probaganda.)
The Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal was convened on May 31946 to prosecute Japanese war crimes.
The Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal was convened on May 31946 to prosecute Japanese war crimes, including war atrocities such as the Nanking Massacre.
The Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal was convened on May 31946.
The Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal was convened on May 31946 to prosecute Japanese war crimes, including war atrocities such as the Nanking Massacre.
The Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal was convened on May 3.
The Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal was convened on May 31946 to prosecute Japanese war crimes, including war atrocities such as the Nanking Massacre.
  • 23:31, 1 September 2006 222.233.205.83 (Modern Japan - Balance perspective) "which were later found to be greatly exaggerated"
The controversial Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal was convened on May 31946 to prosecute alleged Japanese war crimes, including atrocities like the Nanking Massacre which were later found to be greatly exaggerated.

Nanking Massacre

[edit]

22:47, 13 November 2006 (re-introduced the sentence removed from the Revision as of 17:05, 4 November 2006, with ammendments and references.) [1]

「南京事件をどうみるか」藤原彰編 ISBN 4-250-98016-2 1998青木書店

   洞富雄(Hora Tomio)二〇万人以上 (「決定版南京大虐殺」)1982
   笠原十九司(Kasahara Tokushi)10数万以上20万近いかそれ以上

「天皇の軍隊と南京事件」吉田裕 青木書店 ISBN 4-250-98019-7 1998

   洞富雄 20万を下らない

A number of Japanese researchers consider 100,000-200,000 be an approximate value.[1]

Iwane Matsui

[edit]

23:08, 13 November 2006 [2]

was a general of the Japanese Imperial Army and the commander of the expeditionary forces sent to China. He was sentenced to death by hanging by the International Military Tribunal for the Far East for being responsible for the Nanjing Massacre.

In 1933 he became one of the initiators of Grand Asia association, and also established Taiwan-Asia Association.

XX He was personally appointed to that post by Emperor Hirohito [citation needed]

XX said to then-Prime Minister Konoe Fumimaro => said to General Sugiyama, minister of army, according to the memoir of then-Prime Minister Konoe Fumimaro[2]

On August 23, the SEF was sent to Shanghai, which was reinforced with the 10th Army commanded by Lietenant General Heisuke Yanagawa later in October. On November 7, Central China Area Army (CCAA) was organized by combining the SEF and the 10th Army, with Matsui appointed as its commander-in-chief concurrently with that of the SEF.

After winning the battles around Shanghai, the SEF suggested the Headquarters of the General Staff in Tokyo to attack Nanjing. The order was delivered on December 1 of 1937, at the same time, the CCAA was rearranged and Lieutenant General Yasuhiko, Prince of Asaka, was appointed as the commander of the SEF, while Matsui stayed as the commander of CCAA overseeing both the SEF and the 10th Army.

halted only temporarily [citation needed]

Concerning atrocities in Nanjing, Matsui noted in his war journal about rapes (December 20) and looting (December 29) and wrote it was very much regrettable that those behaviors destroyed the reputation of the Imperial Army. He also mentioned "a number of abominable incidents within the past 50 days" at the memorial service for the war-dead of the SEF held on February 7[3] and rebuted in tears the officers and the soldiers in the place, saying that atrocities done by a part of the soldiers had dropped down the reputation of the empire, such a thing should not happen in the Imperial Army, they should keep the disciplines strictly and should never persecute the inocent people, and so on[4].

Trial

[edit]

