User:Liaog2022/sandbox

Evaluation subsections of the article "Enantiomers"

Evaluating content

• Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic?
  • Yes, throughout the article, everything relates to the topic of enantiomers.
• Is there anything that distracted you?
  • Because the article only contained diagrams of organic molecules and text explaining each of the sections, nothing about the article had been distracting in a negative way.
• Is any info out of date?
  • All of the information presented in the article seemed to be up to date.
• Anything missing?
  • In regards to the displayed subsections and contents, everything seemed to be in order and included.
• What else could be improved?
  • One thing I think the article could have improved on would be the different examples of enantiomerism since the article only contained two such examples, which is an interesting concept that I believed could have been explored further in the article.

Evaluating tone

• Is it neutral?
  • The article follows a strict scientific tone that consists of cold-hard facts derived from various credible sources.
• Any biased claims?
  • No biased claims were evident.
• Are viewpoints under or overrepresented?
  • The sources the author used had all been used in a fair amount relative to the importance of the contents to the topic of the article, therefore no viewpoints were under or overrepresented by the article.

Evaluating sources

• Do links work for citations?
  • All of the links seemed to be in working order.
• Does source support claims in article?
  • The source does support claims in the article.
• Is each fact referenced with appropriate, reliable reference?
  • Yes, the referenced facts had all been referenced with appropriate and reliable references.
• Where does this info come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is this bias noted?
  • The info referenced mostly comes from dictionaries and textbooks, therefore they were all neutral sources.

Checking talk page

• What kinds of conversations are going on about how to represent this topic?
  • The conversations had mostly been about either the pictures represented in the article, grammar and word choice, importance and validity of various parts of the article (which had been removed), and different explanations of how to make the article more understandable.
• How is article rated? Is it part of any WikiProjects?
  • In terms of the quality scale, the article had been rated as "Start" while in terms of the importance scale, the article had been rated as "High". The project seems to be a part of the WikiProject Chemistry according to the Talk page.
• Any difference between this and how the subject was taught in class?
  • The only difference between this and how it was taught in class had been the fact that this covered a larger range of information but much more shallower.