User:JennKR/Baking a cake doesn't make you a baker
 | This is an essay. It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines, as it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. |
 | This page in a nutshell: The first sentence of the lead should establish why that person is most notable; listing every venture is unnecessary. |
A common trend amongst biographies of living persons (especially celebrities) is the inclusion of superfluous job titles in the lead's first sentence. Often, said celebrity may donate some money to charity and is suddenly considered a "philanthropist" or make a cameo appearance in some Hollywood film and is now an "actor". Editors should take caution when asserting that a person is most prominent for a certain venture, and remember that baking a cake doesn't make you a baker.
Case Study
[edit]Mariah Carey
[edit]An example of which could be the Mariah Carey, of which the lead reads: (as of 12 April, 2013)
Mariah Carey[1] (born March 27, 1970) is an American singer, songwriter, record producer, actress, and philanthropist.
can be expanded to read:
Mariah Carey[2] (born March 27, 1970) is an American, singer, songwriter, lyricist, record producer, recording artist, actress, American Idol judge, weight loss ambassador, philanthropist, wife and mother.
What's notable?
[edit]Although the above is extreme, the message I am trying to get across is made much clearer by it.
Perhaps ask yourself this:
- What is that person famous for?
- What ventures does the article explore in the most depth?
- What is/isn't notable?
- If the person in question has done the venture once (or very few times), does it deserve to be in the lead sentence?
...and start a talk-page if unsure and to gather consensus for any new "job titles".