User:JessicaVDH/Forensic footwear evidence
Detection of footwear evidence
[edit]
Footwear impressions can be detected with a variety of methods including:
- Visually using natural or artificial lighting.
- Using alternate light sources to provide oblique, coaxial, and polarized light for detection of visible and latent impressions.
- Using electrostatic lifting devices to lift dusty impressions. <<remove
- Using fingerprint powder to develop latent impressions.
- Using physical or chemical enhancement methods to develop or enhance faint impressions.
Alternate Light Source
[edit]Alternate light source is the use of a bright white light, such as a flashlight, to better see dusty prints on the ground that may not otherwise be visible to the eye. An alternate light source is usually used by applying oblique lighting to an area of floor to more easily locate footprints to be lifted[1].
Fingerprint Powder
[edit]Similarly to the use of fingerprint powder in fingerprint analysis, fingerprint powder is used when there is a latent footprint that is composed of mostly oils, instead of dust or dirt. The use of fingerprint powder allows the analyst to more easily find the print and identify the characteristics of the print[2].
Other Visualization Methods
[edit]In the case of visualizing footprints, sometimes spray paints are also used to see the details of the impression better, especially in cases of prints in snow which can be tricky to photograph without being spray painted first.
Footwear evidence occurs most often as either footwear impressions left in a soft surface, such as mud, or as dust deposits, which are difficult for the human eye to detect. At violent crime scenes footmarks can be left as a result of a person standing in blood and subsequently trailing it as they move around the scene. The recovery of footwear evidence involves fixing and lifting or casting of the prints to preserve the details of the print and be used for further analysis and comparison.
Footwear impressions can be lifted from surfaces with tools such as adhesive lifters, gelatin lifters or electrostatic lifting devices. These methods are similar to that of fingerprint lifting, which are lifted using one of the previously mentioned methods and then placed on a black or white backing card (depending on the color of the print substrate) to better see the details of the print and for evidence preservation purposes[2]. Adhesive lifters are essentially pieces of tape with a backing on them that are smoothly applied to the print, lifted off of the print and then attached to a backing card. Gelatin lifters are flexible gel sheets made of gelatin which are applied to the 2D impression in the same manner as adhesive lifters and then are covered by the plastic sheet provided with the gelatin lifters[3]. Electrostatic lifting involves the use of high-voltage current on a lifting plate to lift the elements of the print, without disturbing the area as much as traditional lifting methods do, followed by transferring the print from the lifting plate to a gelatin lifter or adhesive lifter[2].
Evidence left via impressions can generally be recovered utilizing a plaster cast, dental stone or silicone. Initially the impression is isolated by framing the area with a solid boundary. Following this a plaster mix can be gently poured inside the frame; it is generally considered not best practice to pour directly onto the impression. In some cases where the surface is not ideal for casting prior techniques can be utilised to gain a better cast of the impression. Sand can often be fixed in place by applying an aerosol resin, glue or hair spray is often used in combination with chalk to assist in ease of lifting the cast out of the print more gently. Wet mud impressions can be dried using a combination of pipetting water from the surface and applying hot air, often in the form of a hair dryer.
Fixing Techniques
[edit]When using plaster to cast a footprint, it is recommended to use a fixing agent to prevent the loss of detail when creating a plaster cast. These fixing agents include shellacs, glues, aerosol resins and hairsprays, which are sprayed liberally on the print before pouring the plaster of Paris into the impression[4]. Often times, chalk is also applied to the impression as an added protective measure against damaging the print.
Plaster/Dental Stone
[edit]Generally speaking, plaster of Paris and dental stone are mixed in the same way at a scene, usually by adding water to the powder in a baggy until a thick, but pourable consistency and then pouring the mixture indirectly into the impression[5]. After the plaster/stone is applied it is allowed to set and then gently lifted out of the impression. The reason that plaster and dental stone are not used in snow prints is because dental stone heats up as it sets, while prill sulfur will only cool down as it sets.
Prill Sulfur
[edit]In instances where there are impressions in snow or slush, prill sulfur is used to avoid melting the impression substrate. Prill sulfur is prepared by melting the sulfur on a hot plate in a well ventilated area and then allowing the mixture to cool, while stirring continuously[6]. The sulfur mixture can then be poured into the impression and left to set and then analyzed.
Footwear evidence can be recovered with use of 3D scanners.
There are two types of 3D scanners used in forensics:
- crime scene scanners able to capture a large overview map of the scene;
- ‘close-up’ 3D scanners able to capture individual objects in high resolution and full colour.[7]
 | This is the sandbox page where you will draft your initial Wikipedia contribution.
If you're starting a new article, you can develop it here until it's ready to go live. If you're working on improvements to an existing article, copy only one section at a time of the article to this sandbox to work on, and be sure to use an edit summary linking to the article you copied from. Do not copy over the entire article. You can find additional instructions here. Remember to save your work regularly using the "Publish page" button. (It just means 'save'; it will still be in the sandbox.) You can add bold formatting to your additions to differentiate them from existing content. |
Article Draft
[edit]Lead
[edit]Article body
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Buszka, Norman Marin, Jeffrey (2014-11-09). Alternate Light Source Imaging: Forensic Photography Techniques. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315722160/alternate-light-source-imaging-norman-marin-jeffrey-buszka. ISBN 978-1-315-72216-0.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ a b c Bodziak, William, J. (1999). "Footwear Impression Evidence: Detection, Recovery and Examination". www.taylorfrancis.com. Retrieved 2024-04-12.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Taylor, Kate M.; Krosch, Matt N.; Chaseling, Janet; Wright, Kirsty (2021). "A comparison of three shoe sole impression lifting methods at high substrate temperatures". Journal of Forensic Sciences. 66 (1): 303–314. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.14595. ISSN 0022-1198.
- ^ Battiest, Travis; Clutter, Susan W.; McGill, David (2016). "A Comparison of Various Fixatives for Casting Footwear Impressions in Sand at Crime Scenes1". Journal of Forensic Sciences. 61 (3): 782–786. doi:10.1111/1556-4029.13044. ISSN 0022-1198.
- ^ Du Pasquier, E.; Hebrard, J.; Margot, P.; Ineichen, M. (1995). "Evaluation and comparison of casting materials in forensic sciences Applications to tool marks and foot/shoe impressions". Forensic Science International. 82 (1): 33–43. doi:10.1016/0379-0738(96)01964-0. ISSN 0379-0738.
- ^ Bodziak, William, J. (2008). "Tire Tread and Tire Track Evidence: Recovery and Forensic Examination". www.taylorfrancis.com. Retrieved 2024-04-12.
{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "3D Scanning: A New Tool for Cracking Tough Cases". Forensic Magazine. 2009-02-01. Retrieved 2016-12-01.