User:Lavendergardener/Ye College Inn/Janekraaijvanger Peer Review

Peer review

Complete your peer review exercise below, providing as much constructive criticism as possible. The more detailed suggestions you provide, the more useful it will be to your classmate. Make sure you consider each of the following aspects:

Lead

Guiding questions:

Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

Guiding questions:

Is the content added relevant to the topic?
Is the content added up-to-date?
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

Guiding questions:

Is the content added neutral?
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
Does the content added attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

Guiding questions:

Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say? (You'll need to refer to the sources to check this.)
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
Are the sources current?
Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization

Guiding questions:

Is the content added well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
Does the content added have any grammatical or spelling errors?
Is the content added well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

Guiding questions: If your peer added images or media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
Are images well-captioned?
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

For New Articles Only

If the draft you're reviewing is for a new article, consider the following in addition to the above.

Does the article meet Wikipedia's Notability requirements - i.e. Is the article supported by 2-3 reliable secondary sources independent of the subject?
How exhaustive is the list of sources? Does it accurately represent all available literature on the subject?
Does the article follow the patterns of other similar articles - i.e. contain any necessary infoboxes, section headings, and any other features contained within similar articles?
Does the article link to other articles so it is more discoverable?

Overall impressions

Guiding questions:

Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
What are the strengths of the content added?
How can the content added be improved?

Examples of good feedback

A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.

Peer review of "Homemaking"
Peer review of this article about a famous painting

Additional Resources

Check out the Editing Wikipedia PDF for general editing tips and suggestions.

General info

Whose work are you reviewing?

Lavendergardener

Link to draft you're reviewing
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ye_College_Inn&diff=1253472745&oldid=1219130420
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists): Ye College Inn

Evaluate the drafted changes

Lead:

The lead is great and edited to be much more understandable in terms of the location itself, I also liked that you shifted the part about the developer to the following paragraph

Content

Overall I thought your content was really great and focused on the facts and the history of the building, the only suggestion I would think about is adding the Charles Cowen paragraph to the "history" section. I am a little confused what information you have added and if you added that entire table of information
The content is obviously up to date as you went straight to the source by using their records. I think it would be smart to maybe add a section around "what its like now" just to make the whole thing flow better

Tone:

The tone is great and extremely informative with a great wikipedia voice / no bias could have been easy to make it into a "ad" for the inn but you made it clear not too.
Such a special historical spot and it was really cool to learn more

Sources:

I think it would be great if you were able to add more sources but I understand that is tricky due to the topic,
Your use of their records was extremely beneficial and not alot of articles on wiki are able to do so

Organization:

already touched on it a little but I think that if you were to break it up more sectionally it would make the entire page that much stronger. Even though it isn't that long of a page it makes a huge difference for the reader experience.

Overall impressions:

So impressive and you clearly spent a lot of time on this and it shows. A few basic fixes and I think you will be all good to go! Great work