Jump to content

User:Jway04/sandbox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Disease in Imperial Rome

[edit]

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Disease in imperial rome)

Jump to navigationJump to search

During the Imperial Period of Rome, disease was a harsh reality of life. As the borders of the empire continuously expanding and the population steadily growing, cities in the Roman Empire were exposed to a multitude of diseases. The afflictions ranged in severity, some being catastrophic and others being not quite as deadly. The most infinite of plagues during this period was the Antonine Plague (165-180 CE). As said by the Roman physician Galen, "This populous city, where daily ten thousand people can be discovered suffering from jaundice, and ten thousand from dropsy." While there are few documents remaining from the time period documenting demographics, there are many modern technologies that provide more data as to why certain diseases were much more deadly than others.

Contents

[edit]

Causes[edit]

[edit]

Hygiene[edit]

[edit]

Roman Sewage and Aqueduct Systems [edit]

[edit]

The Roman Empire has garnered itself a mostly positive reputation for the complicated sewer systems that ran underneath many of it's cities. While they may have been engineering marvels and precedent setting, there were still major flaws in Roman sewer systems. Roman engineering brought water to the city from the Alban Hills thanks to the aqueduct system implemented in 312 BCE[1] . Although primitive forms of sewage systems have existed in Rome since pre-empirical times, these were mostly primitive drains that lead to the nearby rivers and streams. As the skills of engineers continued to grow, the complexity of the sewers did as well. For example, the Cloaca Maxima was one the first complex and expansive sewer systems that ran under Rome.[2]

Even though the systems became more and more complex, the population of Rome and other cities in the empire steadily grew increasing the strain on the waste systems. One infamous hazard to health was the lead piping used to transport water throughout the city, although it may have not been as much of a public health risk as once thought. Lead was very prominent in Roman beverages. This is mostly due to the lead-based storage containers that were popular during the time.[3] Some scholars speculate that the levels of alcohol consumed on a daily basis were more to blame for the health ailments of the aristocrats of Rome, with the average consumption rate being approximately 3 bottles of wine a day.[4]It is important to note that the practice of diluting wine was common as the source mentions. The sewer systems were extremely complex in their design, and for the most part succeeded in providing Romans with adequate supplies of relatively clean water for consumption and bathing. This was supplemented by public health laws concerning street disposal of public waste. Most of the large outbreaks and public health crises cannot be directly attributed to the sewer systems of Rome, there were many other more serious factors that added to the catastrophe of the major public health crises of Imperial Rome. Also, since most sewer systems were privately owned, they were privately maintained and in turn neglected. Instead, citizens would turn to their latrines; if they lived on anything but the ground floor they would even throw their excrement onto the street. This led to exposure of sewage to flies, dogs, and bacteria, all of which helped spread disease among Romans.

Litter Pollution

The city of Rome also faced a major problem with street garbage and the build up of trash. Poets and satirists often made the Roman litter problem the subject of jokes and writings, with descriptions of trash being everywhere, including in Roman households and on the floor.[5]The lack of sanitation on the streets and households of Rome did contribute to disease and sickness. Trash objects could range from discarded household items to actual human waste, meaning contamination chances were very high. The Romans realized this was becoming a problem, and a series of laws and other measures were taken to limit garbage build up in the streets. There is evidence to suggest this went as far as to allow waste carriages to go throughout the city and collect during hours where these modes of transportation were banned.[5] The measures ranged from fines that held the person disposing of the waste accountable. Although most of these measures were implemented in order to prevent pedestrian casualties from waste falling on them, inconsequently it increased the public health by eliminating the waste from the immediate city.[4]These measures did not completely solve the problem as most of the waste was just moved outside the city limits meaning the risk for contamination and odour would certainly have been present.

Bathing [edit]

[edit]

Bath houses both public and private were common in Rome during the Imperial period of Rome. Commonly referred to as Thermal, these bath houses varied widely, but most had similar stages. Occupants would exercise, use a variety of saunas and cooling rooms and sometimes get to swim in a pool.[6] When the heated bath water was not chemically cleansed or filtered with chemicals such as chlorine, bacteria thrived and spread. When Christianity came to Rome, it saw the public nudity of the bathing system and saw it as debauchery and therefore frowned upon. While the bathing system may not have been pristine, abstaining from cleanliness altogether brought upon many more potentially fatal diseases, especially in infants. Even an imperial-version sauna was created for cleansing the body of toxins.