XX Tojo Hideki => Hideki Tojo


The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE), also known as the Tokyo Trials, the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal or simply as the Tribunal, was convened to try the leaders of the Empire of Japan for three types of crimes: "Class A" (crimes against peace), "Class B" (war crimes), and "Class C" (crimes against humanity) - committed during World War II. War crimes charges against more junior personnel, such as the Rape of Nanking, were dealt with separately, in other cities throughout the Asia-Pacific region.
  • 08:16, 20 July 2006 70.38.182.118 (factual error, rape of nanking never a charge, look at list of charges at bottom, those trialed for nanking were done so in china only)
The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE), also known as the Tokyo Trials, the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal or simply as the Tribunal, was convened to try the leaders of the Empire of Japan for three types of crimes: "Class A" (crimes against peace), "Class B" (war crimes), and "Class C" (crimes against humanity) - committed during World War II. War crimes charges against more junior personnel were dealt with separately, in other cities throughout the Asia-Pacific region.
This article deals with the trials of Japanese politicians and senior military officers in relation to incidents during World War II. For more general information see: Japanese war crimes.
The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE), also known as the Tokyo Trials, the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal or simply as the Tribunal, was convened to try the leaders of the Empire of Japan for three types of crimes: "Class A" (crimes against peace), "Class B" (war crimes), and "Class C" (crimes against humanity) - committed during World War II, including some incidents such as the Nanjing Massacre. War crimes charges against more junior personnel were dealt with separately, in other cities throughout the Asia-Pacific region.
The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (IMTFE)[5] was held to try the leaders of Japan for three types of crimes - "Class A" (crimes against peace), "Class B" (war crimes), and "Class C" (crimes against humanity) - committed during World War II, including some incidents such as the Nanjing Massacre. It did not cover individual Japanese war crimes. Those were dealt with separately, in other cities throughout the Asia-Pacific region.
The International Military Tribunal for the Far East (also referred to as the IMTFE, the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal, or the Tokyo Trial) was held to try the leaders of Japan for three types of crimes - "Class A" crimes against peace, "Class B" war crimes, and "Class C" crimes against humanity - committed during World War II, including some incidents such as the Nanjing Massacre. It did not cover individual Japanese war crimes. Those were dealt with separately, in other cities throughout the Asia-Pacific region.
  • 00:54, 14 November 2006 (→Torture - details of ref.) [3]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ KASAHARA Tokushi states "more than 100,000 and close to 200,000, or maybe more", referring to his own book Nankin jiken Iwanami shinsho (FUJIWARA Akira (editor) Nankin jiken o dou miruka 1998 Aoki shoten, ISBN 4-250-98016-2, p.18). This estimation includes the surrounding area outside of the city of Nanking, which is objected by a Chinese researcher (the same book, p.146). HORA Tomio concludes "more than 200,000" in his book (Nankin jiken o dou miruka p.123, YOSHIDA Hiroshi Tennou no guntai to Nankin jiken 1998 Aoki shoten, ISBN 4-250-98019-7, p.160). HORA Tomio writes 50,000-100,000 (TANAKA Masaaki What Really Happened in Nanking 2000 Sekai Shuppan, Inc. http://www.sdh-fact.com/ ISBN 4-916079-07-8, p.5).
  2. ^ YOSHIDA Hiroshi Tennou no guntai to Nankin jiken 1998 Aoki shoten, ISBN 4-250-98019-7, p.71
  3. ^ Higashinakano Shudo THE NANKING MASSACRE: Fact Versus Fiction 2005 Sekai Shuppan, Inc. http://www.sdh-fact.com/ ISBN4-916079-12-4, ISBN4-916079-13-2, p.171; the original Japanese edition: Nankin gyakusatsu no tettei kensho 1998 Tendensha ISBN4-88656-153-5 C0021, p.263)
  4. ^ YOSHIDA Hiroshi Tennou no guntai to Nankin jiken 1998 Aoki shoten, ISBN 4-250-98019-7, p.164
  5. ^ The International Military Tribunal for the Far East is also referred to as the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal, or the Tokyo Trial. Within documents relating to the IMTFE it is also called simply as the Tribunal

References

[edit]
  • Haruko Taya Cook & Theodore F. Cook, Japan at War, 1993 ISBN 1-56584-039-9
  • HIGASHINAKANO Shudo THE NANKING MASSACRE: Fact Versus Fiction 2005 Sekai Shuppan, Inc. ISBN4-916079-12-4, ISBN4-916079-13-2, http://www.sdh-fact.com/ (Original Japanese edition: Nankin gyakusatsu no tettei kensho 1998 Tendensha ISBN4-88656-153-5 C0021)
  • YOSHIDA Hiroshi Tennou no guntai to Nankin jiken 1998 Aoki shoten, ISBN4-250-98019-7.


[edit]

http://www.history.gr.jp/~koa_kan_non/