User:Jts1882/phylogeny/legumes
This page will hold a variety of drafts for modifying existing articles and some phylogenetic and taxonomic resources.
Leguminosae
[edit]Subfamilies according to the Legume Phylogeny Working Group 2017
Tribal classification
[edit]| Traditional | Modern (LPWG, 2017) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subfamily | Tribe | Subtribe | LPWG Subfamilies | |
| Caesalpinioideae [a] | Cercideae | Cercidinae | Cercidoideae | |
| Bauhiniinae | ||||
| Detarieae [b] | Detarioideae | |||
| Cassieae [c] | Duparquetiinae (monogeneric) |
Duparquetuoideae | ||
| Dialiiinae | Dialioideae[d] | |||
| Labicheinae [e] | ||||
| Ceratoniinae (monogeneric) |
Caesalpinioideae | |||
| Cassinae [=Cassieae sensu stricto] | ||||
| Caesalpinieae [f]
| ||||
| Mimosoideae | Mimoseae [g] | Mimosoid clade | ||
| Ingeae | ||||
| Acacieae | ||||
| Mimozygantheae | ||||
| Papilionoideae | 24-32 tribes | Papilionoideae | ||
- ^ Polhill (1994) divided subfamily Caesalpinioideae into four tribes[1]
- ^ traditionally included genus Umtiza, which now is part of the Umtiza clade of tribe Caesalpinieae
- ^ Irwln & Barneby (1981) divided tribe Cassieae into five subtribes.[2]
- ^ Also includes Poeppigia, which forms the monogeneric Poeppigia group of tribe Caesalpinieae in Polhill & Vidal (1981).
- ^ merged into Dialiinaee and becomes part of LPWG subfamily Dialioideae
- ^ paraphyletic wrt Cassieae sensu stricto and Mimosoideae; now includes Umtiza clade from Detarieae] [becomes recircumcribed subfamily Caesalpinioideae in LPWG-2017]
- ^ Lewis (2005) included tribe Parkieae of Lewis & Elias (1981) within Mimoseae
Caesalpinioidea
[edit]Subfamily Caesalpinioideae is one of the three traditional subfamilies of legumes, along with Mimosoideae and Papilionoideae (or Faboideae), and has been divided into four tribes, Cercideae, Detarieae, Cassieae and Caesalpinieae. However, recent work, mainly studies of molecular markers, have shown that Caesalpinioideae as traditionally circumscribed is paraphyletic with respect to both the other two subfamilies and that neither tribe Cassieae nor Caesalpinieae are monophyletic. As a result, the Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG) proposed a new classification with six monophyletic subfamilies. Papilionoideae was retained with some generic transfers. The caesalpinioid tribes Cercideae and Detarieae were elevated to subfamilies, and tribe Cassieae split, with two its subtribes moved to new subfamily Dialioideaeinae and the monotypic subtribe Duparquetiinae elevated to subfamily Duparquetioideae. Subfamily Caesalpinioide was recircumscribed to include the former tribe Caesalpinieae, the remainder of Cassieae, and also subsumed subfamily Mimosoideae as the Mimosoideae clade. The traditional and revised LPWG classification are summarised in the following table.
Phylogenetics
[edit]- Content from Caesalpinioideae#Phylogenetics
- Cladogram follows stated source, but is there a newer version?
Caesalpinioideae, as it was traditionally circumscribed, was paraphyletic. Several molecular phylogenies in the early 2000s showed that the other two subfamilies of Fabaceae (Faboideae and Mimosoideae) were both nested within Caesalpinioideae.[3][4][5][6] Consequently, the subfamilies of Fabaceae were reorganized to make them monophyletic.[7] Caesalpinioideae, as currently defined, contains the following subclades:[4]
|
|
Notes:
- Polhill and Vidal (1981) recognised 8 informal generic groups in tribe Caesalpinieae, while Polhill (1994) recognised a ninth
- the Gleditsia group (2 genera),
- the Acrocarpus group (monogeneric),
- the Sclerolobium group (3 genera),
- the Peltophorum group (13 genera; 16 genera in Polhill 1994),
- the Caesalpinia group (16 genera; 13 genera in Polhill 1994),
- the Poeppigia group (monogeneric),
- the Pterogyne group (monogeneric)
- the Dimorphandra group (10 genera), and
- the Orphanodendron group (monogeneric; Polhill (1994) only).
- the molecular analyses find seven lineages, six derived mainly from tribe Caesalpinieae
- Caesalpinia Group
- Peltophorum group (reduced to a core of 8 genera (or 9 if Heteroflorum recognised)]
- Pterogyne as either sister to Caesalpinia clade (Bruneau-2008) or Cassia clade (Manzanilla-Bruneau-2012)
- Dimorphandra A or Dimorphandra sensu stricto [also includes Dinizia, a traditional mimosoid (Polhill/LOW)]
- a clade with a grade of Dimorphandra genera (Dimorphandra group B) and Mimosoideae
- the Cassia clade, comprising genera from
- subtribe Cassiinae in tribe Cassieae (Cassia, Senna, Chamaecrista)
- part of the Peltophorum group: Batesia, Recordoxylon, Melanoxylon (the Batesia group of Haston et al 2005 and LOW) and Vouacapoua
- the Umtiza clade (or grade in Manzanilla & Bruneau 2012), which comprises (LOW/LOWO)
- the genera in Polhill's Acrocarpus (Acrocarpus) and Gleditsia Groups (Gymnocladus and Gleditsia)
- Arcoa and Tetrapterocarpon (from the Dimorphandra Group),
- Ceratonia (from subtribe Ceratoniinae in tribe Cassieae).
