User:Jme312/Energy poverty/Bibliography

Bibliography

*D’Agostino, Anthony Louis, et al. “What’s the State of Energy Studies Research?: A Content Analysis of Three Leading Journals from 1999 to 2008.” Energy, vol. 36, no. 1, Jan. 2011, pp. 508–519,

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.10.013.

This source analyzes the intersection between energy markets and public policy instruments.

*Dias, Rubens A., et al. “Energy Education: Breaking up the Rational Energy Use Barriers.” Energy Policy, vol. 32, no. 11, July 2004, pp. 1339–1347,

https://doi.org/10.1016/s0301-4215(03)00100-9.

This source talks about energy availability and its economic potential.

*Jessel, Sonal , Samantha Sawyer, and Diana Hernandez. n.d. Energy, Poverty, and Health in Climate Change: A Comprehensive Review of an Emerging Literature. Edited by Allison Appleton.

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00357/full%C2%A0.

This source talks about climate change and its relation to health, and household energy.

*Macías, J.A. Suástegui, A.J. López Valenzuela, A. Acuña Ramírez, P.F. Rosales Escobedo, and A.H. Ruelas Puente. 2023. “Reduction of Energy Poverty in Mexico by Applying an Optimization Model to Residential Energy Tariffs.” Energy Reports 9 (December): 3431–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.02.022.

This source describes a mathematical model intended to reduce energy poverty in Mexico.

*Pablo, Quishpe Sinailin, et al. “Energy Poverty in Ecuador.” Sustainability, vol. 11, no. 22, 11 Nov. 2019, p. 6320, https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226320.

This source uses the energy poverty index to measure energy poverty within Ecuador.

*Palm, Jenny, and Patrik Thollander. “An Interdisciplinary Perspective on Industrial Energy Efficiency.” Applied Energy, vol. 87, no. 10, Oct. 2010, pp. 3255–3261, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.04.019.

This source discusses energy efficiency and its relation to policymaking in Europe.

*Patrik Thollander, and Jenny Palm. 2012. “Barriers to Energy Efficiency from a Sociotechnical Perspective.” Springer EBooks, August, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4162-4_5.

This source describes the barriers and enablers of energy efficiency technology.

‌* Sovacool, Benjamin K., and Michael H. Dworkin. 2015. “Energy Justice: Conceptual Insights and Practical Applications.” Applied Energy 142 (March): 435–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.01.002.

This source analyzes energy justice as an analytical tool for energy planners, consumers, and researchers.

* Sovacool, Benjamin K, et al. “What about Social Science and Interdisciplinarity? A 10-Year Content Analysis of Energy Policy.” Environment & Policy, 25 Nov. 2011, pp. 47–71, https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-007-2333-7_4.

This source analyzes data from 1, 453 articles on energy policy, research, and interdisciplinarity.

World Bank Open Data.” World Bank Open Data,

data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.ELC.ACCS.ZS?locations=SV.

This source provides data on access to electricity in countries around the world from 1991-2021.

User:Jme312/sandbox

Examples:

Luke, Learie. 2007. Identity and secession in the Caribbean: Tobago versus Trinidad, 1889–1980 Kingston, Jamaica: University of the West Indies Press.
- This is a book published by a university press, so it should be a reliable source. It also covers the topic in some depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
Galeano, Gloria; Bernal, Rodrigo (2013-11-08). "Sabinaria , a new genus of palms (Cryosophileae, Coryphoideae, Arecaceae) from the Colombia-Panama border". Phytotaxa.
- This is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, so it should be a reliable source. It covers the topic in some depth, so it's helpful in establishing notability.
Baker, William J.; Dransfield, John (2016). "Beyond Genera Palmarum: progress and prospects in palm systematics". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society.
- This is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, so it should be a reliable source for a specific fact. Since it only dedicates a few sentences to the topic, it can't be used to establish notability.

References

Bibliography

As you gather the sources for your Wikipedia contribution, think about the following:

Is the source from a reliable publication?
- Reliable publications include established newspapers, academic journals and books, textbooks, and other published sources with reputations for accuracy and fact-checking.
- Unreliable sources include blog posts and other self-published works, press releases, and social media posts.
Is the source verifiable?
- In order for a source to be considered verifiable, other editors should be able to consult the source.
Is the source independent of the subject?
- Is the source connected in any way to the subject? This is especially important when writing biographies or about organizations.
- For example, if you were writing a biography, sources like the person's webpage or personal blog would not be considered independent.
Is the source primary or secondary?
- Primary sources include first-hand accounts, autobiographies, and other original content.
- Wikipedia allows limited use of primary sources, but typically only for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts, and only if they are published and verifiable without requiring specialized knowledge.
- Secondary sources should be the main basis for a biography on Wikipedia.
If you're working on a topic related to medicine or psychology, ensure that your sources follow these special guidelines.
If you're creating a new article, consider the following:
- Ensure that your topic meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines.
- In order for a topic to meet the notability requirement, you must be able to identify 2-3 sources that are reliable, verifiable, and independent of the subject you're writing about.
- Finding sufficient sources to establish notability can be especially hard when writing about people or organizations.
- Sources that are not independent of the subject might be useful additions, but don't count towards the notability requirement.
- Wikipedia has developed special guidelines for writing about living persons. Please follow these carefully.
- Wikipedia has a series of guidelines for writing about different categories of people, such as academics and artists. If you're trying to create a new entry about a living person, please look at these carefully.

If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, ask a librarian! If you have questions about Wikipedia's sourcing rules, you can use the Get Help button below to contact your Wikipedia Expert.

Get Help

Outline of proposed changes

Click on the edit button to draft your outline.

Now that you have compiled a bibliography, it's time to plan out how you'll improve your assigned article.

In this section, write up a concise outline of how the sources you've identified will add relevant information to your chosen article. Be sure to discuss what content gap your additions tackle and how these additions will improve the article's quality.

Consider other changes you'll make to the article, including possible deletions of irrelevant, outdated, or incorrect information, restructuring of the article to improve its readability or any other change you plan on making. This is your chance to really think about how your proposed additions will improve your chosen article and to vet your sources even further.

Note: This is not a draft. This is an outline/plan where you can think about how the sources you've identified will fill in a content gap.

Get Help