The user appears to have an alternate account, whose use has not been clearly justified. Although it is not the duty of other editors to question another user's use of an account, as it may be a sensitive issue, Olowe2011 seemed to have clearly identified that the usage of his alternate account User:Wiki-Impartial is for DRN volunteering purposes here. However, expressing privacy concerns is different from becoming defensive/offensive towards others' conduct, simply for asking a question about their alternate account here. That seemingly defensive behavior in multiple places, including ANI, seems to raise an issue. The user's usage of the account seems to most closely associated with "designated roles" under the legitimate uses of alternate accounts found here; however, being a DRN volunteer does not classify as a "designated role" on Wikipedia. --JustBerry (talk) 14:01, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
The user appears to have concern with users that revert are against their edits and seems to be particularly favorable towards those who support his edits through giving of barnstars, etc. Although giving barnstars is certainly encouraged, the dynamic of the situation seems concerning. Speaking of which, User:Olowe2011's comment on ANI that I was biased in choosing to comment on their case is simply not true. Not only was I asked by a helpee on IRC to take a look into issues with the user's article tagging, in which the user had supposedly created their own version of CSD/maintenance tags on their own userspace, but the question of the concerning alternate account was also being discussed here yesterday. The issue about the maintenance tag addressed here seems to raise concern as well.
The 500 word limit summary stops here. Additional comments and questions below. --JustBerry (talk) 15:32, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Acknowledged over 500 words, collapsing comments and questions. --JustBerry (talk) 15:56, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
Question: @Olowe2011: It appears that multiple edits of yours have come from users that are supposedly biased, as per statement #1 above. Can you walk through exactly how you can jump to this conclusion? Question: @Olowe2011:This is a fairly objective statement. How do you perceive this as "anti-Olowe2011"? Question: @Olowe2011: The discussion is not "anti-Olowe2011," but your statements do raise some concern. How is this dictatorial? Primefac appears to be helping you by asking you to clarify the usage of your alternate account to avoid potential issues arising at WP:SPI. Comment: Regarding calling Drmies to the ANI report, it was already made clear to Olowe2011 here that Drmies was called, as they appeared to be active at ANI, to which Olowe2011 had already acknowledged here. Seems like a pile on or WP:Forumshop to me.
Comment: In all fairness, Bbb23 had also agreed with Drmies's comment. Not to mention, you had a right to call an administrator to look at the issue as well. Quite frankly, which administrator looked at the issue doesn't appear to be a problem, as you can see with Samwalton9 uninvolved statement in this case request. Also, I believe I've taken out adequate time to explain WP:AGF to you and that it's not worth arguing endlessly over this. I no longer really wish to comment on this case request and believe that it is not worth continuing. Let's leave it to the committee members, shall we?