Diet [edit]

[edit]

From analyzing public latrines in the ash-preserved city of Hercaleum, researchers were able to determine the diet to be largely derivative from a variety of fish species.The diet of the town seemed to be supplemented with spices, some originating from India as well as eggs. It seems that the occupants of Hercaleum had a well rounded diet and although the diet of Roman citizens may have changed depending on the region it seems that food was accessible from a variety of places that the Romans traded with.[7]

In contrast to today's diet, Romans ate little meat. According to scholar Linda Gigante, they consumed large amounts of grain, fruits, and some vegetables. The poor were given monthly supplies of grain and hardly had money to pay for anything else. Due to this, many Romans suffered from malnutrition and multiple vitamin deficiencies. Even those who had money for food didn’t always have the best choices. There was no food and drug regulatory agency in ancient times, so low food standards brought contamination and parasites. Also apparent is the water quality. The Roman Army’s drinking from the contaminated Tiber River contributed to their vulnerability to many diseases.

Environment[edit]

[edit]

Population Density [edit]

[edit]

Rome's population was unprecedentedly large in the ancient world, reaching 1 million during the high point of the Empire[8]. This was much larger than the other major cultures that co-existed and predated the Romans. Paired with the poor living conditions that many Romans experienced, the city was a perfect breeding grounds for disease. In the poor boroughs of Rome, tight living conditions and filth increased the spread of disease. The Antonine and Cyprian plagues were transmitted through touch, which only added to the severity of the plagues, especially in areas of poverty.

Deforestation and Malaria [edit]

Deforestation of Rome's cities, particularly near the Tiber River, led to higher disease rates. The causality is as follows: deforestation lead to a rising water table, which increased marshes. This increased the larva in Rome, and in turn increased disease borne from blood-sucking bugs. As in many of today's third world countries, mosquitos and other vectors were carriers of various diseases, such as malaria and the Ross River virus.

Diseases[edit]

[edit]

Influenza, colds, and other ailments were just as apparent, if not more, in Imperial Rome as in today's life. However, they had many more noteworthy afflictions from catastrophic plagues to sexually transmitted diseases.

Plagues [edit]

[edit]

The Antonine Plague [edit]

[edit]

The Antonine Plague is certainly one of the most infamous plagues in Roman history. Having no immunity to the plague, which was brought from soldiers returning form campaign in Western Asia, lead to catastrophic results for the Romans.[[9]]The main symptoms included diarrhea, skin sores and irritations and sore throats.[6] The legions were hit by the plague hard, with cramped conditions and living quarters, the disease spread violently, reportedly decimating the Roman forces.[7] Evidently, the plague hit the civilian population of the City and Empire of Rome. Emperor Marcus Aurelius implemented several changes which suggest the sire status of the Empire. This included loosening the regulations for membership of higher councils in multiple important settlements throughout the empire, including Athens.[9]Egypt was another region that saw catastrophic loss in the populations of their cities, this was demonstrated in the papyrus scripts documenting the loss in revenue from the massive decrease in population. The entire empire was facing hardship from the plague. Public building projects ceased in many of the provinces' major cities, including London. This all simultaneously happening while the empire faced attacks from the Sarmatians in the east.[7]It is estimated that up to 15% of the Roman population was wiped out during the ten year plague, including Emperor Marcus Aurelius in 180 CE.[8]It is widely believed that the plague was what is now known as smallpox. This can be determined largely due to the notes and commentary from famed Greek physician Galen.[8]It is estimated that the Antonine Plague's impact on the Roman Empire was devastating and the effects lasted for centuries after the fact, some historians arguing that it permanently crippled the Empire and assisted in it's death.[9]

The Plague of Cyprian [edit]

[edit]

The Plague of Cyprian (249-262 AD) caused widespread shortages across the empire, and was one of the major contributing factors to the Crisis of the Third Century.[10] Although considered to be separate from the Antonine Plague, it is very similar and also believed to have also originated from smallpox, or perhaps measles. Saint Cyprian makes the most vivid description of the effects of the disease as dysentery, loss of motor skills, and of course fever, and in turn has the disease named after him (also possibly due to the oppression of Christianity at the time). The Plague of Cyprian actually increased the membership of the Catholic Church as the Roman populace suffered their second major plague, faith was being lost in Rome and found in the Christian God.[11] The plague spread from Asia into Alexandria, moving it's way into major port cities and soon throughout the entire empire. Accounts in North Africa from the Christians note the sheer death toll and daily events of death.[11]Notably, the symptom list does not include skin rashes or swelling, which is the main separation from the bubonic plague and Antonine Plague. The plague did exhibit some unique symptoms including haemorrhages, giving the plague a bloody and infamous reputation.[11] This plague was very widespread, possibly originating in Ethiopia and spreading to Scotland. With the skin contact-spreading nature of the disease and the crowded civilization style in Rome, the death toll was tremendous in the empire.

