User:Kaldari/Flagcruft

People like flags. People really, really like cute little flag icons. Occasionally, an editor will be overcome by this seemingly innocuous affinity, and like Hernando de Soto , will start planting flags on everything in sight. This habit usually starts out innocently enough—perhaps on an article about Olympic gymnastics. "Wow" they think, "those flag icons really add some visual chutzpah ." Soon, they're moving on to Nobel Prize winners, game consoles, and lists of supermarkets. Before you know it, Wikipedia looks more like a brochure for a travel agency than an encyclopedia. Some of you may ask, "what's the harm in adding flag icons?" Others may ask, "don't you love America ?" Here are some reasons not to add unnecessary flag icons:

• They add no information to the article that you can't get from reading it
• They are more difficult to read for visually impaired people (e.g. colour blind or those who rely on text-to-speech software)
• They make articles look like Pokémon trading cards
• The Confederate States of America is not a country, nor is North America
• They certainly don't make the pages load faster on a slow connection
• Flags are not necessarily easier to recognize than country names. Take, for example, Australia and New Zealand .
• Flags open the door to disputes unrelated to article content. Is it London or London ?
• Flags place unequal emphasis on location, especially in infoboxes. With a flag, Paul McCartney is English . Without a flag, he is an English rock singer and songwriter who was in The Beatles.

So the next time you feel the urge to stick some flags into your favorite infobox, ask yourself if they really add anything to the article, or if instead they are merely an expression of that curious human instinct to assign ownership of everything in the universe to a particular territory.