User:Jacobisq/Ely inquiry

This is not a Wikipedia article: It is an individual user's work-in-progress page, and may be incomplete and/or unreliable. For guidance on developing this draft, see Wikipedia:So you made a userspace draft.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs
This page was last edited by Fayenatic london (talk | contribs) 5 years ago. (Update timer)

Finished writing a draft article? Are you ready to request an experienced editor review it for possible inclusion in Wikipedia? Submit your draft for review!

The Ely Inquiry or Inquisitio Eliensis [IE] was a satellite of the 1086 Domesday Book survey. Its importance is both that it gives a more detailed account of the local area than the Book itself, and that its prologue offers an account of the terms of enquiry of the Domesday survey.

Origins

According to David C. Douglas, the Ely Inquiry was the product of an ecclesiastical landlord using the Domesday survey to produce a record of his own estates^[1] - something supported by the way it records the lands of one tenant-in-chief across many different Domesday cicuits.^[2]

Prologue

The prologue to IE gives an account of the methods of the Domesday inquest, working by way of reports (under oath) of sheriffs, Barons “and of their Frenchmen and of the whole hundred, of the priest, the reeve, and six villeins of each vill”.^[3] It records a series of questions to be asked with respect to each manor, adding that all the answers were to be given in triplicate - “hoc totum tripliciter” - so as to cover three distinct times: Edward the Confessor's day, the time of the Conquest (1066), and the present-day (1086).^[4]

While sometimes taken to fully reflect the actual Domesday process, the prologue is perhaps better seen as an abbreviated guide to the questions used,^[5] not as necessarily having a direct link to the official specifications.^[6]

Survey

The survey provides more information than its main equivalent, Little Domeday.^[7] In particular it gives more details about the jurors behind it,^[8] as well as stressing the local roles of sokemen.^[9]

Its summaries emphasise taxable capacities; while its closing schedules have been interpreted as records of early stages of the inquest (which had been edited out in the main work).^[10]

References

^ J. G. Edwards ed. Historical Essays in Honour of James Tait (Manchester 1933) p. 56
^ Ely Investigation
^ Quoted in D. Barber, The Early Middle Ages (London 1966) p. 92
^ J. Gillingham ed., Proceedings of the British Conference 2004 (2004) p. 132 and p. 149
^ D. Roffe, Decoding Domesday (2015) p. 60
^ J. Gillingham ed., Proceedings of the British Conference 2004 (2004) p. 132 and p. 149
^ H. C. Darby, The Domesday Geography of Eastern England (2006) p. 153
^ R. Fleming, Domesday Book and the Law (2003) p. 20
^ J. H. Round, Feudal England (2015) Section XVI
^ D. Roffe, Domesday Now (2016) p. 20

External links

Articles of Inquiry

Category:12th-century documents Category:Domesday Book

[1] J. G. Edwards ed. Historical Essays in Honour of James Tait (Manchester 1933) p. 56

[2] Ely Investigation

[3] Quoted in D. Barber, The Early Middle Ages (London 1966) p. 92

[4] J. Gillingham ed., Proceedings of the British Conference 2004 (2004) p. 132 and p. 149

[5] D. Roffe, Decoding Domesday (2015) p. 60

[6] J. Gillingham ed., Proceedings of the British Conference 2004 (2004) p. 132 and p. 149

[7] H. C. Darby, The Domesday Geography of Eastern England (2006) p. 153

[8] R. Fleming, Domesday Book and the Law (2003) p. 20

[9] J. H. Round, Feudal England (2015) Section XVI

[10] D. Roffe, Domesday Now (2016) p. 20

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]