Blood-borne diseases[edit]

[edit]

Morbus Gallicus (Syphilis) [edit]

[edit]

Morbus Gallicus, better known in modern times as syphilis, or the "French Disease" was not prominent in ancient Europe but with recent bone studies, it has been found that a type of European treponematoses bacteria may have even affected children. However, according to an article published by Kristin Harper in 2008, ancient European civilizations may have suffered from a related form of the bacteria but not venereal syphilis itself, which may have had its origin in the pre-Columbian Americas. The term ‘syphilis" was coined later on by a 15th-century Italian poet Girolamo Fracastoro, who wrote an epic poem of a boy named Syphilus who insulted Apollo, and was in turn punished with the disease. During the Medieval and Renaissance periods the likely mutated forms of the treponematoses resulted in epidemics. Syphilis in pre columbian Europe is a topic widely debated by historians to date, and it's existence in Imperial Rome is a still debated topic to date.

Mentagra[edit]

[edit]

Mentagra, notably thought by the Imperial Romans to be spread by kissing, was a skin disease most commonly starting in the chin and moving on to the entire face and sometimes other body parts. The aesthetic factor was very unappealing, while the disease was hardly adverse to health at all. Even though it was not dangerous, Romans ironically went as far as scar-inducing cauterizations to rid them of the abhorrent disease. The affliction did spread widely across Europe, Pliny the Elder describing them as unsightly but unharmful to the afflicted.[12]The scaly rash was known to spread from the chin and face to the rest of the body.

Air Pollution

[edit]

The air in Rome was undoubtedly polluted, with many sources remarking on the odours that could be found walking around the city. There were multiple sources for Rome's air pollution, open fires and human waste just being some of it. This degree of waste also attracted rodents and pests of all natures, only adding to the n=concerns for public health. It wasn't until the rule of Emperor Domitian that air pollution was attempted to be taken care of within the city. Laws were passed with the threat of fines and regulations that helped to attempt and clean the air. Diseases such as cholera were rampant and can be directly attributed to the waste pollution as well as air pollution.

Relevant study[edit]

[edit]

An extensive study done by Mario Novak and Mario Slaus found many skeletal remains available for examination in one specific colony in ancient Rome, Colonia Iulia Iader also known as Zadar. With tests it was found that the mean age of death for men was 37.4 years (with a standard deviation of 9.43 years), and for women was 38.4 years (with a standard deviation of 9.29 years). While this is only a sample representation of our study population, it could give reasonable insights to the whole of Rome. In the remains, several indicators of nutritional stress were found widespread among certain age groups. With the rates of these nutritional problems, it was even found that Romans favored male children in things like breastfeeding, leaving the females with higher rates of malnutrition. Periostitis was also found in many samples, with a frequency indicating overcrowding and overall poor quality of life.

Treatment[edit]

[edit]

Rome had a few prominent physicians in its Imperial era who came up with treatment for various diseases, and were generally the only source of medicinal information. Their service was focused on the military, which was often the most vulnerable group to any given disease. Dioscorides served under Emperor Nero, experimenting with surgical techniques and medicinal herbs. Pliny the Elder also had a strong focus on botany, well known for his herbal knowledge. Galen, perhaps the most prominent Roman physician, studied anatomy as well as herbal remedies.[citation needed]

Herbal medicines[edit]

[edit]

Natural medicine was of great importance, seeing as they could not synthetically manufacture anything. Many traces of herbs at ancient Roman army bases have been found, as well as medicated wine. Army doctors had knowledge of the herbs, and perhaps even grew their own in their respective gardens. The Romans were not correct with all of the herbs uses, but a placebo effect possibly still made some of the herbs useful.


