User:Jdelmer/sandbox
This is a user sandbox of Jdelmer. You can use it for testing or practicing edits. This is not the sandbox where you should draft your assigned article for a dashboard.wikiedu.org course. To find the right sandbox for your assignment, visit your Dashboard course page and follow the Sandbox Draft link for your assigned article in the My Articles section. |
Resultant planning changes, coss or degradation of services, new fees
[edit]Due to the reduction in revenue generated from property tax, local governments have become more dependent on sales taxes for general revenue funds, which some maintain has resulted in the “fiscalization of land use”. The fiscalization of land use is the incentive for local governments to attract new commercial developments such as big box retailers and car dealerships instead of residential housing developments. The cause of this trend is because commercial developments generate revenue for the general fund through sales tax and business licenses tax.[1] The jobs and ongoing sales tax those stores provide may discourage growth of other sectors and job types that may provide better opportunities for residents.[2][3] Office and retail development are further incentivized because they do not cost the local governments as much as residential developments in terms of public services.[4] Additionally, cities have decreased services and increased fees to compensate for the shortfall, with particularly high impact fees levied on developers building new houses or industrial outlets.[3] Impact fees are a way to impose the cost of the additional services and infrastructure that new developments will require.[5] These costs are typically shifted to the building's buyer, who may be unaware of the thousands in fees included with the building's cost.[3]
- ^ Fulton, William; Shigley, Paul (2012). Guide to California Planning (PDF) (fourth ed.). Point Arena, California: Solano Press Books. pp. 283–300. ISBN 978-1-938-166-02-0. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
- ^ Cite error: The named reference
senpeace
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ a b c Cite error: The named reference
ppi
was invoked but never defined (see the help page). - ^ Elmer, Vicki; Thorne-Lyman, Abigail; Belzer, Dena. "Fiscal Analysis and Land Use Policy in California: A Case Study of the San Jose Employment Land Conversion Analysis" (PDF). Lincoln Institute of Land Policy. Institute of Urban and Regional Development. Retrieved 17 November 2016.
- ^ "APA Policy Guide on Impact Fees". American Planning Association. American Planning Association. Retrieved 17 November 2016.