User talk:Jpmonroe

Jack Kemp Problem

I think I may have found the answer to your complaint. I added some text that screwed up a reference, which led you to believe I manufactured a point.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 15:53, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please note my apology/request for assistance in the FAC discussion.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:02, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know you got fed up with me at Jack Kemp. I have nonetheless been hard at work revising the article. Don't let my annoying editing/arguing style impede improving wikipedia by highlighting its best work. If my extensive re-editing has moved you to the fence or over it please update your stance.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 15:33, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your time. I could not muster enough consensus and the article is now at Wikipedia:Peer review/Jack Kemp/archive1. Feel free to come and comment.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 20:05, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]