Updated References

  1. ^ Society, National Geographic (2018-07-06). "Roman Aqueducts". National Geographic Society. Retrieved 2020-03-11.
  2. ^ "Roman Sewers Facts & Information | Year 7 Study Worksheet". School History. 2016-06-25. Retrieved 2020-03-11.
  3. ^ "Lead Poisoning and Rome". penelope.uchicago.edu. Retrieved 2020-03-11.
  4. ^ a b "Lead Poisoning and Rome". penelope.uchicago.edu. Retrieved 2020-03-11.
  5. ^ a b Havlíček and Morcinek, Filip and Miroslav (30 Dec 2016). "Waste and Pollution in the Ancient Roman Empire". Journal of Landscape Ecology. Volume 9 Issue 3 – via JSTOR. {{cite journal}}: |volume= has extra text (help)
  6. ^ "Thermae | Roman bath". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2020-03-11.
  7. ^ Killgrove and Tykot, Kristina and Robert (2013). "Food for Rome: A stable isotope investigation of diet in the Imperial period (1st-3rd centuries AD)". Journal of Anthropological Archaeology.
  8. ^ "Ancient Rome: Life in the City". www.ducksters.com. Retrieved 2020-03-11.
  9. ^ a b Elliott, Colin P. (May 2016). "The Antonine Plague, Climate Change and Local Violence in Roman Egypt". Past and Present. 231: 3–31.

References[edit]

[edit]
  1. ^ Jump up to: a b
  2. ^ Hansen, Roger D. "Water and Wastewater Systems in Imperial Rome." Water History. n.p. n.d. Web. 5 October 2013. http://www.waterhistory.org/histories/rome/.
  3. ^ Stuller, Jay. "Cleanliness has only recently become a virtue." Academic Search Premier. n.p. n.d. Web. 5 October 2013. http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=f4bc1306-4dfd-408b-a8a5-6be498f5492a%40sessionmgr198&vid=1&hid=123&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=aph&AN=9103042983.
  4. ^ Gigante, Linda. "Death and Disease in Ancient Rome." Innominate Society. n.p. n.d. Web. 5 October 2013. http://www.innominatesociety.com/Articles/Death%20and%20Disease%20in%20Ancient%20Rome.htm
  5. ^ Cook, Angus, Andrew Jardine, Lara O’Sullivan, and Philip Weinstein. "Deforestation, Mosquitoes, and Ancient Rome". Academic Search Premier. n.p. n.d. Web. 5 October 2013. http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=cc04577b-3b35-4782-b8bf-231e6cc1907b%40sessionmgr111&vid=6&hid=123.
  6. ^ Martin Sicker, (2000). "The Struggle over the Euphrates Frontier". The Pre-Islamic Middle East. (Greenwood) 2000:p.169 ISBN 0-275-96890-1.
  7. ^ Murphy, Verity. "Past Pandemics that Ravaged Europe." BBC. n.p. 7 November 2005. Web. 5 October 2013. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4381924.stm.
  8. ^ Jump up to: a b c
  9. ^ Kohn, George Childs. "Plague of Cyprian." Encyclopedia of Plague and Pestilence: From Ancient Times to the Present, Third Edition. New York: Facts On File, Inc., 2008. Ancient and Medieval History Online. Facts On File, Inc. 5 October 2013. http://www.fofweb.com/History/HistRefMain.asp?iPin=ENPP140&SID=2&DatabaseName=Ancient+and+Medieval+History+Online&InputText=%22Saint+Cyprian%22&SearchStyle=&dTitle=plague+of+Cyprian&TabRecordType=All+Records&BioCountPass=3&SubCountPass=2&DocCountPass=0&ImgCountPass=0&MapCountPass=0&FedCountPass=&MedCountPass=0&NewsCountPass=0&RecPosition=4&AmericanData=&WomenData=&AFHCData=&IndianData=&WorldData=&AncientData=Set&GovernmentData=.
  10. ^ Beard, Mary. "Pompeii Skeletons Reveal Secrets of Roman Family Life." BBC. n.p. 13 December 2010. Web. 5 October 2010. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11952322.
  11. ^
  12. ^ Killgrove, Kristina. "Morbus Gallicus in the Roman Empire." Powered by Osteons. n.p. 17 October 2011. Web. 5 October 2013. http://www.poweredbyosteons.org/2011/10/morbus-gallicus-in-roman-empire.html.
  13. ^ Thompson, Andrew. "Malaria and the Fall of Rome." BBC. n.p. 17 February 2011. Web. 5 October 2013. http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient/romans/malaria_01.shtml.
  14. ^
  15. ^
  16. ^ "The Military Medicine of Ancient Rome." Science and Its Times. Ed. Neil Schlager and Josh Lauer. Vol. 1. Detroit: Gale, 2001. World History In Context. Web. 5 October 2013. http://ic.galegroup.com/ic/whic/ReferenceDetailsPage/ReferenceDetailsWindow?zid=7a6408a0d3ad1dc47110c6f113b7595b&action=2&catId=&documentId=GALE%7CCV2643450064&userGroupName=lith7757&jsid=df5bb02a963d9ab7844f7d5c4ac37ddd

Categories: