User:Kmblng/Big Five personality traits and culture/Bibliography
You will be compiling your bibliography and creating an outline of the changes you will make in this sandbox.
Bibliography
As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:
|
Bibliography
[edit]Feher, A., & Vernon, P. A. (2021). Looking beyond the Big Five: A selective review of alternatives to the Big Five model of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 169, 110002.[1]
- This review analyzes other personality inventories and how they compare/contrast to the Big 5 Personality traits. We will use this in the section of our article called "criticism" to share other possible models and how they might be better or worse than the Big 5.
Chen, Y. W., & Canli, T. (2022). “Nothing to see here”: No structural brain differences as a function of the Big Five personality traits from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Personality Neuroscience, 5, e8.[2]
- This review concentrates on what is wrong with the Big Five Personality traits and how these traits are not as valid as they previously were. Data and experiment provide as proof towards rethinking the biological basis of identifying personality traits- including the Big Five Personality traits.
Examples:
|
References
[edit]- ^ Feher, Anita; Vernon, Philip A. (2021-02). "Looking beyond the Big Five: A selective review of alternatives to the Big Five model of personality". Personality and Individual Differences. 169: 110002. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.110002.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - ^ Chen, Yen-Wen; Canli, Turhan (2022-01). ""Nothing to see here": No structural brain differences as a function of the Big Five personality traits from a systematic review and meta-analysis". Personality Neuroscience. 5: e8. doi:10.1017/pen.2021.5. ISSN 2513-9886. PMC 9379932. PMID 35991756.
{{cite journal}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help)CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
Outline of proposed changes
[edit]Click on the edit button to draft your outline.
Now that you have compiled a bibliography, it's time to plan out how you'll improve your assigned article.
In this section, write up a concise outline of how the sources you've identified will add relevant information to your chosen article. Be sure to discuss what content gap your additions tackle and how these additions will improve the article's quality. Consider other changes you'll make to the article, including possible deletions of irrelevant, outdated, or incorrect information, restructuring of the article to improve its readability or any other change you plan on making. This is your chance to really think about how your proposed additions will improve your chosen article and to vet your sources even further. Note: This is not a draft. This is an outline/plan where you can think about how the sources you've identified will fill in a content gap. |