User:Kevin Gorman/lee
Appearance
Carole Lee |
---|
Carole Lee is an Assistant Professor at the University of Washington, Seattle.[1] Lee's research focuses on the epistemological and methodological lessons that can be learned from empirical research on judgment bias, especially judgment bias during the peer review process.[2]
Education and career
[edit]Lee received her bachelor's degree in philosophy in 1999 fom Wellesley College and went on to receive her doctorate in philosophy from the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor in 2006.[3]
Research areas
[edit]She studies bias in the peer review process.[4] The process tends to select by seniority rather than innovation.[5]
In 2015, she spoke at the PEERE conference in Lisbon.[6]
Publications
[edit]- Lee, Carole J.; Sugimoto, Cassidy R.; Zhang, Guo; Cronin, Blaise (2013-01-01). "Bias in peer review". Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 64 (1): 2–17. doi:10.1002/asi.22784. ISSN 1532-2890.
- J. Saul; M. Brownstein (eds.). "Revisiting Current Causes of Women's Underrepresentation in Science". Implicit Bias and Philosophy Volume 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology (PDF). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
References
[edit]- ^ DesAutels, Peggy. "Carole Lee: December 2013". Highlighted Philosophers. American Philosophical Association. Retrieved 5 January 2014.
- ^ "Carole J. Lee". University of Washington, Seattle. Retrieved 5 January 2014.
- ^ Lee, Carole. "Curriculum Vitae" (PDF). University of Washington. Retrieved 5 January 2014.
- ^ Longino, Helen (2016-01-01). Zalta, Edward N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2016 ed.).
- ^ "Push for Innovative Research Is Hitting a Budget Wall, NIH Director Says". The Chronicle of Higher Education. 2013-02-20. Retrieved 2016-10-08.
- ^ "Carole J. Lee will talk on bias in peer review at the Lisbon meeting, 27-29 January 2015 | Peere". Retrieved 2016-10-08.
Potential sources to be used
[edit]- Review http://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&hl=en&cites=5931083754398850182 to see if any substantial coverage is floating around
- Ditto http://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&hl=en&cites=8087225120665328003,7426216243730865192
- still fails the gng