- Umtiza (traditionally included in tribe Detarieae),
- Poeppigia is recovered with the Dialiinae of Cassieae (now subfamily Dialioideae)
References
- ^ Subfamily Caesalpinioideae. Legumes of the World.
- ^ Tribe Cassieae. Legumes of the World.
- ^ Bruneau A, Forest F, Herendeen PS, Klitgaard BB, Lewis GP (2001). "Phylogenetic Relationships in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) as Inferred from Chloroplast trnL Intron Sequences". Syst Bot. 26 (3): 487–514. doi:10.1043/0363-6445-26.3.487 (inactive 28 February 2022).
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of February 2022 (link) - ^ a b Bruneau A, Mercure M, Lewis GP, Herendeen PS (2008). "Phylogenetic patterns and diversification in the caesalpinioid legumes". Botany. 86 (7): 697–718. doi:10.1139/B08-058.
- ^ Manzanilla V, Bruneau A (2012). "Phylogeny reconstruction in the Caesalpinieae grade (Leguminosae) based on duplicated copies of the sucrose synthase gene and plastid markers". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 65 (1): 149–162. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.05.035. PMID 22699157.
- ^ Cardoso D, Pennington RT, de Queiroz LP, Boatwright JS, Van Wykd B-E, Wojciechowskie MF, Lavin M (2013). "Reconstructing the deep-branching relationships of the papilionoid legumes". S. Afr. J. Bot. 89: 58–75. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2013.05.001.
- ^ The Legume Phylogeny Working Group (LPWG). (2017). "A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny". Taxon. 66 (1): 44–77. doi:10.12705/661.3.
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "LOW" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "LOW-Cassia" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "LOW-Caesalpinieae" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Mimosoideae
[edit]Systematics
[edit]- Content from Mimosoideae#Systematics
- Issue: sourcing
Modern molecular phylogenetics suggests the following relationships:[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Papilionoideae
[edit]Systematics
[edit]- Content from Faboideae#Systematics
- Issue: sourcing/accuracy
Modern molecular phylogenetics recommend a clade-based classification of Faboideae as a superior alternative to the traditional tribal classification of Polhill:[10][11][12][13][14]
| Faboideae |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| (Papilionoideae) |
Note: Minor branches have been omitted.
- ^ Bruneau A; Forest F; Herendeen PS; Klitgaard BB; Lewis GP (2001). "Phylogenetic Relationships in the Caesalpinioideae (Leguminosae) as Inferred from Chloroplast trnL Intron Sequences". Syst Bot. 26 (3): 487–514. doi:10.1043/0363-6445-26.3.487 (inactive 28 February 2022).
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of February 2022 (link) - ^ Miller JT; Grimes JW; Murphy DJ; Bayer RJ; Ladiges PY (2003). "A phylogenetic analysis of the Acacieae and Ingeae (Mimosoideae: Fabaceae) based on trnK, matK, psbA–trnH, and trnL/trnF sequence data". Syst Bot. 28 (3): 558–566. doi:10.1043/02-48.1 (inactive 28 February 2022). JSTOR 25063895.
{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of February 2022 (link) - ^ Bruneau A; Mercure M; Lewis GP; Herendeen PS (2008). "Phylogenetic patterns and diversification in the caesalpinioid legumes". Botany. 86 (7): 697–718. doi:10.1139/B08-058.
- ^ Miller JT; Murphy DJ; Brown GK; Richardson DM; González-Orozco CE (2011). "The evolution and phylogenetic placement of invasive Australian Acacia species". Diversity and Distributions. 17 (5): 848–860. doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00780.x. hdl:10019.1/117082. S2CID 86727446.
- ^ Manzanilla V; Bruneau A (2012). "Phylogeny reconstruction in the Caesalpinieae grade (Leguminosae) based on duplicated copies of the sucrose synthase gene and plastid markers". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 65 (1): 149–162. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2012.05.035. PMID 22699157.
- ^ LPWG [Legume Phylogeny Working Group] (2013). "Legume phylogeny and classification in the 21st century: Progress, prospects and lessons for other species-rich clades" (PDF). Taxon. 62 (2): 217–248. doi:10.12705/622.8. hdl:10566/3455.
- ^ a b c Miller JT; Seigler D; Mishler BD (2014). "A phylogenetic solution to the Acacia problem". Taxon. 63 (3): 653–658. doi:10.12705/633.2.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
S&Ewas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
Paraseriantheswas invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cite error: The named reference
Cardoso3was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Cardoso D, Pennington RT, de Queiroz LP, Boatwright JS, Van Wykd BE, Wojciechowskie MF, Lavin M (2013). "Reconstructing the deep-branching relationships of the papilionoid legumes". S Afr J Bot. 89: 58–75. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2013.05.001.
- ^ Wojciechowskie MF (2013). "Towards a new classification of Leguminosae: Naming clades using non-Linnaean phylogenetic nomenclature". S. Afr. J. Bot. 89: 85–93. doi:10.1016/j.sajb.2013.06.017.
- ^ LPWG [Legume Phylogeny Working Group] (2013). "Legume phylogeny and classification in the 21st century: progress, prospects and lessons for other species-rich clades" (PDF). Taxon. 62 (2): 217–248. doi:10.12705/622.8. hdl:10566/3455.
- ^ de Queiroz LP, Pastore JF, Cardoso D, Snak C, de C Lima AL, Gagnon E, Vatanparast M, Holland AE, Egan AN (2015). "A multilocus phylogenetic analysis reveals the monophyly of a recircumscribed papilionoid legume tribe Diocleae with well-supported generic relationships". Mol Phylogenet Evol. 90: 1–19. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2015.04.016. PMID 25934529.